Cargando…

Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis

PURPOSE: To investigate patterns of ancillary imaging testing among vitreoretinal specialists for patients with vitreoretinal disease in the United States (US). METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT), color fundus photography (CFP), and fluorescein angiography (FA), ordered by vitreoretinal spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vishwakarma, Saloni, Borkar, Durga S, LaPrise, Andrew, Mbagwu, Michael, Leng, Theodore
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37873056
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S433338
_version_ 1785124021244788736
author Vishwakarma, Saloni
Borkar, Durga S
LaPrise, Andrew
Mbagwu, Michael
Leng, Theodore
author_facet Vishwakarma, Saloni
Borkar, Durga S
LaPrise, Andrew
Mbagwu, Michael
Leng, Theodore
author_sort Vishwakarma, Saloni
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate patterns of ancillary imaging testing among vitreoretinal specialists for patients with vitreoretinal disease in the United States (US). METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT), color fundus photography (CFP), and fluorescein angiography (FA), ordered by vitreoretinal specialists and documented within the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS(®) Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2020, were retrospectively assessed. Trends in imaging modality choice were analyzed by payer type, geographic region, and practice type. Sub-analyses were conducted according to categorization of vitreoretinal specialists into those treating a high versus low volume of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). RESULTS: OCT was the most common imaging modality used, followed by CFP and FA. Following normalization, the highest volume of OCT procedures performed were identified among Medicare Advantage and Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries, within the South of the US, and at medium and large practices. Minimal differences were observed for CFP and FA volume across payer types and regions. Across practice types, the largest volume of CFP and FA procedures were identified in small and private equity owned practices, respectively. Vitreoretinal specialists with a high nAMD volume more frequently performed OCT than those with a low nAMD volume. CONCLUSION: Vitreoretinal specialists demonstrated a strong preference for OCT, with real-world associations according to payer type, geographic location, and practice type. Volume of nAMD patients seen impacted the likelihood of specialists ordering OCTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10590590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105905902023-10-23 Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis Vishwakarma, Saloni Borkar, Durga S LaPrise, Andrew Mbagwu, Michael Leng, Theodore Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To investigate patterns of ancillary imaging testing among vitreoretinal specialists for patients with vitreoretinal disease in the United States (US). METHODS: Optical coherence tomography (OCT), color fundus photography (CFP), and fluorescein angiography (FA), ordered by vitreoretinal specialists and documented within the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS(®) Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) between 01 January 2018 and 31 December 2020, were retrospectively assessed. Trends in imaging modality choice were analyzed by payer type, geographic region, and practice type. Sub-analyses were conducted according to categorization of vitreoretinal specialists into those treating a high versus low volume of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). RESULTS: OCT was the most common imaging modality used, followed by CFP and FA. Following normalization, the highest volume of OCT procedures performed were identified among Medicare Advantage and Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries, within the South of the US, and at medium and large practices. Minimal differences were observed for CFP and FA volume across payer types and regions. Across practice types, the largest volume of CFP and FA procedures were identified in small and private equity owned practices, respectively. Vitreoretinal specialists with a high nAMD volume more frequently performed OCT than those with a low nAMD volume. CONCLUSION: Vitreoretinal specialists demonstrated a strong preference for OCT, with real-world associations according to payer type, geographic location, and practice type. Volume of nAMD patients seen impacted the likelihood of specialists ordering OCTs. Dove 2023-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10590590/ /pubmed/37873056 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S433338 Text en © 2023 Vishwakarma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Vishwakarma, Saloni
Borkar, Durga S
LaPrise, Andrew
Mbagwu, Michael
Leng, Theodore
Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis
title Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis
title_full Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis
title_fullStr Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis
title_short Vitreoretinal Specialist Use of Ancillary Testing: An IRIS(®) Registry Analysis
title_sort vitreoretinal specialist use of ancillary testing: an iris(®) registry analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37873056
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S433338
work_keys_str_mv AT vishwakarmasaloni vitreoretinalspecialistuseofancillarytestinganirisregistryanalysis
AT borkardurgas vitreoretinalspecialistuseofancillarytestinganirisregistryanalysis
AT lapriseandrew vitreoretinalspecialistuseofancillarytestinganirisregistryanalysis
AT mbagwumichael vitreoretinalspecialistuseofancillarytestinganirisregistryanalysis
AT lengtheodore vitreoretinalspecialistuseofancillarytestinganirisregistryanalysis