Cargando…

O067 Comparison of Sleep Quantity and Quality during Watchkeeping Schedules

Watchkeeping schedules expose workers to sleep and wake opportunities which are not at biologically ideal times, thus impacting sleep quantity and quality. This study investigated the impact of different watchkeeping schedules on sleep. N=29 healthy participants (16F; aged 18-34y) took part in a 10-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marando, I, Owen, M, Lushington, K, Matthews, R, Yates, C, Banks, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10591649/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.067
_version_ 1785124268553535488
author Marando, I
Owen, M
Lushington, K
Matthews, R
Yates, C
Banks, S
author_facet Marando, I
Owen, M
Lushington, K
Matthews, R
Yates, C
Banks, S
author_sort Marando, I
collection PubMed
description Watchkeeping schedules expose workers to sleep and wake opportunities which are not at biologically ideal times, thus impacting sleep quantity and quality. This study investigated the impact of different watchkeeping schedules on sleep. N=29 healthy participants (16F; aged 18-34y) took part in a 10-day laboratory study. Participants were allocated to one of four schedules; 8h-on/8h-off/4h-on/4h-off (day-sleep 09:30-16:00; n=8; Condition A), 6h-on/6h-off (day-sleep 08:30h-12:30, nap 21:30-00:00; n=7; Condition B), and 4h-on/4h-on-call/4h-off/4h-on/8h-off (evening-sleep 18:00-00:30; n=7; Condition C; or night-sleep 01:30h-08:00; n=7; Condition D). Participants had 8h time in bed (TIB) for sleep at baseline and recovery. Every 24h during the schedule, participants received a 6.5h TIB. Sleep was measured using standard polysomnography and scored by a trained sleep technician. Linear mixed models found that Condition D (night sleep) had significantly longer total sleep time (TST) than Condition B (p=.003; split sleep). Participants obtained significantly less TST on Day 2 compared to remaining experimental days (Day 3 to Day 8; p<.05). Sleep onset latency was longer on Day 8, than Days 2 and 3 (p<.01). Time spent in REM sleep was shorter on Days 2 and 3 than any other days (p<.05). There were no differences in sleep stages between conditions, except for TST. The split sleep in Condition B resulted in less sleep. Shorter TST at the beginning of the study may indicate the adjustment period of the new sleep/wake schedule. These results reveal that there are implications for sleep when sleep periods are reduced during watchkeeping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10591649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105916492023-10-24 O067 Comparison of Sleep Quantity and Quality during Watchkeeping Schedules Marando, I Owen, M Lushington, K Matthews, R Yates, C Banks, S Sleep Adv Oral Presentations Watchkeeping schedules expose workers to sleep and wake opportunities which are not at biologically ideal times, thus impacting sleep quantity and quality. This study investigated the impact of different watchkeeping schedules on sleep. N=29 healthy participants (16F; aged 18-34y) took part in a 10-day laboratory study. Participants were allocated to one of four schedules; 8h-on/8h-off/4h-on/4h-off (day-sleep 09:30-16:00; n=8; Condition A), 6h-on/6h-off (day-sleep 08:30h-12:30, nap 21:30-00:00; n=7; Condition B), and 4h-on/4h-on-call/4h-off/4h-on/8h-off (evening-sleep 18:00-00:30; n=7; Condition C; or night-sleep 01:30h-08:00; n=7; Condition D). Participants had 8h time in bed (TIB) for sleep at baseline and recovery. Every 24h during the schedule, participants received a 6.5h TIB. Sleep was measured using standard polysomnography and scored by a trained sleep technician. Linear mixed models found that Condition D (night sleep) had significantly longer total sleep time (TST) than Condition B (p=.003; split sleep). Participants obtained significantly less TST on Day 2 compared to remaining experimental days (Day 3 to Day 8; p<.05). Sleep onset latency was longer on Day 8, than Days 2 and 3 (p<.01). Time spent in REM sleep was shorter on Days 2 and 3 than any other days (p<.05). There were no differences in sleep stages between conditions, except for TST. The split sleep in Condition B resulted in less sleep. Shorter TST at the beginning of the study may indicate the adjustment period of the new sleep/wake schedule. These results reveal that there are implications for sleep when sleep periods are reduced during watchkeeping. Oxford University Press 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10591649/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.067 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Oral Presentations
Marando, I
Owen, M
Lushington, K
Matthews, R
Yates, C
Banks, S
O067 Comparison of Sleep Quantity and Quality during Watchkeeping Schedules
title O067 Comparison of Sleep Quantity and Quality during Watchkeeping Schedules
title_full O067 Comparison of Sleep Quantity and Quality during Watchkeeping Schedules
title_fullStr O067 Comparison of Sleep Quantity and Quality during Watchkeeping Schedules
title_full_unstemmed O067 Comparison of Sleep Quantity and Quality during Watchkeeping Schedules
title_short O067 Comparison of Sleep Quantity and Quality during Watchkeeping Schedules
title_sort o067 comparison of sleep quantity and quality during watchkeeping schedules
topic Oral Presentations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10591649/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.067
work_keys_str_mv AT marandoi o067comparisonofsleepquantityandqualityduringwatchkeepingschedules
AT owenm o067comparisonofsleepquantityandqualityduringwatchkeepingschedules
AT lushingtonk o067comparisonofsleepquantityandqualityduringwatchkeepingschedules
AT matthewsr o067comparisonofsleepquantityandqualityduringwatchkeepingschedules
AT yatesc o067comparisonofsleepquantityandqualityduringwatchkeepingschedules
AT bankss o067comparisonofsleepquantityandqualityduringwatchkeepingschedules