Cargando…
Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses
Retinal Müller glia (MG) can act as stem-like cells to generate new neurons in both zebrafish and mice. In zebrafish, retinal regeneration is innate and robust, resulting in the replacement of lost neurons and restoration of visual function. In mice, exogenous stimulation of MG is required to reveal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37819938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010905 |
_version_ | 1785124411930574848 |
---|---|
author | Emmerich, Kevin Walker, Steven L. Wang, Guohua White, David T. Ceisel, Anneliese Wang, Fang Teng, Yong Chunawala, Zeeshaan Graziano, Gianna Nimmagadda, Saumya Saxena, Meera T. Qian, Jiang Mumm, Jeff S. |
author_facet | Emmerich, Kevin Walker, Steven L. Wang, Guohua White, David T. Ceisel, Anneliese Wang, Fang Teng, Yong Chunawala, Zeeshaan Graziano, Gianna Nimmagadda, Saumya Saxena, Meera T. Qian, Jiang Mumm, Jeff S. |
author_sort | Emmerich, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Retinal Müller glia (MG) can act as stem-like cells to generate new neurons in both zebrafish and mice. In zebrafish, retinal regeneration is innate and robust, resulting in the replacement of lost neurons and restoration of visual function. In mice, exogenous stimulation of MG is required to reveal a dormant and, to date, limited regenerative capacity. Zebrafish studies have been key in revealing factors that promote regenerative responses in the mammalian eye. Increased understanding of how the regenerative potential of MG is regulated in zebrafish may therefore aid efforts to promote retinal repair therapeutically. Developmental signaling pathways are known to coordinate regeneration following widespread retinal cell loss. In contrast, less is known about how regeneration is regulated in the context of retinal degenerative disease, i.e., following the loss of specific retinal cell types. To address this knowledge gap, we compared transcriptomic responses underlying regeneration following targeted loss of rod photoreceptors or bipolar cells. In total, 2,531 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, with the majority being paradigm specific, including during early MG activation phases, suggesting the nature of the injury/cell loss informs the regenerative process from initiation onward. For example, early modulation of Notch signaling was implicated in the rod but not bipolar cell ablation paradigm and components of JAK/STAT signaling were implicated in both paradigms. To examine candidate gene roles in rod cell regeneration, including several immune-related factors, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to create G0 mutant larvae (i.e., “crispants”). Rod cell regeneration was inhibited in stat3 crispants, while mutating stat5a/b, c7b and txn accelerated rod regeneration kinetics. These data support emerging evidence that discrete responses follow from selective retinal cell loss and that the immune system plays a key role in regulating “fate-biased” regenerative processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10593236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105932362023-10-24 Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses Emmerich, Kevin Walker, Steven L. Wang, Guohua White, David T. Ceisel, Anneliese Wang, Fang Teng, Yong Chunawala, Zeeshaan Graziano, Gianna Nimmagadda, Saumya Saxena, Meera T. Qian, Jiang Mumm, Jeff S. PLoS Genet Research Article Retinal Müller glia (MG) can act as stem-like cells to generate new neurons in both zebrafish and mice. In zebrafish, retinal regeneration is innate and robust, resulting in the replacement of lost neurons and restoration of visual function. In mice, exogenous stimulation of MG is required to reveal a dormant and, to date, limited regenerative capacity. Zebrafish studies have been key in revealing factors that promote regenerative responses in the mammalian eye. Increased understanding of how the regenerative potential of MG is regulated in zebrafish may therefore aid efforts to promote retinal repair therapeutically. Developmental signaling pathways are known to coordinate regeneration following widespread retinal cell loss. In contrast, less is known about how regeneration is regulated in the context of retinal degenerative disease, i.e., following the loss of specific retinal cell types. To address this knowledge gap, we compared transcriptomic responses underlying regeneration following targeted loss of rod photoreceptors or bipolar cells. In total, 2,531 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, with the majority being paradigm specific, including during early MG activation phases, suggesting the nature of the injury/cell loss informs the regenerative process from initiation onward. For example, early modulation of Notch signaling was implicated in the rod but not bipolar cell ablation paradigm and components of JAK/STAT signaling were implicated in both paradigms. To examine candidate gene roles in rod cell regeneration, including several immune-related factors, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to create G0 mutant larvae (i.e., “crispants”). Rod cell regeneration was inhibited in stat3 crispants, while mutating stat5a/b, c7b and txn accelerated rod regeneration kinetics. These data support emerging evidence that discrete responses follow from selective retinal cell loss and that the immune system plays a key role in regulating “fate-biased” regenerative processes. Public Library of Science 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10593236/ /pubmed/37819938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010905 Text en © 2023 Emmerich et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Emmerich, Kevin Walker, Steven L. Wang, Guohua White, David T. Ceisel, Anneliese Wang, Fang Teng, Yong Chunawala, Zeeshaan Graziano, Gianna Nimmagadda, Saumya Saxena, Meera T. Qian, Jiang Mumm, Jeff S. Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses |
title | Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses |
title_full | Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses |
title_fullStr | Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses |
title_short | Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses |
title_sort | transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37819938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010905 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emmerichkevin transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT walkerstevenl transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT wangguohua transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT whitedavidt transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT ceiselanneliese transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT wangfang transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT tengyong transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT chunawalazeeshaan transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT grazianogianna transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT nimmagaddasaumya transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT saxenameerat transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT qianjiang transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses AT mummjeffs transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses |