Cargando…
Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the United States: Results from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample
BACKGROUND: Despite its approval for use in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) >25 years ago, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains underutilized, with inequities by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and geography. Little is known about IVT rates by insurance status. We aimed to assess temporal trends in the i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10592994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37873114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.09.23296783 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Despite its approval for use in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) >25 years ago, intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains underutilized, with inequities by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and geography. Little is known about IVT rates by insurance status. We aimed to assess temporal trends in the inequities in IVT use. METHODS: We assessed trends from 2002 to 2015 in IVT for AIS in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample by sex, age, race/ethnicity, hospital location/teaching status, and insurance, using survey-weighted logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. We calculated odds ratios for IVT for each category in 2002–2008 (Period 1) and 2009–2015 (Period 2). RESULTS: Among AIS patients (weighted N=6,694,081), IVT increased from 1.0% in 2002 to 6.8% in 2015 (adjusted annual relative ratio (AARR) 1.15, 95% CI 1.14–1.16). Individuals ≥85 years had the most pronounced increase from 2002 to 2015 (AARR 1.18, 1.17–1.19), but were less likely to receive IVT compared to those aged 18–44 years in both Period 1 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.23, 0.21–0.26) and Period 2 (aOR 0.36, 0.34–0.38). Women were less likely than men to receive IVT, but the disparity narrowed over time (Period 1 aOR 0.81, 0.78–0.84, Period 2 aOR 0.94, 0.92–0.97). Inequities in IVT by race/ethnicity resolved for Hispanic individuals in Period 2 but not for Black individuals (Period 2 aOR 0.81, 0.78–0.85). The disparity in IVT for Medicare patients, compared to privately insured patients, lessened over time (Period 1 aOR 0.59, 0.56–0.52, Period 2 aOR 0.75, 0.72–0.77). Patients treated in rural hospitals were less likely to receive IVT than those treated in urban hospitals; a more dramatic increase in urban areas widened the inequity (Period 2 urban non-teaching vs. rural aOR 2.58, 2.33–2.85, urban teaching vs. rural aOR 3.90, 3.55–4.28). CONCLUSION: From 2002 through 2015, IVT for AIS increased among adults. Despite encouraging trends, only 1 in 15 AIS patients received IVT and persistent inequities remained for Black individuals, women, government-insured, and those treated in rural areas, highlighting the need for intensified efforts at addressing inequities. |
---|