Cargando…

O010 Capturing Localised Electroencephalography Signals During Sleep using Tripolar Concentric Ring Electrodes

INTRODUCTION: Tri -concentric ring electrodes (TCRE) evaluate the current density underlying each electrode and provide improved signal-to-noise compared to conventional electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes. This pilot study used TCRE for the first time to compare TCRE versus more conventional EE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stuart, N, Manners, J, Lechat, B, Ngyuen, P, Kemps, E, Scott, H, Catcheside, P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10591591/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.010
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Tri -concentric ring electrodes (TCRE) evaluate the current density underlying each electrode and provide improved signal-to-noise compared to conventional electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes. This pilot study used TCRE for the first time to compare TCRE versus more conventional EEG signals during sleep . MATERIALS AND METHOD: Twenty healthy sleepers (8 males, mean±SD age 27.8±9.6 y) completed a 9-hr sleep opportunity. Eighteen TCRE electrodes were placed based on the 10-20 system, along with more conventional EEG recorded from the outer rings of paired TCRE electrodes (emulated EEG; eEEG). A Fast Fourier Transform using multitaper-based estimation was applied in 5 second epochs to calculate absolute and relative powers in delta, alpha, theta, sigma and beta frequency bands for eEEG and TCRE signals throughout conventionally scored sleep stages. RESULTS: At the Cz position, TCRE showed reduced relative powers in beta frequency bands across sleep stages compared to eEEG. Further, TCRE demonstrated lower relative beta activity during wake (mean difference [95% confidence lower, upper]; -14%, [-15.9%, -12.1%]), N1 sleep (-5.7%, [-7.6%, -3.7%]), and REM sleep (-4.4%, [-6.3%, -2.5%]). TCRE also recorded higher relative delta power across all stages of sleep and wake. CONCLUSIONS: Lower signal power in high frequency bands and higher power in lower frequency bands supports more favourable signal-to-noise ratio with TCRE compared to more conventional EEG. Thus, TCRE shows promise for evaluating sleep related brain activity. The more focal nature of TCRE recordings may be an additional advantage, that warrants further analysis.