Cargando…

Cardiovascular metrics on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension — re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension

PURPOSE: To re-assess cardiovascular metrics on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in predicting pulmonary hypertension (PH) under the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study retrospectively included 272 patients (female 143, mean age = 54.9 ± 12.5 year...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Anqi, Xu, Wenqing, Xi, Linfeng, Deng, Mei, Yang, Haoyu, Huang, Qiang, Gao, Qian, Zhang, Peiyao, Xie, Wanmu, Huang, Zhenguo, Liu, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37872384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01535-1
_version_ 1785124493355646976
author Liu, Anqi
Xu, Wenqing
Xi, Linfeng
Deng, Mei
Yang, Haoyu
Huang, Qiang
Gao, Qian
Zhang, Peiyao
Xie, Wanmu
Huang, Zhenguo
Liu, Min
author_facet Liu, Anqi
Xu, Wenqing
Xi, Linfeng
Deng, Mei
Yang, Haoyu
Huang, Qiang
Gao, Qian
Zhang, Peiyao
Xie, Wanmu
Huang, Zhenguo
Liu, Min
author_sort Liu, Anqi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To re-assess cardiovascular metrics on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in predicting pulmonary hypertension (PH) under the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study retrospectively included 272 patients (female 143, mean age = 54.9 ± 12.5 years old) with suspected PH. 218 patients were grouped to evaluate cardiovascular metrics on CTPA and develop a binary logistic regression model. The other 54 patients were grouped into the validation group to assess the performance of the prediction model under the updated criteria. Based on mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), patients were divided into three groups: group A consisted of patients with mPAP ≤ 20 mmHg, group B included patients with 20 mmHg < mPAP < 25 mmHg, and group C comprised patients with mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg. Cardiovascular metrics among the three groups were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were used to evaluate the performance of cardiovascular metrics in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg. RESULTS: The main pulmonary arterial diameter (MPAd), MPAd/ascending aorta diameter ratio (MPAd/AAd ratio), and right ventricular free wall thickness (RVFWT) showed significant differences among the three groups (p < 0.05). The area under curve (AUC) of MPAd was larger than MPAd/AAd ratio and RVFWT. A MPAd cutoff value of 30.0 mm has a sensitivity of 83.1% and a specificity of 90.4%. The AUC of the binary logistic regression model (Z =  − 12.98187 + 0.31053 MPAd + 1.04863 RVFWT) was 0.938 ± 0.018. In the validation group, the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the prediction model were 0.878, 92.7%, 76.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Under the updated criteria, MPAd with a threshold value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting PH. The binary logistic regression model may improve the diagnostic accuracy. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Under the updated criteria, the main pulmonary arterial diameter with a threshold value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting pulmonary hypertension. The binary logistic regression model may improve diagnostic accuracy. KEY POINTS: • According to 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines, a MPAd cutoff value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg • A binary logistic regression model (Z = − 12.98187 + 0.31053 MPAd + 1.04863 RVFWT) was developed and had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.7%, 76.9%, and 88.9% in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg. • A binary logistic regression prediction model outperforms MPAd in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01535-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10593727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105937272023-10-25 Cardiovascular metrics on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension — re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension Liu, Anqi Xu, Wenqing Xi, Linfeng Deng, Mei Yang, Haoyu Huang, Qiang Gao, Qian Zhang, Peiyao Xie, Wanmu Huang, Zhenguo Liu, Min Insights Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: To re-assess cardiovascular metrics on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in predicting pulmonary hypertension (PH) under the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational study retrospectively included 272 patients (female 143, mean age = 54.9 ± 12.5 years old) with suspected PH. 218 patients were grouped to evaluate cardiovascular metrics on CTPA and develop a binary logistic regression model. The other 54 patients were grouped into the validation group to assess the performance of the prediction model under the updated criteria. Based on mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), patients were divided into three groups: group A consisted of patients with mPAP ≤ 20 mmHg, group B included patients with 20 mmHg < mPAP < 25 mmHg, and group C comprised patients with mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg. Cardiovascular metrics among the three groups were compared, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) were used to evaluate the performance of cardiovascular metrics in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg. RESULTS: The main pulmonary arterial diameter (MPAd), MPAd/ascending aorta diameter ratio (MPAd/AAd ratio), and right ventricular free wall thickness (RVFWT) showed significant differences among the three groups (p < 0.05). The area under curve (AUC) of MPAd was larger than MPAd/AAd ratio and RVFWT. A MPAd cutoff value of 30.0 mm has a sensitivity of 83.1% and a specificity of 90.4%. The AUC of the binary logistic regression model (Z =  − 12.98187 + 0.31053 MPAd + 1.04863 RVFWT) was 0.938 ± 0.018. In the validation group, the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the prediction model were 0.878, 92.7%, 76.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Under the updated criteria, MPAd with a threshold value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting PH. The binary logistic regression model may improve the diagnostic accuracy. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Under the updated criteria, the main pulmonary arterial diameter with a threshold value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting pulmonary hypertension. The binary logistic regression model may improve diagnostic accuracy. KEY POINTS: • According to 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines, a MPAd cutoff value of 30.0 mm has better sensitivity and specificity in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg • A binary logistic regression model (Z = − 12.98187 + 0.31053 MPAd + 1.04863 RVFWT) was developed and had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.7%, 76.9%, and 88.9% in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg. • A binary logistic regression prediction model outperforms MPAd in predicting mPAP > 20 mmHg. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-023-01535-1. Springer Vienna 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10593727/ /pubmed/37872384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01535-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Liu, Anqi
Xu, Wenqing
Xi, Linfeng
Deng, Mei
Yang, Haoyu
Huang, Qiang
Gao, Qian
Zhang, Peiyao
Xie, Wanmu
Huang, Zhenguo
Liu, Min
Cardiovascular metrics on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension — re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension
title Cardiovascular metrics on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension — re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension
title_full Cardiovascular metrics on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension — re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension
title_fullStr Cardiovascular metrics on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension — re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular metrics on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension — re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension
title_short Cardiovascular metrics on CT pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension — re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension
title_sort cardiovascular metrics on ct pulmonary angiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension — re-evaluation under the updated guidelines of pulmonary hypertension
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37872384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01535-1
work_keys_str_mv AT liuanqi cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension
AT xuwenqing cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension
AT xilinfeng cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension
AT dengmei cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension
AT yanghaoyu cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension
AT huangqiang cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension
AT gaoqian cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension
AT zhangpeiyao cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension
AT xiewanmu cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension
AT huangzhenguo cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension
AT liumin cardiovascularmetricsonctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithpulmonaryhypertensionreevaluationundertheupdatedguidelinesofpulmonaryhypertension