Cargando…
Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Transitioning to a new electronic health record (EHR) presents different challenges than transitions from paper to electronic records. We synthesized the body of peer-reviewed literature on EHR-to-EHR transitions to evaluate the generalizability of published work and identify knowledge g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08276-3 |
_version_ | 1785124491942166528 |
---|---|
author | Miake-Lye, Isomi M Cogan, Alison M. Mak, Selene Brunner, Julian Rinne, Seppo Brayton, Catherine E. Krones, Ariella Ross, Travis E. Burton, Jason T. Weiner, Michael |
author_facet | Miake-Lye, Isomi M Cogan, Alison M. Mak, Selene Brunner, Julian Rinne, Seppo Brayton, Catherine E. Krones, Ariella Ross, Travis E. Burton, Jason T. Weiner, Michael |
author_sort | Miake-Lye, Isomi M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transitioning to a new electronic health record (EHR) presents different challenges than transitions from paper to electronic records. We synthesized the body of peer-reviewed literature on EHR-to-EHR transitions to evaluate the generalizability of published work and identify knowledge gaps where more evidence is needed. METHODS: We conducted a broad search in PubMed through July 2022 and collected all publications from two prior reviews. Peer-reviewed publications reporting on data from an EHR-to-EHR transition were included. We extracted data on study design, setting, sample size, EHR systems involved, dates of transition and data collection, outcomes reported, and key findings. RESULTS: The 40 included publications were grouped into thematic categories for narrative synthesis: clinical care outcomes (n = 15), provider perspectives (n = 11), data migration (n = 8), patient experience (n = 4), and other topics (n = 5). Many studies described single sites that are early adopters of technology with robust research resources, switching from a homegrown system to a commercial system, and emphasized the dynamic effect of transitioning on important clinical care and other outcomes over time. DISCUSSION: The published literature represents a heterogeneous mix of study designs and outcome measures, and while some of the stronger studies in this review used longitudinal approaches to compare outcomes across more sites, the current literature is primarily descriptive and is not designed to offer recommendations that can guide future EHR transitions. Transitioning from one EHR to another constitutes a major organizational change that requires nearly every person in the organization to change how they do their work. Future research should include human factors as well as diverse methodological approaches such as mixed methods and implementation science. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08276-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10593710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105937102023-10-25 Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review Miake-Lye, Isomi M Cogan, Alison M. Mak, Selene Brunner, Julian Rinne, Seppo Brayton, Catherine E. Krones, Ariella Ross, Travis E. Burton, Jason T. Weiner, Michael J Gen Intern Med Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Transitioning to a new electronic health record (EHR) presents different challenges than transitions from paper to electronic records. We synthesized the body of peer-reviewed literature on EHR-to-EHR transitions to evaluate the generalizability of published work and identify knowledge gaps where more evidence is needed. METHODS: We conducted a broad search in PubMed through July 2022 and collected all publications from two prior reviews. Peer-reviewed publications reporting on data from an EHR-to-EHR transition were included. We extracted data on study design, setting, sample size, EHR systems involved, dates of transition and data collection, outcomes reported, and key findings. RESULTS: The 40 included publications were grouped into thematic categories for narrative synthesis: clinical care outcomes (n = 15), provider perspectives (n = 11), data migration (n = 8), patient experience (n = 4), and other topics (n = 5). Many studies described single sites that are early adopters of technology with robust research resources, switching from a homegrown system to a commercial system, and emphasized the dynamic effect of transitioning on important clinical care and other outcomes over time. DISCUSSION: The published literature represents a heterogeneous mix of study designs and outcome measures, and while some of the stronger studies in this review used longitudinal approaches to compare outcomes across more sites, the current literature is primarily descriptive and is not designed to offer recommendations that can guide future EHR transitions. Transitioning from one EHR to another constitutes a major organizational change that requires nearly every person in the organization to change how they do their work. Future research should include human factors as well as diverse methodological approaches such as mixed methods and implementation science. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-023-08276-3. Springer International Publishing 2023-10-05 2023-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10593710/ /pubmed/37798580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08276-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Miake-Lye, Isomi M Cogan, Alison M. Mak, Selene Brunner, Julian Rinne, Seppo Brayton, Catherine E. Krones, Ariella Ross, Travis E. Burton, Jason T. Weiner, Michael Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review |
title | Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | transitioning from one electronic health record to another: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37798580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08276-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miakelyeisomim transitioningfromoneelectronichealthrecordtoanotherasystematicreview AT coganalisonm transitioningfromoneelectronichealthrecordtoanotherasystematicreview AT makselene transitioningfromoneelectronichealthrecordtoanotherasystematicreview AT brunnerjulian transitioningfromoneelectronichealthrecordtoanotherasystematicreview AT rinneseppo transitioningfromoneelectronichealthrecordtoanotherasystematicreview AT braytoncatherinee transitioningfromoneelectronichealthrecordtoanotherasystematicreview AT kronesariella transitioningfromoneelectronichealthrecordtoanotherasystematicreview AT rosstravise transitioningfromoneelectronichealthrecordtoanotherasystematicreview AT burtonjasont transitioningfromoneelectronichealthrecordtoanotherasystematicreview AT weinermichael transitioningfromoneelectronichealthrecordtoanotherasystematicreview |