Cargando…
Trends and disparities in deep brain stimulation utilization in the United States: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 1993 to 2017
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved treatment option for Parkinson’s Disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, obsessive-compulsive disorder and epilepsy in the United States. There are disparities in access to DBS, and clear understanding of the contextual factors driving t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2023.100599 |
_version_ | 1785124470728425472 |
---|---|
author | Sarica, Can Conner, Christopher R. Yamamoto, Kazuaki Yang, Andrew Germann, Jürgen Lannon, Melissa M. Samuel, Nardin Colditz, Michael Santyr, Brendan Chow, Clement T. Iorio-Morin, Christian Aguirre-Padilla, David H. Lang, Stefan Thomas Vetkas, Artur Cheyuo, Cletus Loh, Aaron Darmani, Ghazaleh Flouty, Oliver Milano, Vanessa Paff, Michelle Hodaie, Mojgan Kalia, Suneil K. Munhoz, Renato P. Fasano, Alfonso Lozano, Andres M. |
author_facet | Sarica, Can Conner, Christopher R. Yamamoto, Kazuaki Yang, Andrew Germann, Jürgen Lannon, Melissa M. Samuel, Nardin Colditz, Michael Santyr, Brendan Chow, Clement T. Iorio-Morin, Christian Aguirre-Padilla, David H. Lang, Stefan Thomas Vetkas, Artur Cheyuo, Cletus Loh, Aaron Darmani, Ghazaleh Flouty, Oliver Milano, Vanessa Paff, Michelle Hodaie, Mojgan Kalia, Suneil K. Munhoz, Renato P. Fasano, Alfonso Lozano, Andres M. |
author_sort | Sarica, Can |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved treatment option for Parkinson’s Disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, obsessive-compulsive disorder and epilepsy in the United States. There are disparities in access to DBS, and clear understanding of the contextual factors driving them is important. Previous studies aimed at understanding these factors have been limited by single indications or small cohort sizes. The aim of this study is to provide an updated and comprehensive analysis of DBS utilization for multiple indications to better understand the factors driving disparities in access. METHODS: The United States based National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to analyze the surgical volume and trends of procedures based on indication, using relevant ICD codes. Predictors of DBS use were analyzed using a logistic regression model. DBS-implanted patients in each indication were compared based on the patient-, hospital-, and outcome-related variables. FINDINGS: Our analysis of 104,356 DBS discharges from 1993 to 2017 revealed that the most frequent indications for DBS were PD (67%), ET (24%), and dystonia (4%). Although the number of DBS procedures has consistently increased over the years, radiofrequency ablation utilization has significantly decreased to only a few patients per year since 2003. Negative predictors for DBS utilization in PD and ET cohorts included age increase and female sex, while African American status was a negative predictor across all cohorts. Significant differences in patient-, hospital-, and outcome-related variables between DBS indications were also determined. INTERPRETATION: Demographic and socioeconomic-based disparities in DBS use are evident. Although racial disparities are present across all indications, other disparities such as age, sex, wealth, and insurance status are only relevant in certain indications. FUNDING: This work was supported by Alan & Susan Hudson Cornerstone Chair in Neurosurgery at 10.13039/100009663University Health Network. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10593574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105935742023-10-24 Trends and disparities in deep brain stimulation utilization in the United States: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 1993 to 2017 Sarica, Can Conner, Christopher R. Yamamoto, Kazuaki Yang, Andrew Germann, Jürgen Lannon, Melissa M. Samuel, Nardin Colditz, Michael Santyr, Brendan Chow, Clement T. Iorio-Morin, Christian Aguirre-Padilla, David H. Lang, Stefan Thomas Vetkas, Artur Cheyuo, Cletus Loh, Aaron Darmani, Ghazaleh Flouty, Oliver Milano, Vanessa Paff, Michelle Hodaie, Mojgan Kalia, Suneil K. Munhoz, Renato P. Fasano, Alfonso Lozano, Andres M. Lancet Reg Health Am Articles BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved treatment option for Parkinson’s Disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, obsessive-compulsive disorder and epilepsy in the United States. There are disparities in access to DBS, and clear understanding of the contextual factors driving them is important. Previous studies aimed at understanding these factors have been limited by single indications or small cohort sizes. The aim of this study is to provide an updated and comprehensive analysis of DBS utilization for multiple indications to better understand the factors driving disparities in access. METHODS: The United States based National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to analyze the surgical volume and trends of procedures based on indication, using relevant ICD codes. Predictors of DBS use were analyzed using a logistic regression model. DBS-implanted patients in each indication were compared based on the patient-, hospital-, and outcome-related variables. FINDINGS: Our analysis of 104,356 DBS discharges from 1993 to 2017 revealed that the most frequent indications for DBS were PD (67%), ET (24%), and dystonia (4%). Although the number of DBS procedures has consistently increased over the years, radiofrequency ablation utilization has significantly decreased to only a few patients per year since 2003. Negative predictors for DBS utilization in PD and ET cohorts included age increase and female sex, while African American status was a negative predictor across all cohorts. Significant differences in patient-, hospital-, and outcome-related variables between DBS indications were also determined. INTERPRETATION: Demographic and socioeconomic-based disparities in DBS use are evident. Although racial disparities are present across all indications, other disparities such as age, sex, wealth, and insurance status are only relevant in certain indications. FUNDING: This work was supported by Alan & Susan Hudson Cornerstone Chair in Neurosurgery at 10.13039/100009663University Health Network. Elsevier 2023-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10593574/ /pubmed/37876670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2023.100599 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Articles Sarica, Can Conner, Christopher R. Yamamoto, Kazuaki Yang, Andrew Germann, Jürgen Lannon, Melissa M. Samuel, Nardin Colditz, Michael Santyr, Brendan Chow, Clement T. Iorio-Morin, Christian Aguirre-Padilla, David H. Lang, Stefan Thomas Vetkas, Artur Cheyuo, Cletus Loh, Aaron Darmani, Ghazaleh Flouty, Oliver Milano, Vanessa Paff, Michelle Hodaie, Mojgan Kalia, Suneil K. Munhoz, Renato P. Fasano, Alfonso Lozano, Andres M. Trends and disparities in deep brain stimulation utilization in the United States: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 1993 to 2017 |
title | Trends and disparities in deep brain stimulation utilization in the United States: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 1993 to 2017 |
title_full | Trends and disparities in deep brain stimulation utilization in the United States: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 1993 to 2017 |
title_fullStr | Trends and disparities in deep brain stimulation utilization in the United States: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 1993 to 2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends and disparities in deep brain stimulation utilization in the United States: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 1993 to 2017 |
title_short | Trends and disparities in deep brain stimulation utilization in the United States: a Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis from 1993 to 2017 |
title_sort | trends and disparities in deep brain stimulation utilization in the united states: a nationwide inpatient sample analysis from 1993 to 2017 |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2023.100599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saricacan trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT connerchristopherr trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT yamamotokazuaki trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT yangandrew trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT germannjurgen trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT lannonmelissam trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT samuelnardin trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT colditzmichael trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT santyrbrendan trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT chowclementt trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT ioriomorinchristian trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT aguirrepadilladavidh trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT langstefanthomas trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT vetkasartur trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT cheyuocletus trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT lohaaron trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT darmanighazaleh trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT floutyoliver trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT milanovanessa trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT paffmichelle trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT hodaiemojgan trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT kaliasuneilk trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT munhozrenatop trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT fasanoalfonso trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 AT lozanoandresm trendsanddisparitiesindeepbrainstimulationutilizationintheunitedstatesanationwideinpatientsampleanalysisfrom1993to2017 |