Cargando…

Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Primary care practitioners (PCPs) play a key role in cancer screening decisions for older adults (≥ 65 years), but recommendations vary by cancer type and jurisdiction. PURPOSE: To examine the factors influencing PCPs’ recommendations for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Jenna, Dodd, Rachael H., Gainey, Karen M., Naganathan, Vasi, Cvejic, Erin, Jansen, Jesse, McCaffery, Kirsten J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4
_version_ 1785124489043902464
author Smith, Jenna
Dodd, Rachael H.
Gainey, Karen M.
Naganathan, Vasi
Cvejic, Erin
Jansen, Jesse
McCaffery, Kirsten J.
author_facet Smith, Jenna
Dodd, Rachael H.
Gainey, Karen M.
Naganathan, Vasi
Cvejic, Erin
Jansen, Jesse
McCaffery, Kirsten J.
author_sort Smith, Jenna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary care practitioners (PCPs) play a key role in cancer screening decisions for older adults (≥ 65 years), but recommendations vary by cancer type and jurisdiction. PURPOSE: To examine the factors influencing PCPs’ recommendations for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer screening for older adults. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Pre-Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, searched from 1 January 2000 to July 2021, and citation searching in July 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Assessed factors influencing PCPs’ breast, prostate, colorectal, or cervical cancer screening decisions for older adults’ (defined either as ≥ 65 years or < 10-year life expectancy). DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently conducted data extraction and quality appraisal. Decisions were crosschecked and discussed where necessary. DATA SYNTHESIS: From 1926 records, 30 studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty were quantitative, nine were qualitative, and one used a mixed method design. Twenty-nine were conducted in the USA, and one in the UK. Factors were synthesized into six categories: patient demographic characteristics, patient health characteristics, patient and clinician psycho-social factors, clinician characteristics, and health system factors. Patient preference was most reported as influential across both quantitative and qualitative studies. Age, health status, and life expectancy were also commonly influential, but PCPs held nuanced views about life expectancy. Weighing benefits/harms was also commonly reported with variation across cancer screening types. Other factors included patient screening history, clinician attitudes/personal experiences, patient/provider relationship, guidelines, reminders, and time. LIMITATIONS: We could not conduct a meta-analysis due to variability in study designs and measurement. The vast majority of included studies were conducted in the USA. CONCLUSIONS: Although PCPs play a role in individualizing cancer screening for older adults, multi-level interventions are needed to improve these decisions. Decision support should continue to be developed and implemented to support informed choice for older adults and assist PCPs to consistently provide evidence-based recommendations. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021268219. FUNDING SOURCE: NHMRC APP1113532. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10593684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105936842023-10-25 Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review Smith, Jenna Dodd, Rachael H. Gainey, Karen M. Naganathan, Vasi Cvejic, Erin Jansen, Jesse McCaffery, Kirsten J. J Gen Intern Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Primary care practitioners (PCPs) play a key role in cancer screening decisions for older adults (≥ 65 years), but recommendations vary by cancer type and jurisdiction. PURPOSE: To examine the factors influencing PCPs’ recommendations for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer screening for older adults. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Pre-Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, searched from 1 January 2000 to July 2021, and citation searching in July 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Assessed factors influencing PCPs’ breast, prostate, colorectal, or cervical cancer screening decisions for older adults’ (defined either as ≥ 65 years or < 10-year life expectancy). DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently conducted data extraction and quality appraisal. Decisions were crosschecked and discussed where necessary. DATA SYNTHESIS: From 1926 records, 30 studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty were quantitative, nine were qualitative, and one used a mixed method design. Twenty-nine were conducted in the USA, and one in the UK. Factors were synthesized into six categories: patient demographic characteristics, patient health characteristics, patient and clinician psycho-social factors, clinician characteristics, and health system factors. Patient preference was most reported as influential across both quantitative and qualitative studies. Age, health status, and life expectancy were also commonly influential, but PCPs held nuanced views about life expectancy. Weighing benefits/harms was also commonly reported with variation across cancer screening types. Other factors included patient screening history, clinician attitudes/personal experiences, patient/provider relationship, guidelines, reminders, and time. LIMITATIONS: We could not conduct a meta-analysis due to variability in study designs and measurement. The vast majority of included studies were conducted in the USA. CONCLUSIONS: Although PCPs play a role in individualizing cancer screening for older adults, multi-level interventions are needed to improve these decisions. Decision support should continue to be developed and implemented to support informed choice for older adults and assist PCPs to consistently provide evidence-based recommendations. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021268219. FUNDING SOURCE: NHMRC APP1113532. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-04 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10593684/ /pubmed/37142822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Smith, Jenna
Dodd, Rachael H.
Gainey, Karen M.
Naganathan, Vasi
Cvejic, Erin
Jansen, Jesse
McCaffery, Kirsten J.
Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review
title Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review
title_full Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review
title_short Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review
title_sort factors influencing primary care practitioners’ cancer screening recommendations for older adults: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4
work_keys_str_mv AT smithjenna factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview
AT doddrachaelh factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview
AT gaineykarenm factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview
AT naganathanvasi factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview
AT cvejicerin factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview
AT jansenjesse factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview
AT mccafferykirstenj factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview