Cargando…
Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes
Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a serious healthcare-associated infection responsible for >12,000 US deaths annually. Overtesting can lead to antibiotic overuse and potential patient harm when patients are colonized with C. difficile, but not infected, yet treated. Nationa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594234/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.280 |
_version_ | 1785124603031453696 |
---|---|
author | Doughman, Danielle Weber, David Mavrogiorgos, Nikolaos Summerlin-Long, Shelley Swartwood, Michael Commanday, Alexander Stancill, Lisa Kane, Nicholas Vavalle, Emily Sickbert-Bennett |
author_facet | Doughman, Danielle Weber, David Mavrogiorgos, Nikolaos Summerlin-Long, Shelley Swartwood, Michael Commanday, Alexander Stancill, Lisa Kane, Nicholas Vavalle, Emily Sickbert-Bennett |
author_sort | Doughman, Danielle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a serious healthcare-associated infection responsible for >12,000 US deaths annually. Overtesting can lead to antibiotic overuse and potential patient harm when patients are colonized with C. difficile, but not infected, yet treated. National guidelines recommend when testing is appropriate; occasionally, guideline-noncompliant testing (GNCT) may be warranted. A multidisciplinary group at UNC Medical Center (UNCMC) including the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) used a best-practice alert in 2020 to improve diagnostic stewardship, to no effect. Evidence supports use of hard stops for this purpose, though less is known about provider acceptance. Methods: Beginning in May 2022, UNCMC implemented a hard stop in its electronic medical record system (EMR) for C. difficile GNCT orders, with exceptions to be approved by an ASP attending physician. Requests were retrospectively reviewed May–November 2022 to monitor for adverse patient outcomes and provider hard-stop compliance. The team exported data from the EMR (Epic Systems) and generated descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel. Results: There were 85 GNCT orders during the study period. Most tests (62%) were reviewed by the ASP, and 38% sought non-ASP or no approval. Of the tests reviewed by the ASP, 33 (62%) were approved and 20 (38%) were not. Among tests not approved by the ASP, no patients subsequently received CDI-directed antibiotics, and 1 patient (5%) warranted same-admission CDI testing (negative). Of tests that circumvented ASP review, 18 (56%) ordering providers received a follow-up email from an associate chief medical officer to determine the rationale. No single response type dominated: 3 (17%) were unaware of the ASP review requirement, 2 (11%) indicated their patient’s uncharted refusal of laxatives, 2 (11%) indicated another patient-specific reason. Provider avoidance of the ASP approval mechanism decreased 38%, from 53% of noncompliant tests in month 1 to 33% of tests in month 6. Total tests orders dropped 15.5% from 1,129 during the same period in 2021 to 954 during the study period (95% CI, 13.4%–17.7%). Compliance with the guideline component requiring at least a 48-hour laxative-free interval prior to CDI testing increased from 85% (95% CI, 83%–87%) to 95% (95% CI, 93%–96%). CDI incidence rates decreased from 0.52 per 1,000 patient days (95% CI, 0.41–0.65) to 0.41 (95% CI, 0.32–0.53), though the change was neither significant at P = .05 nor attributable to any 1 intervention. Conclusions: Over time and with feedback to providers circumventing the exception process, providers accepted and used the hard stop, improving diagnostic stewardship and avoiding unneeded treatment. Disclosures: None |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10594234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105942342023-10-25 Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes Doughman, Danielle Weber, David Mavrogiorgos, Nikolaos Summerlin-Long, Shelley Swartwood, Michael Commanday, Alexander Stancill, Lisa Kane, Nicholas Vavalle, Emily Sickbert-Bennett Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol C. difficile Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a serious healthcare-associated infection responsible for >12,000 US deaths annually. Overtesting can lead to antibiotic overuse and potential patient harm when patients are colonized with C. difficile, but not infected, yet treated. National guidelines recommend when testing is appropriate; occasionally, guideline-noncompliant testing (GNCT) may be warranted. A multidisciplinary group at UNC Medical Center (UNCMC) including the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) used a best-practice alert in 2020 to improve diagnostic stewardship, to no effect. Evidence supports use of hard stops for this purpose, though less is known about provider acceptance. Methods: Beginning in May 2022, UNCMC implemented a hard stop in its electronic medical record system (EMR) for C. difficile GNCT orders, with exceptions to be approved by an ASP attending physician. Requests were retrospectively reviewed May–November 2022 to monitor for adverse patient outcomes and provider hard-stop compliance. The team exported data from the EMR (Epic Systems) and generated descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel. Results: There were 85 GNCT orders during the study period. Most tests (62%) were reviewed by the ASP, and 38% sought non-ASP or no approval. Of the tests reviewed by the ASP, 33 (62%) were approved and 20 (38%) were not. Among tests not approved by the ASP, no patients subsequently received CDI-directed antibiotics, and 1 patient (5%) warranted same-admission CDI testing (negative). Of tests that circumvented ASP review, 18 (56%) ordering providers received a follow-up email from an associate chief medical officer to determine the rationale. No single response type dominated: 3 (17%) were unaware of the ASP review requirement, 2 (11%) indicated their patient’s uncharted refusal of laxatives, 2 (11%) indicated another patient-specific reason. Provider avoidance of the ASP approval mechanism decreased 38%, from 53% of noncompliant tests in month 1 to 33% of tests in month 6. Total tests orders dropped 15.5% from 1,129 during the same period in 2021 to 954 during the study period (95% CI, 13.4%–17.7%). Compliance with the guideline component requiring at least a 48-hour laxative-free interval prior to CDI testing increased from 85% (95% CI, 83%–87%) to 95% (95% CI, 93%–96%). CDI incidence rates decreased from 0.52 per 1,000 patient days (95% CI, 0.41–0.65) to 0.41 (95% CI, 0.32–0.53), though the change was neither significant at P = .05 nor attributable to any 1 intervention. Conclusions: Over time and with feedback to providers circumventing the exception process, providers accepted and used the hard stop, improving diagnostic stewardship and avoiding unneeded treatment. Disclosures: None Cambridge University Press 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10594234/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.280 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | C. difficile Doughman, Danielle Weber, David Mavrogiorgos, Nikolaos Summerlin-Long, Shelley Swartwood, Michael Commanday, Alexander Stancill, Lisa Kane, Nicholas Vavalle, Emily Sickbert-Bennett Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes |
title | Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes |
title_full | Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes |
title_fullStr | Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes |
title_short | Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes |
title_sort | effects of a hard stop for c. difficile testing: provider uptake and patient outcomes |
topic | C. difficile |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594234/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doughmandanielle effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes AT weberdavid effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes AT mavrogiorgosnikolaos effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes AT summerlinlongshelley effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes AT swartwoodmichael effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes AT commandayalexander effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes AT stancilllisa effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes AT kanenicholas effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes AT vavalleemilysickbertbennett effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes |