Cargando…

Computer-aided characterization of early cancer in Barrett’s esophagus on i-scan magnification imaging: a multicenter international study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to develop a computer-aided characterization system that could support the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) on magnification endoscopy. METHODS: Videos were collected in high-definition magnification white-light and virtual chromoendoscopy with i-scan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hussein, Mohamed, Lines, David, González-Bueno Puyal, Juana, Kader, Rawen, Bowman, Nicola, Sehgal, Vinay, Toth, Daniel, Ahmad, Omer F., Everson, Martin, Esteban, Jose Miguel, Bisschops, Raf, Banks, Matthew, Haefner, Michael, Mountney, Peter, Stoyanov, Danail, Lovat, Laurence B., Haidry, Rehan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mosby Yearbook 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.11.020
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We aimed to develop a computer-aided characterization system that could support the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) on magnification endoscopy. METHODS: Videos were collected in high-definition magnification white-light and virtual chromoendoscopy with i-scan (Pentax Hoya, Japan) imaging in patients with dysplastic and nondysplastic BE (NDBE) from 4 centers. We trained a neural network with a Resnet101 architecture to classify frames as dysplastic or nondysplastic. The network was tested on 3 different scenarios: high-quality still images, all available video frames, and a selected sequence within each video. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients, each with videos of magnification areas of BE (34 dysplasia, 23 NDBE), were included. Performance was evaluated by a leave-1-patient-out cross-validation method. In all, 60,174 (39,347 dysplasia, 20,827 NDBE) magnification video frames were used to train the network. The testing set included 49,726 i-scan-3/optical enhancement magnification frames. On 350 high-quality still images, the network achieved a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 86%, and area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) of 96%. On all 49,726 available video frames, the network achieved a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 82%, and AUROC of 95%. On a selected sequence of frames per case (total of 11,471 frames), we used an exponentially weighted moving average of classifications on consecutive frames to characterize dysplasia. The network achieved a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 84%, and AUROC of 96%. The mean assessment speed per frame was 0.0135 seconds (SD ± 0.006). CONCLUSION: Our network can characterize BE dysplasia with high accuracy and speed on high-quality magnification images and sequence of video frames, moving it toward real-time automated diagnosis.