Cargando…

TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS: A COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR APPROACH AND TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results and complications of patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis performed by the transfibular approach and anterior approach in end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2022, 41 patients who satisfied...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DÜNDAR, ABDULRAHIM, IPEK, DENIZ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: ATHA EDITORA 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10592366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233105e267148
_version_ 1785124307213484032
author DÜNDAR, ABDULRAHIM
IPEK, DENIZ
author_facet DÜNDAR, ABDULRAHIM
IPEK, DENIZ
author_sort DÜNDAR, ABDULRAHIM
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results and complications of patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis performed by the transfibular approach and anterior approach in end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2022, 41 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria for this retrospective comparative analysis were included. Of them, 19 patients are included in the anterior approach group and 22 patients are included in the transfibular approach group. The mean age of the participants is 58.9 years. Collected data included the BMI, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scale, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, diabetes, smoking, time to fusion, nonunion, union rate, preoperative and postoperative coronal tibiotalar angle and complications. RESULT: The mean time to bone union was 14.3 weeks (range 11-17 weeks) in the anterior approach group, and 11.3 weeks in the transfibular approach group. Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. Nonunion occurred in one case in the transfibular approach group and three cases in the anterior approach group. There was no significant difference in the nonunion rate between the both groups (p = 0.321). VAS score, and AOFAS score of the two groups were similar and no significant differences were found (p = 0.491, p = 0.448, p = 0.146, p = 0.073, p = 0.173, p = 0.506, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A stable and firm ankle arthrodesis and plantigrade foot can be achieved with both transfibular approach and anterior approach technique. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10592366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher ATHA EDITORA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105923662023-10-24 TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS: A COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR APPROACH AND TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH DÜNDAR, ABDULRAHIM IPEK, DENIZ Acta Ortop Bras Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results and complications of patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis performed by the transfibular approach and anterior approach in end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2022, 41 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria for this retrospective comparative analysis were included. Of them, 19 patients are included in the anterior approach group and 22 patients are included in the transfibular approach group. The mean age of the participants is 58.9 years. Collected data included the BMI, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scale, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, diabetes, smoking, time to fusion, nonunion, union rate, preoperative and postoperative coronal tibiotalar angle and complications. RESULT: The mean time to bone union was 14.3 weeks (range 11-17 weeks) in the anterior approach group, and 11.3 weeks in the transfibular approach group. Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. Nonunion occurred in one case in the transfibular approach group and three cases in the anterior approach group. There was no significant difference in the nonunion rate between the both groups (p = 0.321). VAS score, and AOFAS score of the two groups were similar and no significant differences were found (p = 0.491, p = 0.448, p = 0.146, p = 0.073, p = 0.173, p = 0.506, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A stable and firm ankle arthrodesis and plantigrade foot can be achieved with both transfibular approach and anterior approach technique. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study. ATHA EDITORA 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10592366/ /pubmed/37876863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233105e267148 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
DÜNDAR, ABDULRAHIM
IPEK, DENIZ
TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS: A COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR APPROACH AND TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH
title TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS: A COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR APPROACH AND TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH
title_full TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS: A COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR APPROACH AND TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH
title_fullStr TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS: A COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR APPROACH AND TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH
title_full_unstemmed TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS: A COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR APPROACH AND TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH
title_short TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS: A COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR APPROACH AND TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH
title_sort tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis: a comparison of anterior approach and transfibular approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10592366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233105e267148
work_keys_str_mv AT dundarabdulrahim tibiocalcanealarthrodesisacomparisonofanteriorapproachandtransfibularapproach
AT ipekdeniz tibiocalcanealarthrodesisacomparisonofanteriorapproachandtransfibularapproach