Cargando…
Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire
INTRODUCTION: Intrapartum ultrasound (IU) is used in the delivery ward; even if IU monitors the labouring women, it could be perceived as a discomfort and even as an“ obstetric violence”, because it is a young technique, not often well "accepted". A group of clinicians aimed at obtain an i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100246 |
_version_ | 1785124054132326400 |
---|---|
author | Malvasi, Antonio Damiani, Gianluca Raffaello DI Naro, Edoardo Vitagliano, Amerigo Dellino, Miriam Achiron, Reuven Ioannis, Kosmas Vimercati, Antonella Gaetani, Maria Cicinelli, Ettore Vinciguerra, Marina Ricci, Ilaria Tinelli, Andrea Baldini, Giorgio Maria Silvestris, Erica Trojano, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Malvasi, Antonio Damiani, Gianluca Raffaello DI Naro, Edoardo Vitagliano, Amerigo Dellino, Miriam Achiron, Reuven Ioannis, Kosmas Vimercati, Antonella Gaetani, Maria Cicinelli, Ettore Vinciguerra, Marina Ricci, Ilaria Tinelli, Andrea Baldini, Giorgio Maria Silvestris, Erica Trojano, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Malvasi, Antonio |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Intrapartum ultrasound (IU) is used in the delivery ward; even if IU monitors the labouring women, it could be perceived as a discomfort and even as an“ obstetric violence”, because it is a young technique, not often well "accepted". A group of clinicians aimed at obtain an informed consent from patients, prior to perform a translabial ultrasound (TU). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of both translabial and transabdominal IU. METHODS: In this study, performed at the University Hospital of Bari (Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology), were enrolled 103 patients in the first or second stage of labor in singleton cephalic presentation. A statistical frequency and an association analysis were performed. As a significant result, we consider the peace of mind/satisfaction and the” obstetric violence”. IU was performed both transabdominal and translabial to determine the presentation, head positions, angle of progression and head perineum distance. During the first and second stage of labor, the ASIUG questionnaires (Apulia study intrapartum ultrasonography group) were administered. RESULTS: 74 (71, 84%) patients underwent IU and 29 had a vaginal examination (28, 15%). Significant less “violence” has been experienced with a IU (73 out 74/98, 65%) and only one person (1 /1, 35%) recorded that. On the contrary, 10 patients (10/29) perceived that “violence” (34, 48%) while 19 (65, 52%) did not respond on a similar way, after a vaginal examination (VE). More patients felt satisfaction (71 out 74/95, 95%) with the use of IU and only 3 (3/4, 05%) felt unease. A different picture was evident in the vaginal examination group. Only 17 patients (17 out 29/58, 62%) felt comfort while 12 (41, 38%) felt unease. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, IU use is well accepted by most of patients, because it could reassure women about their fetal condition. Moreover, they can see the fetus on the screen, while the obstetrician is performing the US and this is important for a visual feedback, in comparison with the classical VE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10590726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105907262023-10-24 Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire Malvasi, Antonio Damiani, Gianluca Raffaello DI Naro, Edoardo Vitagliano, Amerigo Dellino, Miriam Achiron, Reuven Ioannis, Kosmas Vimercati, Antonella Gaetani, Maria Cicinelli, Ettore Vinciguerra, Marina Ricci, Ilaria Tinelli, Andrea Baldini, Giorgio Maria Silvestris, Erica Trojano, Giuseppe Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine INTRODUCTION: Intrapartum ultrasound (IU) is used in the delivery ward; even if IU monitors the labouring women, it could be perceived as a discomfort and even as an“ obstetric violence”, because it is a young technique, not often well "accepted". A group of clinicians aimed at obtain an informed consent from patients, prior to perform a translabial ultrasound (TU). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of both translabial and transabdominal IU. METHODS: In this study, performed at the University Hospital of Bari (Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology), were enrolled 103 patients in the first or second stage of labor in singleton cephalic presentation. A statistical frequency and an association analysis were performed. As a significant result, we consider the peace of mind/satisfaction and the” obstetric violence”. IU was performed both transabdominal and translabial to determine the presentation, head positions, angle of progression and head perineum distance. During the first and second stage of labor, the ASIUG questionnaires (Apulia study intrapartum ultrasonography group) were administered. RESULTS: 74 (71, 84%) patients underwent IU and 29 had a vaginal examination (28, 15%). Significant less “violence” has been experienced with a IU (73 out 74/98, 65%) and only one person (1 /1, 35%) recorded that. On the contrary, 10 patients (10/29) perceived that “violence” (34, 48%) while 19 (65, 52%) did not respond on a similar way, after a vaginal examination (VE). More patients felt satisfaction (71 out 74/95, 95%) with the use of IU and only 3 (3/4, 05%) felt unease. A different picture was evident in the vaginal examination group. Only 17 patients (17 out 29/58, 62%) felt comfort while 12 (41, 38%) felt unease. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, IU use is well accepted by most of patients, because it could reassure women about their fetal condition. Moreover, they can see the fetus on the screen, while the obstetrician is performing the US and this is important for a visual feedback, in comparison with the classical VE. Elsevier 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10590726/ /pubmed/37876768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100246 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine Malvasi, Antonio Damiani, Gianluca Raffaello DI Naro, Edoardo Vitagliano, Amerigo Dellino, Miriam Achiron, Reuven Ioannis, Kosmas Vimercati, Antonella Gaetani, Maria Cicinelli, Ettore Vinciguerra, Marina Ricci, Ilaria Tinelli, Andrea Baldini, Giorgio Maria Silvestris, Erica Trojano, Giuseppe Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire |
title | Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire |
title_full | Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire |
title_short | Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire |
title_sort | intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: a study with informed consent and questionnaire |
topic | Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malvasiantonio intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT damianigianlucaraffaello intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT dinaroedoardo intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT vitaglianoamerigo intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT dellinomiriam intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT achironreuven intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT ioanniskosmas intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT vimercatiantonella intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT gaetanimaria intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT cicinelliettore intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT vinciguerramarina intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT ricciilaria intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT tinelliandrea intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT baldinigiorgiomaria intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT silvestriserica intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire AT trojanogiuseppe intrapartumultrasoundandmotheracceptanceastudywithinformedconsentandquestionnaire |