Cargando…

Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study

BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy, saftey, and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters after pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon (Cryo-PVI), high-power short-duration (HPSD-PVI), and conventional radiofrequency ablation (conventional-PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. MATERIALS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Hanjin, Park, Je-Wook, Kim, Daehoon, Yu, Hee Tae, Kim, Tae-Hoon, Uhm, Jae-Sun, Joung, Boyoung, Lee, Moon-Hyoung, Hwang, Chun, Pak, Hui-Nam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1238363
_version_ 1785124096993918976
author Park, Hanjin
Park, Je-Wook
Kim, Daehoon
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Joung, Boyoung
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Hwang, Chun
Pak, Hui-Nam
author_facet Park, Hanjin
Park, Je-Wook
Kim, Daehoon
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Joung, Boyoung
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Hwang, Chun
Pak, Hui-Nam
author_sort Park, Hanjin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy, saftey, and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters after pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon (Cryo-PVI), high-power short-duration (HPSD-PVI), and conventional radiofrequency ablation (conventional-PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this propensity score-weighted, retrospective analysis of a single-center cohort, we analyzed 3,395 patients (26.2% female, 74.5% paroxysmal AF) who underwent AF catheter ablation without an empirical left atrial ablation. Procedural factors, recurrence rates, complication rates, and the post-procedural HRV parameters were compared across the Cryo-PVI (n = 625), HPSD-PVI (n = 748), and conventional-PVI (n = 2,022) groups. RESULTS: Despite the shortest procedural time in the Cryo-PVI group (74 min for Cryo-PVI vs. 104 min for HPSD-PVI vs. 153 min for conventional-PVI, p < 0.001), the major complication (p = 0.906) and clinical recurrence rates were similar across the three ablation groups (weighted log-rank, p = 0.824). However, the Cryo-PVI group was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent AF in patients with paroxysmal AF [weighted hazard ratio (WHR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37–0.86], whereas it was associated with a higher risk of recurrent AF in patients with persistent AF (WHR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06–1.89, p for interaction of <0.001) compared with the conventional-PVI group. In the subgroup analysis for the HRV, the Cryo-PVI group had the highest low-frequency-to-high-frequency ratio at 1-year post-procedure, whereas the HPSD-PVI group had the lowest low-frequency-to-high-frequency ratio at 1-year post-procedure (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Cryo-PVI group had better rhythm outcomes in patients with paroxysmal AF but worse rhythm outcomes in patients with persistent AF and a higher long-term post-procedural sympathetic nervous activity and sympatho-vagal balance compared with the conventional-PVI group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10590885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105908852023-10-24 Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study Park, Hanjin Park, Je-Wook Kim, Daehoon Yu, Hee Tae Kim, Tae-Hoon Uhm, Jae-Sun Joung, Boyoung Lee, Moon-Hyoung Hwang, Chun Pak, Hui-Nam Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy, saftey, and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters after pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon (Cryo-PVI), high-power short-duration (HPSD-PVI), and conventional radiofrequency ablation (conventional-PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this propensity score-weighted, retrospective analysis of a single-center cohort, we analyzed 3,395 patients (26.2% female, 74.5% paroxysmal AF) who underwent AF catheter ablation without an empirical left atrial ablation. Procedural factors, recurrence rates, complication rates, and the post-procedural HRV parameters were compared across the Cryo-PVI (n = 625), HPSD-PVI (n = 748), and conventional-PVI (n = 2,022) groups. RESULTS: Despite the shortest procedural time in the Cryo-PVI group (74 min for Cryo-PVI vs. 104 min for HPSD-PVI vs. 153 min for conventional-PVI, p < 0.001), the major complication (p = 0.906) and clinical recurrence rates were similar across the three ablation groups (weighted log-rank, p = 0.824). However, the Cryo-PVI group was associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent AF in patients with paroxysmal AF [weighted hazard ratio (WHR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37–0.86], whereas it was associated with a higher risk of recurrent AF in patients with persistent AF (WHR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06–1.89, p for interaction of <0.001) compared with the conventional-PVI group. In the subgroup analysis for the HRV, the Cryo-PVI group had the highest low-frequency-to-high-frequency ratio at 1-year post-procedure, whereas the HPSD-PVI group had the lowest low-frequency-to-high-frequency ratio at 1-year post-procedure (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Cryo-PVI group had better rhythm outcomes in patients with paroxysmal AF but worse rhythm outcomes in patients with persistent AF and a higher long-term post-procedural sympathetic nervous activity and sympatho-vagal balance compared with the conventional-PVI group. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10590885/ /pubmed/37876772 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1238363 Text en © 2023 Park, Park, Kim, Yu, Kim, Uhm, Joung, Lee, Hwang and Pak. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Park, Hanjin
Park, Je-Wook
Kim, Daehoon
Yu, Hee Tae
Kim, Tae-Hoon
Uhm, Jae-Sun
Joung, Boyoung
Lee, Moon-Hyoung
Hwang, Chun
Pak, Hui-Nam
Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study
title Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study
title_full Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study
title_fullStr Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study
title_short Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study
title_sort comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1238363
work_keys_str_mv AT parkhanjin comparisonofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcryoballoonhighpowershortdurationandconventionalradiofrequencyablationforatrialfibrillationapropensityscoreweightedstudy
AT parkjewook comparisonofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcryoballoonhighpowershortdurationandconventionalradiofrequencyablationforatrialfibrillationapropensityscoreweightedstudy
AT kimdaehoon comparisonofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcryoballoonhighpowershortdurationandconventionalradiofrequencyablationforatrialfibrillationapropensityscoreweightedstudy
AT yuheetae comparisonofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcryoballoonhighpowershortdurationandconventionalradiofrequencyablationforatrialfibrillationapropensityscoreweightedstudy
AT kimtaehoon comparisonofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcryoballoonhighpowershortdurationandconventionalradiofrequencyablationforatrialfibrillationapropensityscoreweightedstudy
AT uhmjaesun comparisonofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcryoballoonhighpowershortdurationandconventionalradiofrequencyablationforatrialfibrillationapropensityscoreweightedstudy
AT joungboyoung comparisonofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcryoballoonhighpowershortdurationandconventionalradiofrequencyablationforatrialfibrillationapropensityscoreweightedstudy
AT leemoonhyoung comparisonofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcryoballoonhighpowershortdurationandconventionalradiofrequencyablationforatrialfibrillationapropensityscoreweightedstudy
AT hwangchun comparisonofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcryoballoonhighpowershortdurationandconventionalradiofrequencyablationforatrialfibrillationapropensityscoreweightedstudy
AT pakhuinam comparisonofpulmonaryveinisolationusingcryoballoonhighpowershortdurationandconventionalradiofrequencyablationforatrialfibrillationapropensityscoreweightedstudy