Cargando…
Integrated efficacy analysis from phase 3 studies of investigational microbiome therapeutic, SER-109, in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection
Background: Antibiotics alone are often insufficient to treat recurrent C. difficile infection (rCDI) because they have no activity against C. difficile spores that germinate within a disrupted microbiome. SER-109, an investigational, oral, microbiome therapeutic comprised of purified Firmicutes spo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594104/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.214 |
_version_ | 1785124574882430976 |
---|---|
author | Sims, Matthew Silverman, Michael Louie, Thomas Wang, Elaine Kraft, Colleen Ramesh, Mayur Bogdanovich, Tatiana Brady, Kelly Lombardi, David Memisoglu, Asli De, Ananya Hasson, Brooke Lee, Christine Feuerstadt, Paul Pardi, Darrell Kelly, Colleen Daley, Peter Oguchi, Godson McGovern, Barbara Moltke, Lisa Von |
author_facet | Sims, Matthew Silverman, Michael Louie, Thomas Wang, Elaine Kraft, Colleen Ramesh, Mayur Bogdanovich, Tatiana Brady, Kelly Lombardi, David Memisoglu, Asli De, Ananya Hasson, Brooke Lee, Christine Feuerstadt, Paul Pardi, Darrell Kelly, Colleen Daley, Peter Oguchi, Godson McGovern, Barbara Moltke, Lisa Von |
author_sort | Sims, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Antibiotics alone are often insufficient to treat recurrent C. difficile infection (rCDI) because they have no activity against C. difficile spores that germinate within a disrupted microbiome. SER-109, an investigational, oral, microbiome therapeutic comprised of purified Firmicutes spores, was designed to reduce rCDI through microbiome repair. We report an integrated efficacy analysis through week 24 for SER-109 from phase 3 studies, ECOSPOR III and ECOSPOR IV. Methods: ECOSPOR III was a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial conducted at 56 US or Canadian sites that included 182 participants with ≥2 CDI recurrences, confirmed via toxin EIA testing. Participants were stratified by age (<65 years or ≥65 years) and antibiotic regimen (vancomycin, fidaxomicin) and were randomized 1:1 to placebo or SER-109 groups. ECOSPOR IV was an open-label, single-arm study conducted at 72 US or Canadian sites including 263 participants with rCDI enrolled in 2 cohorts: (1) rollover participants from ECOSPOR III who experienced on-study recurrence diagnosed by toxin EIA (n = 29) and (2) participants with ≥1 CDI recurrence (diagnosed by PCR or toxin EIA), inclusive of the current episode (n = 234). In both studies, the investigational product was administered orally as 4 capsules over 3 consecutive days following symptom resolution after standard-of-care antibiotics. The primary efficacy end point was rCDI (recurrent toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) through week 8. Other end points included CDI recurrence rates and safety through 24 weeks. Results: These 349 participants received at least 1 dose of SER-109 in ECOSPOR III or ECOSPOR IV (mean age 64.2; 68.8% female). Overall, 77 participants (22.1%) enrolled with their first CDI recurrence. Four participants received blinded SER-109 in ECOSPOR III followed by a second dose of open-label SER-109 in ECOSPOR IV. Overall, the proportion of participants who received any dose of SER-109 with rCDI at week 8 was 9.5% (33 of 349; 95% CI, 6.6 %–13.0%), and the CDI recurrence rate remained low through 24 weeks (15.2%, 53 of 349; 95% CI, 11.6%–19.4%), corresponding to sustained clinical response rates of 90.5% (95% CI, 87.0%–93.4%) and 84.8% (95% CI, 80.6%–88.4%), respectively (Fig. 1). Most rollover participants (25 of 29, 86.2%) were from the placebo arm; 13.8% had rCDI by week 8. Conclusions: In this integrated analysis, the rates of rCDI were low and durable in participants who received the investigational microbiome therapeutic SER-109, with sustained clinical response rates of 90.5% and 84.8% at weeks 8 and 24, respectively. These data further support the potential benefit of microbiome repair with SER-109 following antibiotics for rCDI to prevent recurrence in high-risk patients. Financial support: This study was funded by Seres Therapeutics. Disclosure: None |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10594104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105941042023-10-25 Integrated efficacy analysis from phase 3 studies of investigational microbiome therapeutic, SER-109, in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection Sims, Matthew Silverman, Michael Louie, Thomas Wang, Elaine Kraft, Colleen Ramesh, Mayur Bogdanovich, Tatiana Brady, Kelly Lombardi, David Memisoglu, Asli De, Ananya Hasson, Brooke Lee, Christine Feuerstadt, Paul Pardi, Darrell Kelly, Colleen Daley, Peter Oguchi, Godson McGovern, Barbara Moltke, Lisa Von Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol C. difficile Background: Antibiotics alone are often insufficient to treat recurrent C. difficile infection (rCDI) because they have no activity against C. difficile spores that germinate within a disrupted microbiome. SER-109, an investigational, oral, microbiome therapeutic comprised of purified Firmicutes spores, was designed to reduce rCDI through microbiome repair. We report an integrated efficacy analysis through week 24 for SER-109 from phase 3 studies, ECOSPOR III and ECOSPOR IV. Methods: ECOSPOR III was a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial conducted at 56 US or Canadian sites that included 182 participants with ≥2 CDI recurrences, confirmed via toxin EIA testing. Participants were stratified by age (<65 years or ≥65 years) and antibiotic regimen (vancomycin, fidaxomicin) and were randomized 1:1 to placebo or SER-109 groups. ECOSPOR IV was an open-label, single-arm study conducted at 72 US or Canadian sites including 263 participants with rCDI enrolled in 2 cohorts: (1) rollover participants from ECOSPOR III who experienced on-study recurrence diagnosed by toxin EIA (n = 29) and (2) participants with ≥1 CDI recurrence (diagnosed by PCR or toxin EIA), inclusive of the current episode (n = 234). In both studies, the investigational product was administered orally as 4 capsules over 3 consecutive days following symptom resolution after standard-of-care antibiotics. The primary efficacy end point was rCDI (recurrent toxin-positive diarrhea requiring treatment) through week 8. Other end points included CDI recurrence rates and safety through 24 weeks. Results: These 349 participants received at least 1 dose of SER-109 in ECOSPOR III or ECOSPOR IV (mean age 64.2; 68.8% female). Overall, 77 participants (22.1%) enrolled with their first CDI recurrence. Four participants received blinded SER-109 in ECOSPOR III followed by a second dose of open-label SER-109 in ECOSPOR IV. Overall, the proportion of participants who received any dose of SER-109 with rCDI at week 8 was 9.5% (33 of 349; 95% CI, 6.6 %–13.0%), and the CDI recurrence rate remained low through 24 weeks (15.2%, 53 of 349; 95% CI, 11.6%–19.4%), corresponding to sustained clinical response rates of 90.5% (95% CI, 87.0%–93.4%) and 84.8% (95% CI, 80.6%–88.4%), respectively (Fig. 1). Most rollover participants (25 of 29, 86.2%) were from the placebo arm; 13.8% had rCDI by week 8. Conclusions: In this integrated analysis, the rates of rCDI were low and durable in participants who received the investigational microbiome therapeutic SER-109, with sustained clinical response rates of 90.5% and 84.8% at weeks 8 and 24, respectively. These data further support the potential benefit of microbiome repair with SER-109 following antibiotics for rCDI to prevent recurrence in high-risk patients. Financial support: This study was funded by Seres Therapeutics. Disclosure: None Cambridge University Press 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10594104/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.214 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | C. difficile Sims, Matthew Silverman, Michael Louie, Thomas Wang, Elaine Kraft, Colleen Ramesh, Mayur Bogdanovich, Tatiana Brady, Kelly Lombardi, David Memisoglu, Asli De, Ananya Hasson, Brooke Lee, Christine Feuerstadt, Paul Pardi, Darrell Kelly, Colleen Daley, Peter Oguchi, Godson McGovern, Barbara Moltke, Lisa Von Integrated efficacy analysis from phase 3 studies of investigational microbiome therapeutic, SER-109, in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection |
title | Integrated efficacy analysis from phase 3 studies of investigational microbiome therapeutic, SER-109, in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection |
title_full | Integrated efficacy analysis from phase 3 studies of investigational microbiome therapeutic, SER-109, in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection |
title_fullStr | Integrated efficacy analysis from phase 3 studies of investigational microbiome therapeutic, SER-109, in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Integrated efficacy analysis from phase 3 studies of investigational microbiome therapeutic, SER-109, in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection |
title_short | Integrated efficacy analysis from phase 3 studies of investigational microbiome therapeutic, SER-109, in recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection |
title_sort | integrated efficacy analysis from phase 3 studies of investigational microbiome therapeutic, ser-109, in recurrent clostridioides difficile infection |
topic | C. difficile |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594104/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simsmatthew integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT silvermanmichael integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT louiethomas integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT wangelaine integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT kraftcolleen integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT rameshmayur integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT bogdanovichtatiana integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT bradykelly integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT lombardidavid integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT memisogluasli integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT deananya integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT hassonbrooke integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT leechristine integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT feuerstadtpaul integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT pardidarrell integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT kellycolleen integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT daleypeter integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT oguchigodson integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT mcgovernbarbara integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection AT moltkelisavon integratedefficacyanalysisfromphase3studiesofinvestigationalmicrobiometherapeuticser109inrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfection |