Toward a Precision Treatment Approach for Metabolic Depression: Integrating Epidemiology, Neuroscience, and Psychiatry

BACKGROUND: Individuals with comorbid major depressive disorder and type 2 diabetes represent an important subgroup of patients for whom conventional treatment may be insufficient. A precision treatment approach that addresses insulin resistance with an outcome of a positive response to antidepressants may prove beneficial. METHODS: This study utilized an emulated target trial on a large dataset from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart Database. We evaluated the effect of adjuvant pioglitazone, an insulin-sensitizing drug, on antidepressant response among 4696 people with type 2 diabetes, comparing it with DPP4 (dipeptidyl peptidase-4) inhibitors (non–insulin-sensitizing). An additional analysis involving 6518 participants was conducted to assess the efficacy of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas. RESULTS: The instrumental variable analysis indicated that the initiation of an antidepressant with pioglitazone was superior to DPP4 inhibitors in terms of antidepressant response, with fewer treatment shifts and/or additions of new antidepressant or antipsychotic over a 1-year period. This result was consistent when pioglitazone was compared with sulfonylureas in a supplemental analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that pioglitazone may be more effective than DPP4 inhibitors or sulfonylureas in enhancing antidepressant response among people with comorbid major depressive disorder and type 2 diabetes. This provides a strong case for the use of pioglitazone in patients with these conditions, emphasizing the potential of precision medicine strategies. The results should be interpreted with caution due to inherent limitations associated with observational data.