Cargando…
Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Primary care practitioners (PCPs) play a key role in cancer screening decisions for older adults (≥ 65 years), but recommendations vary by cancer type and jurisdiction. PURPOSE: To examine the factors influencing PCPs’ recommendations for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4 |
_version_ | 1785124489043902464 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Jenna Dodd, Rachael H. Gainey, Karen M. Naganathan, Vasi Cvejic, Erin Jansen, Jesse McCaffery, Kirsten J. |
author_facet | Smith, Jenna Dodd, Rachael H. Gainey, Karen M. Naganathan, Vasi Cvejic, Erin Jansen, Jesse McCaffery, Kirsten J. |
author_sort | Smith, Jenna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Primary care practitioners (PCPs) play a key role in cancer screening decisions for older adults (≥ 65 years), but recommendations vary by cancer type and jurisdiction. PURPOSE: To examine the factors influencing PCPs’ recommendations for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer screening for older adults. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Pre-Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, searched from 1 January 2000 to July 2021, and citation searching in July 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Assessed factors influencing PCPs’ breast, prostate, colorectal, or cervical cancer screening decisions for older adults’ (defined either as ≥ 65 years or < 10-year life expectancy). DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently conducted data extraction and quality appraisal. Decisions were crosschecked and discussed where necessary. DATA SYNTHESIS: From 1926 records, 30 studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty were quantitative, nine were qualitative, and one used a mixed method design. Twenty-nine were conducted in the USA, and one in the UK. Factors were synthesized into six categories: patient demographic characteristics, patient health characteristics, patient and clinician psycho-social factors, clinician characteristics, and health system factors. Patient preference was most reported as influential across both quantitative and qualitative studies. Age, health status, and life expectancy were also commonly influential, but PCPs held nuanced views about life expectancy. Weighing benefits/harms was also commonly reported with variation across cancer screening types. Other factors included patient screening history, clinician attitudes/personal experiences, patient/provider relationship, guidelines, reminders, and time. LIMITATIONS: We could not conduct a meta-analysis due to variability in study designs and measurement. The vast majority of included studies were conducted in the USA. CONCLUSIONS: Although PCPs play a role in individualizing cancer screening for older adults, multi-level interventions are needed to improve these decisions. Decision support should continue to be developed and implemented to support informed choice for older adults and assist PCPs to consistently provide evidence-based recommendations. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021268219. FUNDING SOURCE: NHMRC APP1113532. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10593684 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105936842023-10-25 Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review Smith, Jenna Dodd, Rachael H. Gainey, Karen M. Naganathan, Vasi Cvejic, Erin Jansen, Jesse McCaffery, Kirsten J. J Gen Intern Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Primary care practitioners (PCPs) play a key role in cancer screening decisions for older adults (≥ 65 years), but recommendations vary by cancer type and jurisdiction. PURPOSE: To examine the factors influencing PCPs’ recommendations for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer screening for older adults. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Pre-Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, searched from 1 January 2000 to July 2021, and citation searching in July 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Assessed factors influencing PCPs’ breast, prostate, colorectal, or cervical cancer screening decisions for older adults’ (defined either as ≥ 65 years or < 10-year life expectancy). DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently conducted data extraction and quality appraisal. Decisions were crosschecked and discussed where necessary. DATA SYNTHESIS: From 1926 records, 30 studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty were quantitative, nine were qualitative, and one used a mixed method design. Twenty-nine were conducted in the USA, and one in the UK. Factors were synthesized into six categories: patient demographic characteristics, patient health characteristics, patient and clinician psycho-social factors, clinician characteristics, and health system factors. Patient preference was most reported as influential across both quantitative and qualitative studies. Age, health status, and life expectancy were also commonly influential, but PCPs held nuanced views about life expectancy. Weighing benefits/harms was also commonly reported with variation across cancer screening types. Other factors included patient screening history, clinician attitudes/personal experiences, patient/provider relationship, guidelines, reminders, and time. LIMITATIONS: We could not conduct a meta-analysis due to variability in study designs and measurement. The vast majority of included studies were conducted in the USA. CONCLUSIONS: Although PCPs play a role in individualizing cancer screening for older adults, multi-level interventions are needed to improve these decisions. Decision support should continue to be developed and implemented to support informed choice for older adults and assist PCPs to consistently provide evidence-based recommendations. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021268219. FUNDING SOURCE: NHMRC APP1113532. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-04 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10593684/ /pubmed/37142822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Smith, Jenna Dodd, Rachael H. Gainey, Karen M. Naganathan, Vasi Cvejic, Erin Jansen, Jesse McCaffery, Kirsten J. Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review |
title | Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review |
title_full | Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review |
title_short | Factors Influencing Primary Care Practitioners’ Cancer Screening Recommendations for Older Adults: a Systematic Review |
title_sort | factors influencing primary care practitioners’ cancer screening recommendations for older adults: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37142822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08213-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithjenna factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview AT doddrachaelh factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview AT gaineykarenm factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview AT naganathanvasi factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview AT cvejicerin factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview AT jansenjesse factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview AT mccafferykirstenj factorsinfluencingprimarycarepractitionerscancerscreeningrecommendationsforolderadultsasystematicreview |