Cargando…

Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization

BACKGROUND: Electronic health record (EHR) implementations, whether replacing paper or electronic systems, are major social and organizational transformations. Yet studies of EHR-to-EHR transitions have largely neglected to elucidate accompanying social and organizational changes. One such underexpl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brunner, Julian, Cannedy, Shay, McCoy, Matthew, Hamilton, Alison B., Shelton, Jeremy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08280-7
_version_ 1785124487141785600
author Brunner, Julian
Cannedy, Shay
McCoy, Matthew
Hamilton, Alison B.
Shelton, Jeremy
author_facet Brunner, Julian
Cannedy, Shay
McCoy, Matthew
Hamilton, Alison B.
Shelton, Jeremy
author_sort Brunner, Julian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electronic health record (EHR) implementations, whether replacing paper or electronic systems, are major social and organizational transformations. Yet studies of EHR-to-EHR transitions have largely neglected to elucidate accompanying social and organizational changes. One such underexplored change is the standardization of clinical practice in the context of EHR transitions. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has begun a decade-long process of replacing the approximately 130 separate versions of its homegrown EHR with a single commercial EHR system. This provides an opportunity to explore the standardization of clinical practice amidst an EHR transition. OBJECTIVE: To identify, in the context of a large-scale EHR transition, (1) the scope and content of clinical standardization and (2) the anticipated implications of such standardization. DESIGN: Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine members of VA councils established for the EHR transition. APPROACH: We conducted semi-structured interviews, which were professionally transcribed, and analyzed first using rapid analysis methods, followed by coding and content analysis. KEY RESULTS: Clinical standardization across facilities was a central goal of the EHR transition, encompassing computerized recommendations, order sets, professional roles/permissions, and clinical documentation. The anticipated implications of this standardization include (i) potential efficiency gains, with less duplicated effort across facilities; (ii) expanded bureaucracy; and (iii) increased uniformity, reducing both wanted and unwanted variation in care. CONCLUSIONS: EHR systems shape a wide range of clinical processes, particularly in a large organization like VA with a long history of EHR use. This makes standardization of EHR content a powerful mechanism for standardizing clinical practice itself, which can bring dramatic collateral consequences. Organizations undergoing EHR transitions need to recognize the important role that clinical standardization plays by treating EHR transitions as major organizational transformations in the governance of clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08280-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10593671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105936712023-10-25 Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization Brunner, Julian Cannedy, Shay McCoy, Matthew Hamilton, Alison B. Shelton, Jeremy J Gen Intern Med Original Research: Qualitative Research BACKGROUND: Electronic health record (EHR) implementations, whether replacing paper or electronic systems, are major social and organizational transformations. Yet studies of EHR-to-EHR transitions have largely neglected to elucidate accompanying social and organizational changes. One such underexplored change is the standardization of clinical practice in the context of EHR transitions. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has begun a decade-long process of replacing the approximately 130 separate versions of its homegrown EHR with a single commercial EHR system. This provides an opportunity to explore the standardization of clinical practice amidst an EHR transition. OBJECTIVE: To identify, in the context of a large-scale EHR transition, (1) the scope and content of clinical standardization and (2) the anticipated implications of such standardization. DESIGN: Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine members of VA councils established for the EHR transition. APPROACH: We conducted semi-structured interviews, which were professionally transcribed, and analyzed first using rapid analysis methods, followed by coding and content analysis. KEY RESULTS: Clinical standardization across facilities was a central goal of the EHR transition, encompassing computerized recommendations, order sets, professional roles/permissions, and clinical documentation. The anticipated implications of this standardization include (i) potential efficiency gains, with less duplicated effort across facilities; (ii) expanded bureaucracy; and (iii) increased uniformity, reducing both wanted and unwanted variation in care. CONCLUSIONS: EHR systems shape a wide range of clinical processes, particularly in a large organization like VA with a long history of EHR use. This makes standardization of EHR content a powerful mechanism for standardizing clinical practice itself, which can bring dramatic collateral consequences. Organizations undergoing EHR transitions need to recognize the important role that clinical standardization plays by treating EHR transitions as major organizational transformations in the governance of clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08280-7. Springer International Publishing 2023-10-05 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10593671/ /pubmed/37798574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08280-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research: Qualitative Research
Brunner, Julian
Cannedy, Shay
McCoy, Matthew
Hamilton, Alison B.
Shelton, Jeremy
Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization
title Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization
title_full Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization
title_fullStr Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization
title_full_unstemmed Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization
title_short Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization
title_sort software is policy: electronic health record governance and the implications of clinical standardization
topic Original Research: Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08280-7
work_keys_str_mv AT brunnerjulian softwareispolicyelectronichealthrecordgovernanceandtheimplicationsofclinicalstandardization
AT cannedyshay softwareispolicyelectronichealthrecordgovernanceandtheimplicationsofclinicalstandardization
AT mccoymatthew softwareispolicyelectronichealthrecordgovernanceandtheimplicationsofclinicalstandardization
AT hamiltonalisonb softwareispolicyelectronichealthrecordgovernanceandtheimplicationsofclinicalstandardization
AT sheltonjeremy softwareispolicyelectronichealthrecordgovernanceandtheimplicationsofclinicalstandardization