Cargando…

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic affected medical care for chronic diseases. This study aimed to systematically assess the pandemic impact on oncological care in Germany using a rapid review. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, study and preprint registries and study bibliographies were searched for studies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Santis, Karina Karolina, Helmer, Stefanie, Barnes, Benjamin, Kraywinkel, Klaus, Imhoff, Maren, Müller-Eberstein, Roxana, Kirstein, Mathia, Quatmann, Anna, Simke, Julia, Stiens, Lisa, Christianson, Lara, Zeeb, Hajo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05063-9
_version_ 1785123963794358272
author De Santis, Karina Karolina
Helmer, Stefanie
Barnes, Benjamin
Kraywinkel, Klaus
Imhoff, Maren
Müller-Eberstein, Roxana
Kirstein, Mathia
Quatmann, Anna
Simke, Julia
Stiens, Lisa
Christianson, Lara
Zeeb, Hajo
author_facet De Santis, Karina Karolina
Helmer, Stefanie
Barnes, Benjamin
Kraywinkel, Klaus
Imhoff, Maren
Müller-Eberstein, Roxana
Kirstein, Mathia
Quatmann, Anna
Simke, Julia
Stiens, Lisa
Christianson, Lara
Zeeb, Hajo
author_sort De Santis, Karina Karolina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic affected medical care for chronic diseases. This study aimed to systematically assess the pandemic impact on oncological care in Germany using a rapid review. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, study and preprint registries and study bibliographies were searched for studies published between 2020 and 2 November 2022. Inclusion was based on the PCC framework: population (cancer), concept (oncological care) and context (COVID-19 pandemic in Germany). Studies were selected after title/abstract and full-text screening by two authors. Extracted data were synthesized using descriptive statistics or narratively. Risk of bias was assessed and summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Overall, 77 records (59 peer-reviewed studies and 18 reports) with administrative, cancer registry and survey data were included. Disruptions in oncological care were reported and varied according to pandemic-related factors (e.g., pandemic stage) and other (non-pandemic) factors (e.g., care details). During higher restriction periods fewer consultations and non-urgent surgeries, and delayed diagnosis and screening were consistently reported. Heterogeneous results were reported for treatment types other than surgery (e.g., psychosocial care) and aftercare, while ongoing care remained mostly unchanged. The risk of bias was on average moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Disruptions in oncological care were reported during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Such disruptions probably depended on factors that were insufficiently controlled for in statistical analyses and evidence quality was on average only moderate. Research focus on patient outcomes (e.g., longer term consequences of disruptions) and pandemic management by healthcare systems is potentially relevant for future pandemics or health emergencies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-05063-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10590309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105903092023-10-23 Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review De Santis, Karina Karolina Helmer, Stefanie Barnes, Benjamin Kraywinkel, Klaus Imhoff, Maren Müller-Eberstein, Roxana Kirstein, Mathia Quatmann, Anna Simke, Julia Stiens, Lisa Christianson, Lara Zeeb, Hajo J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Review OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic affected medical care for chronic diseases. This study aimed to systematically assess the pandemic impact on oncological care in Germany using a rapid review. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, study and preprint registries and study bibliographies were searched for studies published between 2020 and 2 November 2022. Inclusion was based on the PCC framework: population (cancer), concept (oncological care) and context (COVID-19 pandemic in Germany). Studies were selected after title/abstract and full-text screening by two authors. Extracted data were synthesized using descriptive statistics or narratively. Risk of bias was assessed and summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Overall, 77 records (59 peer-reviewed studies and 18 reports) with administrative, cancer registry and survey data were included. Disruptions in oncological care were reported and varied according to pandemic-related factors (e.g., pandemic stage) and other (non-pandemic) factors (e.g., care details). During higher restriction periods fewer consultations and non-urgent surgeries, and delayed diagnosis and screening were consistently reported. Heterogeneous results were reported for treatment types other than surgery (e.g., psychosocial care) and aftercare, while ongoing care remained mostly unchanged. The risk of bias was on average moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Disruptions in oncological care were reported during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Such disruptions probably depended on factors that were insufficiently controlled for in statistical analyses and evidence quality was on average only moderate. Research focus on patient outcomes (e.g., longer term consequences of disruptions) and pandemic management by healthcare systems is potentially relevant for future pandemics or health emergencies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-023-05063-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10590309/ /pubmed/37507594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05063-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
De Santis, Karina Karolina
Helmer, Stefanie
Barnes, Benjamin
Kraywinkel, Klaus
Imhoff, Maren
Müller-Eberstein, Roxana
Kirstein, Mathia
Quatmann, Anna
Simke, Julia
Stiens, Lisa
Christianson, Lara
Zeeb, Hajo
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review
title Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review
title_full Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review
title_fullStr Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review
title_short Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care in Germany: rapid review
title_sort impact of the covid-19 pandemic on oncological care in germany: rapid review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37507594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05063-9
work_keys_str_mv AT desantiskarinakarolina impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT helmerstefanie impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT barnesbenjamin impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT kraywinkelklaus impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT imhoffmaren impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT mullerebersteinroxana impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT kirsteinmathia impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT quatmannanna impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT simkejulia impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT stienslisa impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT christiansonlara impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview
AT zeebhajo impactofthecovid19pandemicononcologicalcareingermanyrapidreview