Cargando…

Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses

Retinal Müller glia (MG) can act as stem-like cells to generate new neurons in both zebrafish and mice. In zebrafish, retinal regeneration is innate and robust, resulting in the replacement of lost neurons and restoration of visual function. In mice, exogenous stimulation of MG is required to reveal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emmerich, Kevin, Walker, Steven L., Wang, Guohua, White, David T., Ceisel, Anneliese, Wang, Fang, Teng, Yong, Chunawala, Zeeshaan, Graziano, Gianna, Nimmagadda, Saumya, Saxena, Meera T., Qian, Jiang, Mumm, Jeff S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37819938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010905
_version_ 1785124411930574848
author Emmerich, Kevin
Walker, Steven L.
Wang, Guohua
White, David T.
Ceisel, Anneliese
Wang, Fang
Teng, Yong
Chunawala, Zeeshaan
Graziano, Gianna
Nimmagadda, Saumya
Saxena, Meera T.
Qian, Jiang
Mumm, Jeff S.
author_facet Emmerich, Kevin
Walker, Steven L.
Wang, Guohua
White, David T.
Ceisel, Anneliese
Wang, Fang
Teng, Yong
Chunawala, Zeeshaan
Graziano, Gianna
Nimmagadda, Saumya
Saxena, Meera T.
Qian, Jiang
Mumm, Jeff S.
author_sort Emmerich, Kevin
collection PubMed
description Retinal Müller glia (MG) can act as stem-like cells to generate new neurons in both zebrafish and mice. In zebrafish, retinal regeneration is innate and robust, resulting in the replacement of lost neurons and restoration of visual function. In mice, exogenous stimulation of MG is required to reveal a dormant and, to date, limited regenerative capacity. Zebrafish studies have been key in revealing factors that promote regenerative responses in the mammalian eye. Increased understanding of how the regenerative potential of MG is regulated in zebrafish may therefore aid efforts to promote retinal repair therapeutically. Developmental signaling pathways are known to coordinate regeneration following widespread retinal cell loss. In contrast, less is known about how regeneration is regulated in the context of retinal degenerative disease, i.e., following the loss of specific retinal cell types. To address this knowledge gap, we compared transcriptomic responses underlying regeneration following targeted loss of rod photoreceptors or bipolar cells. In total, 2,531 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, with the majority being paradigm specific, including during early MG activation phases, suggesting the nature of the injury/cell loss informs the regenerative process from initiation onward. For example, early modulation of Notch signaling was implicated in the rod but not bipolar cell ablation paradigm and components of JAK/STAT signaling were implicated in both paradigms. To examine candidate gene roles in rod cell regeneration, including several immune-related factors, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to create G0 mutant larvae (i.e., “crispants”). Rod cell regeneration was inhibited in stat3 crispants, while mutating stat5a/b, c7b and txn accelerated rod regeneration kinetics. These data support emerging evidence that discrete responses follow from selective retinal cell loss and that the immune system plays a key role in regulating “fate-biased” regenerative processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10593236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105932362023-10-24 Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses Emmerich, Kevin Walker, Steven L. Wang, Guohua White, David T. Ceisel, Anneliese Wang, Fang Teng, Yong Chunawala, Zeeshaan Graziano, Gianna Nimmagadda, Saumya Saxena, Meera T. Qian, Jiang Mumm, Jeff S. PLoS Genet Research Article Retinal Müller glia (MG) can act as stem-like cells to generate new neurons in both zebrafish and mice. In zebrafish, retinal regeneration is innate and robust, resulting in the replacement of lost neurons and restoration of visual function. In mice, exogenous stimulation of MG is required to reveal a dormant and, to date, limited regenerative capacity. Zebrafish studies have been key in revealing factors that promote regenerative responses in the mammalian eye. Increased understanding of how the regenerative potential of MG is regulated in zebrafish may therefore aid efforts to promote retinal repair therapeutically. Developmental signaling pathways are known to coordinate regeneration following widespread retinal cell loss. In contrast, less is known about how regeneration is regulated in the context of retinal degenerative disease, i.e., following the loss of specific retinal cell types. To address this knowledge gap, we compared transcriptomic responses underlying regeneration following targeted loss of rod photoreceptors or bipolar cells. In total, 2,531 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, with the majority being paradigm specific, including during early MG activation phases, suggesting the nature of the injury/cell loss informs the regenerative process from initiation onward. For example, early modulation of Notch signaling was implicated in the rod but not bipolar cell ablation paradigm and components of JAK/STAT signaling were implicated in both paradigms. To examine candidate gene roles in rod cell regeneration, including several immune-related factors, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to create G0 mutant larvae (i.e., “crispants”). Rod cell regeneration was inhibited in stat3 crispants, while mutating stat5a/b, c7b and txn accelerated rod regeneration kinetics. These data support emerging evidence that discrete responses follow from selective retinal cell loss and that the immune system plays a key role in regulating “fate-biased” regenerative processes. Public Library of Science 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10593236/ /pubmed/37819938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010905 Text en © 2023 Emmerich et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Emmerich, Kevin
Walker, Steven L.
Wang, Guohua
White, David T.
Ceisel, Anneliese
Wang, Fang
Teng, Yong
Chunawala, Zeeshaan
Graziano, Gianna
Nimmagadda, Saumya
Saxena, Meera T.
Qian, Jiang
Mumm, Jeff S.
Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses
title Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses
title_full Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses
title_fullStr Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses
title_full_unstemmed Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses
title_short Transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses
title_sort transcriptomic comparison of two selective retinal cell ablation paradigms in zebrafish reveals shared and cell-specific regenerative responses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37819938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1010905
work_keys_str_mv AT emmerichkevin transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT walkerstevenl transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT wangguohua transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT whitedavidt transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT ceiselanneliese transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT wangfang transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT tengyong transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT chunawalazeeshaan transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT grazianogianna transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT nimmagaddasaumya transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT saxenameerat transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT qianjiang transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses
AT mummjeffs transcriptomiccomparisonoftwoselectiveretinalcellablationparadigmsinzebrafishrevealssharedandcellspecificregenerativeresponses