Cargando…
Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis
PURPOSE: To investigate patterns of ancillary imaging testing among vitreoretinal specialists for patients with vitreoretinal disease in the United States (US). METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT), color fundus photography (CFP), and fluorescein angiography (FA), ordered by vitreoretinal spe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37873056 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S433338 |
_version_ | 1785124021244788736 |
---|---|
author | Vishwakarma, Saloni Borkar, Durga S LaPrise, Andrew Mbagwu, Michael Leng, Theodore |
author_facet | Vishwakarma, Saloni Borkar, Durga S LaPrise, Andrew Mbagwu, Michael Leng, Theodore |
author_sort | Vishwakarma, Saloni |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate patterns of ancillary imaging testing among vitreoretinal specialists for patients with vitreoretinal disease in the United States (US). METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT), color fundus photography (CFP), and fluorescein angiography (FA), ordered by vitreoretinal specialists and documented within the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS(®) Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2020, were retrospectively assessed. Trends in imaging modality choice were analyzed by payer type, geographic region, and practice type. Sub-analyses were conducted according to categorization of vitreoretinal specialists into those treating a high versus low volume of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). RESULTS: OCT was the most common imaging modality used, followed by CFP and FA. Following normalization, the highest volume of OCT procedures performed were identified among Medicare Advantage and Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries, within the South of the US, and at medium and large practices. Minimal differences were observed for CFP and FA volume across payer types and regions. Across practice types, the largest volume of CFP and FA procedures were identified in small and private equity owned practices, respectively. Vitreoretinal specialists with a high nAMD volume more frequently performed OCT than those with a low nAMD volume. CONCLUSION: Vitreoretinal specialists demonstrated a strong preference for OCT, with real-world associations according to payer type, geographic location, and practice type. Volume of nAMD patients seen impacted the likelihood of specialists ordering OCTs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10590590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105905902023-10-23 Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis Vishwakarma, Saloni Borkar, Durga S LaPrise, Andrew Mbagwu, Michael Leng, Theodore Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To investigate patterns of ancillary imaging testing among vitreoretinal specialists for patients with vitreoretinal disease in the United States (US). METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT), color fundus photography (CFP), and fluorescein angiography (FA), ordered by vitreoretinal specialists and documented within the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS(®) Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2020, were retrospectively assessed. Trends in imaging modality choice were analyzed by payer type, geographic region, and practice type. Sub-analyses were conducted according to categorization of vitreoretinal specialists into those treating a high versus low volume of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). RESULTS: OCT was the most common imaging modality used, followed by CFP and FA. Following normalization, the highest volume of OCT procedures performed were identified among Medicare Advantage and Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries, within the South of the US, and at medium and large practices. Minimal differences were observed for CFP and FA volume across payer types and regions. Across practice types, the largest volume of CFP and FA procedures were identified in small and private equity owned practices, respectively. Vitreoretinal specialists with a high nAMD volume more frequently performed OCT than those with a low nAMD volume. CONCLUSION: Vitreoretinal specialists demonstrated a strong preference for OCT, with real-world associations according to payer type, geographic location, and practice type. Volume of nAMD patients seen impacted the likelihood of specialists ordering OCTs. Dove 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10590590/ /pubmed/37873056 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S433338 Text en © 2023 Vishwakarma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Vishwakarma, Saloni Borkar, Durga S LaPrise, Andrew Mbagwu, Michael Leng, Theodore Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis |
title | Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis |
title_full | Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis |
title_fullStr | Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis |
title_short | Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis |
title_sort | vitreoretinal specialist use of ancillary testing: an iris(®) registry analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37873056 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S433338 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vishwakarmasaloni vitreoretinalspecialistuseofancillarytestinganirisregistryanalysis AT borkardurgas vitreoretinalspecialistuseofancillarytestinganirisregistryanalysis AT lapriseandrew vitreoretinalspecialistuseofancillarytestinganirisregistryanalysis AT mbagwumichael vitreoretinalspecialistuseofancillarytestinganirisregistryanalysis AT lengtheodore vitreoretinalspecialistuseofancillarytestinganirisregistryanalysis |