Prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction in recreational athletes: a cross-sectional survey

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) affects many women and participation in elite sport and high-impact exercise has been reported as a potential risk. However, few studies have investigated the effects of exercising at recreational levels on PFD. Our aim was to investigate levels of PFD in women exercising at, or above, UK guidelines for health and compare them with levels in non-exercisers. METHOD: Data on levels of PFD and potential risk factors (age, hormonal status, body mass index, constipation, parity, forceps delivery, and recreational exercise) were collected using a cross-sectional survey distributed via social media. The International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) Urinary Incontinence Short Form was used to estimate prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI). Selected questions from the ICIQ vaginal symptom and bowel symptom questionnaires were used to estimate prevalence of anal incontinence (AI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Logistic regression analysis was used to compare exercisers and non-exercisers after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: We recruited 1,598 adult women (1,141 exercisers and 457 non-exercisers). The majority were parous. High prevalence of UI (70%), AI (52%) and POP (18%) was reported. No significant association was found between recreational exercise and PFD despite adjustment for confounders, or further investigation regarding exercise involving impact, although some increased reporting of AI was seen in those exercising for over 10 hours per week. CONCLUSION: High levels of all PFD were reported but no significant association was found between recreational exercise and symptoms. However, data suggest that women modify their exercise regimes as required. Few symptomatic women sought professional help. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-023-05548-8