Cargando…

Does the Number of Stimuli Influence the Formation of the Endogenous Components of the Event-Related Auditory Evoked Potentials?

Introduction  The number of stimuli is important to determine the quality of auditory evoked potential records. However, there is no consensus on that number in studies, especially in the sample studied. Objectives  To investigate the influence of the number of rare stimuli on forming N2 and P3 comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliveira, Yorran Marques de, Calderaro, Victor Goiris, Massuda, Eduardo Tanaka, Zanchetta, Sthella, Simões, Humberto de Oliveira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759605
_version_ 1785124462068236288
author Oliveira, Yorran Marques de
Calderaro, Victor Goiris
Massuda, Eduardo Tanaka
Zanchetta, Sthella
Simões, Humberto de Oliveira
author_facet Oliveira, Yorran Marques de
Calderaro, Victor Goiris
Massuda, Eduardo Tanaka
Zanchetta, Sthella
Simões, Humberto de Oliveira
author_sort Oliveira, Yorran Marques de
collection PubMed
description Introduction  The number of stimuli is important to determine the quality of auditory evoked potential records. However, there is no consensus on that number in studies, especially in the sample studied. Objectives  To investigate the influence of the number of rare stimuli on forming N2 and P3 components, with different types of acoustic stimuli. Methods  Cross-sectional, descriptive, comparative study, approved by the ethics committee of the institution. The sample comprised 20 normal hearing adults of both sexes, aged 18 to 29 years old, with normal scores in the mental state examination and auditory processing skills. The event-related auditory evoked potentials were performed with nonverbal (1 kHz versus 2 kHz) and verbal stimuli (/BA/ versus /DA/). The number of rare stimuli varied randomly in the recordings, with 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 presentations. Results  P3 latency was significantly higher for nonverbal stimuli with 50 rare stimuli. N2 latency did not show any difference between the type and number of stimuli. The absolute P3 and N2-P3 amplitudes showed significant differences for both types of stimuli, with higher amplitude for 10 rare stimuli, in contrast with the other ones. The linear tendency test indicated significance only for the amplitude – as the number of rare stimuli increased, the amplitude tended to decrease. Conclusion  The components were identifiable in the different numbers of rare stimuli and types of stimuli. The P3 and N2-P3 latency and amplitude increased with fewer verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Recording protocols must consider the number of rare stimuli.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10593534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105935342023-10-24 Does the Number of Stimuli Influence the Formation of the Endogenous Components of the Event-Related Auditory Evoked Potentials? Oliveira, Yorran Marques de Calderaro, Victor Goiris Massuda, Eduardo Tanaka Zanchetta, Sthella Simões, Humberto de Oliveira Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction  The number of stimuli is important to determine the quality of auditory evoked potential records. However, there is no consensus on that number in studies, especially in the sample studied. Objectives  To investigate the influence of the number of rare stimuli on forming N2 and P3 components, with different types of acoustic stimuli. Methods  Cross-sectional, descriptive, comparative study, approved by the ethics committee of the institution. The sample comprised 20 normal hearing adults of both sexes, aged 18 to 29 years old, with normal scores in the mental state examination and auditory processing skills. The event-related auditory evoked potentials were performed with nonverbal (1 kHz versus 2 kHz) and verbal stimuli (/BA/ versus /DA/). The number of rare stimuli varied randomly in the recordings, with 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 presentations. Results  P3 latency was significantly higher for nonverbal stimuli with 50 rare stimuli. N2 latency did not show any difference between the type and number of stimuli. The absolute P3 and N2-P3 amplitudes showed significant differences for both types of stimuli, with higher amplitude for 10 rare stimuli, in contrast with the other ones. The linear tendency test indicated significance only for the amplitude – as the number of rare stimuli increased, the amplitude tended to decrease. Conclusion  The components were identifiable in the different numbers of rare stimuli and types of stimuli. The P3 and N2-P3 latency and amplitude increased with fewer verbal and nonverbal stimuli. Recording protocols must consider the number of rare stimuli. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10593534/ /pubmed/37876687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759605 Text en Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oliveira, Yorran Marques de
Calderaro, Victor Goiris
Massuda, Eduardo Tanaka
Zanchetta, Sthella
Simões, Humberto de Oliveira
Does the Number of Stimuli Influence the Formation of the Endogenous Components of the Event-Related Auditory Evoked Potentials?
title Does the Number of Stimuli Influence the Formation of the Endogenous Components of the Event-Related Auditory Evoked Potentials?
title_full Does the Number of Stimuli Influence the Formation of the Endogenous Components of the Event-Related Auditory Evoked Potentials?
title_fullStr Does the Number of Stimuli Influence the Formation of the Endogenous Components of the Event-Related Auditory Evoked Potentials?
title_full_unstemmed Does the Number of Stimuli Influence the Formation of the Endogenous Components of the Event-Related Auditory Evoked Potentials?
title_short Does the Number of Stimuli Influence the Formation of the Endogenous Components of the Event-Related Auditory Evoked Potentials?
title_sort does the number of stimuli influence the formation of the endogenous components of the event-related auditory evoked potentials?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759605
work_keys_str_mv AT oliveirayorranmarquesde doesthenumberofstimuliinfluencetheformationoftheendogenouscomponentsoftheeventrelatedauditoryevokedpotentials
AT calderarovictorgoiris doesthenumberofstimuliinfluencetheformationoftheendogenouscomponentsoftheeventrelatedauditoryevokedpotentials
AT massudaeduardotanaka doesthenumberofstimuliinfluencetheformationoftheendogenouscomponentsoftheeventrelatedauditoryevokedpotentials
AT zanchettasthella doesthenumberofstimuliinfluencetheformationoftheendogenouscomponentsoftheeventrelatedauditoryevokedpotentials
AT simoeshumbertodeoliveira doesthenumberofstimuliinfluencetheformationoftheendogenouscomponentsoftheeventrelatedauditoryevokedpotentials