Cargando…
Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP): Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a complex intervention for medication optimization against usual care
INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is increasingly common, and associated with undesirable consequences. Polypharmacy management necessitates balancing therapeutic benefits and risks, and varying clinical and patient priorities. Current guidance for managing polypharmacy is not supported by high quality evi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37881305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13285.1 |
_version_ | 1785124431088058368 |
---|---|
author | Payne, Rupert A. Blair, Peter S. Caddick, Barbara Chew-Graham, Carolyn A. Dreischulte, Tobias Duncan, Lorna J. Guthrie, Bruce Mann, Cindy Parslow, Roxanne M. Round, Jeff Salisbury, Chris Turner, Katrina M. Turner, Nicholas L. McCahon, Deborah |
author_facet | Payne, Rupert A. Blair, Peter S. Caddick, Barbara Chew-Graham, Carolyn A. Dreischulte, Tobias Duncan, Lorna J. Guthrie, Bruce Mann, Cindy Parslow, Roxanne M. Round, Jeff Salisbury, Chris Turner, Katrina M. Turner, Nicholas L. McCahon, Deborah |
author_sort | Payne, Rupert A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is increasingly common, and associated with undesirable consequences. Polypharmacy management necessitates balancing therapeutic benefits and risks, and varying clinical and patient priorities. Current guidance for managing polypharmacy is not supported by high quality evidence. The aim of the Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP) trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to optimise medication use for patients with polypharmacy in a general practice setting. METHODS: This trial will use a multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomised controlled approach, with two parallel groups. Practices will be randomised to a complex intervention comprising structured medication review (including interprofessional GP/pharmacist treatment planning and patient-facing review) supported by performance feedback, financial incentivisation, clinician training and clinical informatics (intervention), or usual care (control). Patients with polypharmacy and triggering potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) indicators will be recruited in each practice using a computerised search of health records. 37 practices will recruit 50 patients, and review them over a 26-week intervention delivery period. The primary outcome is the mean number of PIP indicators triggered per patient at 26 weeks follow-up, determined objectively from coded GP electronic health records. Secondary outcomes will include patient reported outcome measures, and health and care service use. The main intention-to-treat analysis will use linear mixed effects regression to compare number of PIP indicators triggered at 26 weeks post-review between groups, adjusted for baseline (pre-randomisation) values. A nested process evaluation will explore implementation of the intervention in primary care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol and associated study materials have been approved by the Wales REC 6, NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 19/WA/0090), host institution and Health Research Authority. Research outputs will be published in peer-reviewed journals and relevant conferences, and additionally disseminated to patients and the public, clinicians, commissioners and policy makers. ISRCTN REGISTRATION: 90146150 (28/03/2019) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10593356 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105933562023-10-25 Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP): Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a complex intervention for medication optimization against usual care Payne, Rupert A. Blair, Peter S. Caddick, Barbara Chew-Graham, Carolyn A. Dreischulte, Tobias Duncan, Lorna J. Guthrie, Bruce Mann, Cindy Parslow, Roxanne M. Round, Jeff Salisbury, Chris Turner, Katrina M. Turner, Nicholas L. McCahon, Deborah NIHR Open Res Study Protocol INTRODUCTION: Polypharmacy is increasingly common, and associated with undesirable consequences. Polypharmacy management necessitates balancing therapeutic benefits and risks, and varying clinical and patient priorities. Current guidance for managing polypharmacy is not supported by high quality evidence. The aim of the Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP) trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to optimise medication use for patients with polypharmacy in a general practice setting. METHODS: This trial will use a multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomised controlled approach, with two parallel groups. Practices will be randomised to a complex intervention comprising structured medication review (including interprofessional GP/pharmacist treatment planning and patient-facing review) supported by performance feedback, financial incentivisation, clinician training and clinical informatics (intervention), or usual care (control). Patients with polypharmacy and triggering potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) indicators will be recruited in each practice using a computerised search of health records. 37 practices will recruit 50 patients, and review them over a 26-week intervention delivery period. The primary outcome is the mean number of PIP indicators triggered per patient at 26 weeks follow-up, determined objectively from coded GP electronic health records. Secondary outcomes will include patient reported outcome measures, and health and care service use. The main intention-to-treat analysis will use linear mixed effects regression to compare number of PIP indicators triggered at 26 weeks post-review between groups, adjusted for baseline (pre-randomisation) values. A nested process evaluation will explore implementation of the intervention in primary care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol and associated study materials have been approved by the Wales REC 6, NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 19/WA/0090), host institution and Health Research Authority. Research outputs will be published in peer-reviewed journals and relevant conferences, and additionally disseminated to patients and the public, clinicians, commissioners and policy makers. ISRCTN REGISTRATION: 90146150 (28/03/2019) F1000 Research Limited 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10593356/ /pubmed/37881305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13285.1 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Payne RA et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Payne, Rupert A. Blair, Peter S. Caddick, Barbara Chew-Graham, Carolyn A. Dreischulte, Tobias Duncan, Lorna J. Guthrie, Bruce Mann, Cindy Parslow, Roxanne M. Round, Jeff Salisbury, Chris Turner, Katrina M. Turner, Nicholas L. McCahon, Deborah Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP): Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a complex intervention for medication optimization against usual care |
title | Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP): Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a complex intervention for medication optimization against usual care |
title_full | Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP): Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a complex intervention for medication optimization against usual care |
title_fullStr | Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP): Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a complex intervention for medication optimization against usual care |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP): Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a complex intervention for medication optimization against usual care |
title_short | Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP): Protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a complex intervention for medication optimization against usual care |
title_sort | improving medicines use in people with polypharmacy in primary care (imppp): protocol for a multicentre cluster randomised trial comparing a complex intervention for medication optimization against usual care |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37881305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13285.1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT payneruperta improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT blairpeters improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT caddickbarbara improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT chewgrahamcarolyna improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT dreischultetobias improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT duncanlornaj improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT guthriebruce improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT manncindy improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT parslowroxannem improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT roundjeff improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT salisburychris improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT turnerkatrinam improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT turnernicholasl improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare AT mccahondeborah improvingmedicinesuseinpeoplewithpolypharmacyinprimarycareimpppprotocolforamulticentreclusterrandomisedtrialcomparingacomplexinterventionformedicationoptimizationagainstusualcare |