Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of N95 and Surgical Facemasks on Pregnant Women Performing Moderate-Intensity Exercise: A Prospective Randomized Study

Background and objective A facemask is often indicated for the control of the spread of airborne pathogens. At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was mass enforcement of mask use across the globe. Pregnant women were not excluded. While several studies have been conducted to evaluate and compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akpan, Ubong B, Akpanika, Chinyere J, Asibong, Udeme, Ekott, Mabel, Etuk, Saturday
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37872900
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45776
_version_ 1785124034080407552
author Akpan, Ubong B
Akpanika, Chinyere J
Asibong, Udeme
Ekott, Mabel
Etuk, Saturday
author_facet Akpan, Ubong B
Akpanika, Chinyere J
Asibong, Udeme
Ekott, Mabel
Etuk, Saturday
author_sort Akpan, Ubong B
collection PubMed
description Background and objective A facemask is often indicated for the control of the spread of airborne pathogens. At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was mass enforcement of mask use across the globe. Pregnant women were not excluded. While several studies have been conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacy of various mask types, data on their effects on pregnant women during exercise are scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of N95 and surgical facemasks on the cardiopulmonary functions of pregnant women during moderate-intensity exercise. Methods A prospective randomized study was conducted among 104 healthy women with advanced singleton pregnancies performing moderate-intensity exercise wearing either surgical or N95 masks during routine antenatal care. Their respiratory rates were counted, and arterial oxygen saturation (SPO(2)) and radial pulses (heart rates) were recorded with a mobile digital pulse oximeter at baseline and after 30 minutes of exercise. The mean values were calculated. Data analysis was done using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 25; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). An independent t-test was used to compare the mean SPO(2) and radial pulse between the two groups. Chi-square was used to examine differences in categorical variables. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results Their demographic profiles and measured baseline parameters were comparable. Following a 30-minute exercise, the N95 mask group had lower mean SPO(2) compared to the surgical mask group (95.5% versus 97.0%; P=0.028, 95%CI; -2.607 to 0.15). Further, the N95 group recorded a higher mean heart rate than the surgical mask group ((97.23 b/m versus 95.02b/m, respectively, mean difference (MD)=2.212, P=0.021, 95%Cl: 1.249-3.672). The mean respiratory rates were also higher among women in the N95 mask group (32.1 c/m versus 29.08 c/m, MD=3.018, 95%CI: 1.392-4.662, P=0.001). Conclusion The study, comparing the relative effects of the surgical and N95 facemask on the cardiorespiratory functions of exercising pregnant women, findings suggest that surgical facemasks may be better tolerated in advanced pregnancy when performing routine antenatal aerobic exercise in comparison with N95 masks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10590647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105906472023-10-23 A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of N95 and Surgical Facemasks on Pregnant Women Performing Moderate-Intensity Exercise: A Prospective Randomized Study Akpan, Ubong B Akpanika, Chinyere J Asibong, Udeme Ekott, Mabel Etuk, Saturday Cureus Epidemiology/Public Health Background and objective A facemask is often indicated for the control of the spread of airborne pathogens. At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was mass enforcement of mask use across the globe. Pregnant women were not excluded. While several studies have been conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacy of various mask types, data on their effects on pregnant women during exercise are scarce. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of N95 and surgical facemasks on the cardiopulmonary functions of pregnant women during moderate-intensity exercise. Methods A prospective randomized study was conducted among 104 healthy women with advanced singleton pregnancies performing moderate-intensity exercise wearing either surgical or N95 masks during routine antenatal care. Their respiratory rates were counted, and arterial oxygen saturation (SPO(2)) and radial pulses (heart rates) were recorded with a mobile digital pulse oximeter at baseline and after 30 minutes of exercise. The mean values were calculated. Data analysis was done using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 25; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). An independent t-test was used to compare the mean SPO(2) and radial pulse between the two groups. Chi-square was used to examine differences in categorical variables. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results Their demographic profiles and measured baseline parameters were comparable. Following a 30-minute exercise, the N95 mask group had lower mean SPO(2) compared to the surgical mask group (95.5% versus 97.0%; P=0.028, 95%CI; -2.607 to 0.15). Further, the N95 group recorded a higher mean heart rate than the surgical mask group ((97.23 b/m versus 95.02b/m, respectively, mean difference (MD)=2.212, P=0.021, 95%Cl: 1.249-3.672). The mean respiratory rates were also higher among women in the N95 mask group (32.1 c/m versus 29.08 c/m, MD=3.018, 95%CI: 1.392-4.662, P=0.001). Conclusion The study, comparing the relative effects of the surgical and N95 facemask on the cardiorespiratory functions of exercising pregnant women, findings suggest that surgical facemasks may be better tolerated in advanced pregnancy when performing routine antenatal aerobic exercise in comparison with N95 masks. Cureus 2023-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10590647/ /pubmed/37872900 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45776 Text en Copyright © 2023, Akpan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Public Health
Akpan, Ubong B
Akpanika, Chinyere J
Asibong, Udeme
Ekott, Mabel
Etuk, Saturday
A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of N95 and Surgical Facemasks on Pregnant Women Performing Moderate-Intensity Exercise: A Prospective Randomized Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of N95 and Surgical Facemasks on Pregnant Women Performing Moderate-Intensity Exercise: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of N95 and Surgical Facemasks on Pregnant Women Performing Moderate-Intensity Exercise: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of N95 and Surgical Facemasks on Pregnant Women Performing Moderate-Intensity Exercise: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of N95 and Surgical Facemasks on Pregnant Women Performing Moderate-Intensity Exercise: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of the Effects of N95 and Surgical Facemasks on Pregnant Women Performing Moderate-Intensity Exercise: A Prospective Randomized Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of the effects of n95 and surgical facemasks on pregnant women performing moderate-intensity exercise: a prospective randomized study
topic Epidemiology/Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37872900
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45776
work_keys_str_mv AT akpanubongb acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofn95andsurgicalfacemasksonpregnantwomenperformingmoderateintensityexerciseaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT akpanikachinyerej acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofn95andsurgicalfacemasksonpregnantwomenperformingmoderateintensityexerciseaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT asibongudeme acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofn95andsurgicalfacemasksonpregnantwomenperformingmoderateintensityexerciseaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT ekottmabel acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofn95andsurgicalfacemasksonpregnantwomenperformingmoderateintensityexerciseaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT etuksaturday acomparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofn95andsurgicalfacemasksonpregnantwomenperformingmoderateintensityexerciseaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT akpanubongb comparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofn95andsurgicalfacemasksonpregnantwomenperformingmoderateintensityexerciseaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT akpanikachinyerej comparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofn95andsurgicalfacemasksonpregnantwomenperformingmoderateintensityexerciseaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT asibongudeme comparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofn95andsurgicalfacemasksonpregnantwomenperformingmoderateintensityexerciseaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT ekottmabel comparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofn95andsurgicalfacemasksonpregnantwomenperformingmoderateintensityexerciseaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT etuksaturday comparativeevaluationoftheeffectsofn95andsurgicalfacemasksonpregnantwomenperformingmoderateintensityexerciseaprospectiverandomizedstudy