Cargando…

Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study

Summary of Findings (SoF) tables concisely present the main findings of evidence synthesis of health evidence, but how users navigate it to understand and interpret the presented information is not clear. We quantified the interaction of medical students with an SoF table while answering a knowledge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matas, Jakov, Tokalić, Ružica, García-Costa, Daniel, López-Iñesta, Emilia, Álvarez-García, Elena, Grimaldo, Francisco, Marušić, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37872203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45359-x
_version_ 1785124537001574400
author Matas, Jakov
Tokalić, Ružica
García-Costa, Daniel
López-Iñesta, Emilia
Álvarez-García, Elena
Grimaldo, Francisco
Marušić, Ana
author_facet Matas, Jakov
Tokalić, Ružica
García-Costa, Daniel
López-Iñesta, Emilia
Álvarez-García, Elena
Grimaldo, Francisco
Marušić, Ana
author_sort Matas, Jakov
collection PubMed
description Summary of Findings (SoF) tables concisely present the main findings of evidence synthesis of health evidence, but how users navigate it to understand and interpret the presented information is not clear. We quantified the interaction of medical students with an SoF table while answering a knowledge quiz. Read&Learn tool was used to measure the number of target and non-target table cells visited for each question and the time spent on these cells. Students positively identified target elements for quiz questions and answered simpler questions, but struggled with critical thinking and understanding study outcomes. The question on outcomes with the largest improvement post-intervention had the fewest correct answers, the longest interaction with table cells and the most opened cells before answering. Students spent a median of 72% of the time reading target table cells. A heatmap of the interactions showed that they were mostly answer-oriented. Further development of the tool and metrics is needed to use the tool and the metrics to study the cognitive processes during the assessment of health evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10593927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105939272023-10-25 Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study Matas, Jakov Tokalić, Ružica García-Costa, Daniel López-Iñesta, Emilia Álvarez-García, Elena Grimaldo, Francisco Marušić, Ana Sci Rep Article Summary of Findings (SoF) tables concisely present the main findings of evidence synthesis of health evidence, but how users navigate it to understand and interpret the presented information is not clear. We quantified the interaction of medical students with an SoF table while answering a knowledge quiz. Read&Learn tool was used to measure the number of target and non-target table cells visited for each question and the time spent on these cells. Students positively identified target elements for quiz questions and answered simpler questions, but struggled with critical thinking and understanding study outcomes. The question on outcomes with the largest improvement post-intervention had the fewest correct answers, the longest interaction with table cells and the most opened cells before answering. Students spent a median of 72% of the time reading target table cells. A heatmap of the interactions showed that they were mostly answer-oriented. Further development of the tool and metrics is needed to use the tool and the metrics to study the cognitive processes during the assessment of health evidence. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10593927/ /pubmed/37872203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45359-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Matas, Jakov
Tokalić, Ružica
García-Costa, Daniel
López-Iñesta, Emilia
Álvarez-García, Elena
Grimaldo, Francisco
Marušić, Ana
Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study
title Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study
title_full Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study
title_short Tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in Summary of Findings Table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study
title_sort tool to assess recognition and understanding of elements in summary of findings table for health evidence synthesis: a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10593927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37872203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45359-x
work_keys_str_mv AT matasjakov tooltoassessrecognitionandunderstandingofelementsinsummaryoffindingstableforhealthevidencesynthesisacrosssectionalstudy
AT tokalicruzica tooltoassessrecognitionandunderstandingofelementsinsummaryoffindingstableforhealthevidencesynthesisacrosssectionalstudy
AT garciacostadaniel tooltoassessrecognitionandunderstandingofelementsinsummaryoffindingstableforhealthevidencesynthesisacrosssectionalstudy
AT lopezinestaemilia tooltoassessrecognitionandunderstandingofelementsinsummaryoffindingstableforhealthevidencesynthesisacrosssectionalstudy
AT alvarezgarciaelena tooltoassessrecognitionandunderstandingofelementsinsummaryoffindingstableforhealthevidencesynthesisacrosssectionalstudy
AT grimaldofrancisco tooltoassessrecognitionandunderstandingofelementsinsummaryoffindingstableforhealthevidencesynthesisacrosssectionalstudy
AT marusicana tooltoassessrecognitionandunderstandingofelementsinsummaryoffindingstableforhealthevidencesynthesisacrosssectionalstudy