Cargando…
O072 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Alertness State and Driving Impairment during Extended Wakefulness
INTRODUCTION: Driver fatigue contributes to 2-16% of road crashes, highlighting the need for improved detection of at-risk drivers. We used a novel and brief test of vestibular ocular motor system (VOMS) assessed via virtual reality goggles to predict alertness state and driving simulator performanc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10591597/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.072 |
_version_ | 1785124256191873024 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, P Dunbar, C Guyett, A Nguyen, K Bickley, K Reynolds, A Hughes, M Scott, H Adams, R Lack, L Catcheside, P Cori, J Howard, M Anderson, C Lovato, N Vakulin, A |
author_facet | Nguyen, P Dunbar, C Guyett, A Nguyen, K Bickley, K Reynolds, A Hughes, M Scott, H Adams, R Lack, L Catcheside, P Cori, J Howard, M Anderson, C Lovato, N Vakulin, A |
author_sort | Nguyen, P |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Driver fatigue contributes to 2-16% of road crashes, highlighting the need for improved detection of at-risk drivers. We used a novel and brief test of vestibular ocular motor system (VOMS) assessed via virtual reality goggles to predict alertness state and driving simulator performance during 29hr extended wakefulness. METHODS: 49 individuals (Mean±SD Age, 32.6±12.9, 45% Males) undergone 9hr baseline sleep opportunity followed by ~29hrs extended wakefulness with five 60min driving assessments. Cluster analysis, combining steering deviation and number of crashes were used to split participants into groups of either poor vs good driving performance. VOMS assessment was conducted using virtual reality goggles approximately 10mins before and after each drive. Predictive importance of VOMs metrics were ranked using XGBoost machine learning model, which was then utilized to distinguish between poor vs good driving groups. Model performance was evaluated using a 5-fold cross-validation approach using ROC analysis. RESULTS: XGBoost machine learning ranked all 70 VOMS metrics on their importance in predicting driving performance group for each drive. Top 10 metrics from pre-drive VOMS test predicted both daytime driving (tests 1-3, AUC 0.8 [95%CI 0.64-0.93], p<0.001) and night-time driving (tests 4-5, AUC 0.78 [95%CI 0.6-0.95, p<0.001]). Post-driving VOMS assessments also predicted daytime (AUC 0.74 [95%CI 0.53-0.9, p<0.001] and night-time driving (AUC 0.76 [95%CI 0.52-0.94, p<0.001]). CONCLUSION: VOMS assessment show promise as a short and effective assessment of sleepiness to predict driving failure. Future validation in independent samples, sleep disordered population and in-field on-road testing are needed to confirm these promising findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10591597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105915972023-10-24 O072 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Alertness State and Driving Impairment during Extended Wakefulness Nguyen, P Dunbar, C Guyett, A Nguyen, K Bickley, K Reynolds, A Hughes, M Scott, H Adams, R Lack, L Catcheside, P Cori, J Howard, M Anderson, C Lovato, N Vakulin, A Sleep Adv Oral Presentations INTRODUCTION: Driver fatigue contributes to 2-16% of road crashes, highlighting the need for improved detection of at-risk drivers. We used a novel and brief test of vestibular ocular motor system (VOMS) assessed via virtual reality goggles to predict alertness state and driving simulator performance during 29hr extended wakefulness. METHODS: 49 individuals (Mean±SD Age, 32.6±12.9, 45% Males) undergone 9hr baseline sleep opportunity followed by ~29hrs extended wakefulness with five 60min driving assessments. Cluster analysis, combining steering deviation and number of crashes were used to split participants into groups of either poor vs good driving performance. VOMS assessment was conducted using virtual reality goggles approximately 10mins before and after each drive. Predictive importance of VOMs metrics were ranked using XGBoost machine learning model, which was then utilized to distinguish between poor vs good driving groups. Model performance was evaluated using a 5-fold cross-validation approach using ROC analysis. RESULTS: XGBoost machine learning ranked all 70 VOMS metrics on their importance in predicting driving performance group for each drive. Top 10 metrics from pre-drive VOMS test predicted both daytime driving (tests 1-3, AUC 0.8 [95%CI 0.64-0.93], p<0.001) and night-time driving (tests 4-5, AUC 0.78 [95%CI 0.6-0.95, p<0.001]). Post-driving VOMS assessments also predicted daytime (AUC 0.74 [95%CI 0.53-0.9, p<0.001] and night-time driving (AUC 0.76 [95%CI 0.52-0.94, p<0.001]). CONCLUSION: VOMS assessment show promise as a short and effective assessment of sleepiness to predict driving failure. Future validation in independent samples, sleep disordered population and in-field on-road testing are needed to confirm these promising findings. Oxford University Press 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10591597/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.072 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Oral Presentations Nguyen, P Dunbar, C Guyett, A Nguyen, K Bickley, K Reynolds, A Hughes, M Scott, H Adams, R Lack, L Catcheside, P Cori, J Howard, M Anderson, C Lovato, N Vakulin, A O072 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Alertness State and Driving Impairment during Extended Wakefulness |
title | O072 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Alertness State and Driving Impairment during Extended Wakefulness |
title_full | O072 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Alertness State and Driving Impairment during Extended Wakefulness |
title_fullStr | O072 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Alertness State and Driving Impairment during Extended Wakefulness |
title_full_unstemmed | O072 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Alertness State and Driving Impairment during Extended Wakefulness |
title_short | O072 Simple Vestibular-Occular Motor Assessment as a Predictor of Alertness State and Driving Impairment during Extended Wakefulness |
title_sort | o072 simple vestibular-occular motor assessment as a predictor of alertness state and driving impairment during extended wakefulness |
topic | Oral Presentations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10591597/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenp o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT dunbarc o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT guyetta o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT nguyenk o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT bickleyk o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT reynoldsa o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT hughesm o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT scotth o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT adamsr o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT lackl o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT catchesidep o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT corij o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT howardm o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT andersonc o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT lovaton o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness AT vakulina o072simplevestibularoccularmotorassessmentasapredictorofalertnessstateanddrivingimpairmentduringextendedwakefulness |