Cargando…
Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization
BACKGROUND: Electronic health record (EHR) implementations, whether replacing paper or electronic systems, are major social and organizational transformations. Yet studies of EHR-to-EHR transitions have largely neglected to elucidate accompanying social and organizational changes. One such underexpl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08280-7 |
_version_ | 1785124487141785600 |
---|---|
author | Brunner, Julian Cannedy, Shay McCoy, Matthew Hamilton, Alison B. Shelton, Jeremy |
author_facet | Brunner, Julian Cannedy, Shay McCoy, Matthew Hamilton, Alison B. Shelton, Jeremy |
author_sort | Brunner, Julian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electronic health record (EHR) implementations, whether replacing paper or electronic systems, are major social and organizational transformations. Yet studies of EHR-to-EHR transitions have largely neglected to elucidate accompanying social and organizational changes. One such underexplored change is the standardization of clinical practice in the context of EHR transitions. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has begun a decade-long process of replacing the approximately 130 separate versions of its homegrown EHR with a single commercial EHR system. This provides an opportunity to explore the standardization of clinical practice amidst an EHR transition. OBJECTIVE: To identify, in the context of a large-scale EHR transition, (1) the scope and content of clinical standardization and (2) the anticipated implications of such standardization. DESIGN: Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine members of VA councils established for the EHR transition. APPROACH: We conducted semi-structured interviews, which were professionally transcribed, and analyzed first using rapid analysis methods, followed by coding and content analysis. KEY RESULTS: Clinical standardization across facilities was a central goal of the EHR transition, encompassing computerized recommendations, order sets, professional roles/permissions, and clinical documentation. The anticipated implications of this standardization include (i) potential efficiency gains, with less duplicated effort across facilities; (ii) expanded bureaucracy; and (iii) increased uniformity, reducing both wanted and unwanted variation in care. CONCLUSIONS: EHR systems shape a wide range of clinical processes, particularly in a large organization like VA with a long history of EHR use. This makes standardization of EHR content a powerful mechanism for standardizing clinical practice itself, which can bring dramatic collateral consequences. Organizations undergoing EHR transitions need to recognize the important role that clinical standardization plays by treating EHR transitions as major organizational transformations in the governance of clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08280-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10593671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105936712023-10-25 Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization Brunner, Julian Cannedy, Shay McCoy, Matthew Hamilton, Alison B. Shelton, Jeremy J Gen Intern Med Original Research: Qualitative Research BACKGROUND: Electronic health record (EHR) implementations, whether replacing paper or electronic systems, are major social and organizational transformations. Yet studies of EHR-to-EHR transitions have largely neglected to elucidate accompanying social and organizational changes. One such underexplored change is the standardization of clinical practice in the context of EHR transitions. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has begun a decade-long process of replacing the approximately 130 separate versions of its homegrown EHR with a single commercial EHR system. This provides an opportunity to explore the standardization of clinical practice amidst an EHR transition. OBJECTIVE: To identify, in the context of a large-scale EHR transition, (1) the scope and content of clinical standardization and (2) the anticipated implications of such standardization. DESIGN: Qualitative study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-nine members of VA councils established for the EHR transition. APPROACH: We conducted semi-structured interviews, which were professionally transcribed, and analyzed first using rapid analysis methods, followed by coding and content analysis. KEY RESULTS: Clinical standardization across facilities was a central goal of the EHR transition, encompassing computerized recommendations, order sets, professional roles/permissions, and clinical documentation. The anticipated implications of this standardization include (i) potential efficiency gains, with less duplicated effort across facilities; (ii) expanded bureaucracy; and (iii) increased uniformity, reducing both wanted and unwanted variation in care. CONCLUSIONS: EHR systems shape a wide range of clinical processes, particularly in a large organization like VA with a long history of EHR use. This makes standardization of EHR content a powerful mechanism for standardizing clinical practice itself, which can bring dramatic collateral consequences. Organizations undergoing EHR transitions need to recognize the important role that clinical standardization plays by treating EHR transitions as major organizational transformations in the governance of clinical practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08280-7. Springer International Publishing 2023-10-05 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10593671/ /pubmed/37798574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08280-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research: Qualitative Research Brunner, Julian Cannedy, Shay McCoy, Matthew Hamilton, Alison B. Shelton, Jeremy Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization |
title | Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization |
title_full | Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization |
title_fullStr | Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization |
title_full_unstemmed | Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization |
title_short | Software is Policy: Electronic Health Record Governance and the Implications of Clinical Standardization |
title_sort | software is policy: electronic health record governance and the implications of clinical standardization |
topic | Original Research: Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08280-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunnerjulian softwareispolicyelectronichealthrecordgovernanceandtheimplicationsofclinicalstandardization AT cannedyshay softwareispolicyelectronichealthrecordgovernanceandtheimplicationsofclinicalstandardization AT mccoymatthew softwareispolicyelectronichealthrecordgovernanceandtheimplicationsofclinicalstandardization AT hamiltonalisonb softwareispolicyelectronichealthrecordgovernanceandtheimplicationsofclinicalstandardization AT sheltonjeremy softwareispolicyelectronichealthrecordgovernanceandtheimplicationsofclinicalstandardization |