Cargando…

P078 “It’s very good but it needs to be better”: Usability and Acceptance of Fatigue Detection Technology in Australia.

INTRODUCTION: Fatigue detection technology (FDT) is commonly used in the Australian road transport industry to monitor and/or detect driver fatigue. These devices typically provide alerts to drivers and their organisation if fatigue is detected and aim to reduce incidences of fatigue-related vehicle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sprajcer, M, Ferguson, S, Irwin, S, Naweed, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10591617/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.163
_version_ 1785124260976525312
author Sprajcer, M
Ferguson, S
Irwin, S
Naweed, A
author_facet Sprajcer, M
Ferguson, S
Irwin, S
Naweed, A
author_sort Sprajcer, M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Fatigue detection technology (FDT) is commonly used in the Australian road transport industry to monitor and/or detect driver fatigue. These devices typically provide alerts to drivers and their organisation if fatigue is detected and aim to reduce incidences of fatigue-related vehicle crashes and/or improve driver behaviour. The rise of these technologies is generating debate about how their relative design and merit might be evaluated. However, little is known about the experiences of individuals who use FDTs, including perceptions of use, acceptance, and effects on driver behaviour. The Australian Automobile Association funded the research into FDTs from which this presentation draws. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a range of existing users of FDT (n = 28) between November 2022 and June 2023. Participant groups included drivers (n = 17), middle managers and data users (n = 7), and executives (n = 4) from different commercial organisations that were trialling or had adopted FDT. RESULTS: Preliminary thematic analysis has identified a range of factors underlying driver and organisational acceptance of FDTs. These include: data privacy, vendor support, technical merit, training load, intrusiveness, and cost. Drivers perceived their behaviour to be moderately impacted by FDT in positive and negative ways. This included impacts on sleep/wake behaviour, in-cab activities, and driving performance. Certain types of FDT were considered highly contentious by all existing user groups. DISCUSSION: FDT adds further complexity to the contentious topic of fatigue management for professional drivers. Findings highlight a range of implications for FDT adoption and effective evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10591617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105916172023-10-24 P078 “It’s very good but it needs to be better”: Usability and Acceptance of Fatigue Detection Technology in Australia. Sprajcer, M Ferguson, S Irwin, S Naweed, A Sleep Adv Poster Discussion Presentations INTRODUCTION: Fatigue detection technology (FDT) is commonly used in the Australian road transport industry to monitor and/or detect driver fatigue. These devices typically provide alerts to drivers and their organisation if fatigue is detected and aim to reduce incidences of fatigue-related vehicle crashes and/or improve driver behaviour. The rise of these technologies is generating debate about how their relative design and merit might be evaluated. However, little is known about the experiences of individuals who use FDTs, including perceptions of use, acceptance, and effects on driver behaviour. The Australian Automobile Association funded the research into FDTs from which this presentation draws. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a range of existing users of FDT (n = 28) between November 2022 and June 2023. Participant groups included drivers (n = 17), middle managers and data users (n = 7), and executives (n = 4) from different commercial organisations that were trialling or had adopted FDT. RESULTS: Preliminary thematic analysis has identified a range of factors underlying driver and organisational acceptance of FDTs. These include: data privacy, vendor support, technical merit, training load, intrusiveness, and cost. Drivers perceived their behaviour to be moderately impacted by FDT in positive and negative ways. This included impacts on sleep/wake behaviour, in-cab activities, and driving performance. Certain types of FDT were considered highly contentious by all existing user groups. DISCUSSION: FDT adds further complexity to the contentious topic of fatigue management for professional drivers. Findings highlight a range of implications for FDT adoption and effective evaluation. Oxford University Press 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10591617/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.163 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Discussion Presentations
Sprajcer, M
Ferguson, S
Irwin, S
Naweed, A
P078 “It’s very good but it needs to be better”: Usability and Acceptance of Fatigue Detection Technology in Australia.
title P078 “It’s very good but it needs to be better”: Usability and Acceptance of Fatigue Detection Technology in Australia.
title_full P078 “It’s very good but it needs to be better”: Usability and Acceptance of Fatigue Detection Technology in Australia.
title_fullStr P078 “It’s very good but it needs to be better”: Usability and Acceptance of Fatigue Detection Technology in Australia.
title_full_unstemmed P078 “It’s very good but it needs to be better”: Usability and Acceptance of Fatigue Detection Technology in Australia.
title_short P078 “It’s very good but it needs to be better”: Usability and Acceptance of Fatigue Detection Technology in Australia.
title_sort p078 “it’s very good but it needs to be better”: usability and acceptance of fatigue detection technology in australia.
topic Poster Discussion Presentations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10591617/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.163
work_keys_str_mv AT sprajcerm p078itsverygoodbutitneedstobebetterusabilityandacceptanceoffatiguedetectiontechnologyinaustralia
AT fergusons p078itsverygoodbutitneedstobebetterusabilityandacceptanceoffatiguedetectiontechnologyinaustralia
AT irwins p078itsverygoodbutitneedstobebetterusabilityandacceptanceoffatiguedetectiontechnologyinaustralia
AT naweeda p078itsverygoodbutitneedstobebetterusabilityandacceptanceoffatiguedetectiontechnologyinaustralia