Cargando…

Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a serious healthcare-associated infection responsible for >12,000 US deaths annually. Overtesting can lead to antibiotic overuse and potential patient harm when patients are colonized with C. difficile, but not infected, yet treated. Nationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doughman, Danielle, Weber, David, Mavrogiorgos, Nikolaos, Summerlin-Long, Shelley, Swartwood, Michael, Commanday, Alexander, Stancill, Lisa, Kane, Nicholas, Vavalle, Emily Sickbert-Bennett
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594234/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.280
_version_ 1785124603031453696
author Doughman, Danielle
Weber, David
Mavrogiorgos, Nikolaos
Summerlin-Long, Shelley
Swartwood, Michael
Commanday, Alexander
Stancill, Lisa
Kane, Nicholas
Vavalle, Emily Sickbert-Bennett
author_facet Doughman, Danielle
Weber, David
Mavrogiorgos, Nikolaos
Summerlin-Long, Shelley
Swartwood, Michael
Commanday, Alexander
Stancill, Lisa
Kane, Nicholas
Vavalle, Emily Sickbert-Bennett
author_sort Doughman, Danielle
collection PubMed
description Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a serious healthcare-associated infection responsible for >12,000 US deaths annually. Overtesting can lead to antibiotic overuse and potential patient harm when patients are colonized with C. difficile, but not infected, yet treated. National guidelines recommend when testing is appropriate; occasionally, guideline-noncompliant testing (GNCT) may be warranted. A multidisciplinary group at UNC Medical Center (UNCMC) including the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) used a best-practice alert in 2020 to improve diagnostic stewardship, to no effect. Evidence supports use of hard stops for this purpose, though less is known about provider acceptance. Methods: Beginning in May 2022, UNCMC implemented a hard stop in its electronic medical record system (EMR) for C. difficile GNCT orders, with exceptions to be approved by an ASP attending physician. Requests were retrospectively reviewed May–November 2022 to monitor for adverse patient outcomes and provider hard-stop compliance. The team exported data from the EMR (Epic Systems) and generated descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel. Results: There were 85 GNCT orders during the study period. Most tests (62%) were reviewed by the ASP, and 38% sought non-ASP or no approval. Of the tests reviewed by the ASP, 33 (62%) were approved and 20 (38%) were not. Among tests not approved by the ASP, no patients subsequently received CDI-directed antibiotics, and 1 patient (5%) warranted same-admission CDI testing (negative). Of tests that circumvented ASP review, 18 (56%) ordering providers received a follow-up email from an associate chief medical officer to determine the rationale. No single response type dominated: 3 (17%) were unaware of the ASP review requirement, 2 (11%) indicated their patient’s uncharted refusal of laxatives, 2 (11%) indicated another patient-specific reason. Provider avoidance of the ASP approval mechanism decreased 38%, from 53% of noncompliant tests in month 1 to 33% of tests in month 6. Total tests orders dropped 15.5% from 1,129 during the same period in 2021 to 954 during the study period (95% CI, 13.4%–17.7%). Compliance with the guideline component requiring at least a 48-hour laxative-free interval prior to CDI testing increased from 85% (95% CI, 83%–87%) to 95% (95% CI, 93%–96%). CDI incidence rates decreased from 0.52 per 1,000 patient days (95% CI, 0.41–0.65) to 0.41 (95% CI, 0.32–0.53), though the change was neither significant at P = .05 nor attributable to any 1 intervention. Conclusions: Over time and with feedback to providers circumventing the exception process, providers accepted and used the hard stop, improving diagnostic stewardship and avoiding unneeded treatment. Disclosures: None
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10594234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105942342023-10-25 Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes Doughman, Danielle Weber, David Mavrogiorgos, Nikolaos Summerlin-Long, Shelley Swartwood, Michael Commanday, Alexander Stancill, Lisa Kane, Nicholas Vavalle, Emily Sickbert-Bennett Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol C. difficile Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a serious healthcare-associated infection responsible for >12,000 US deaths annually. Overtesting can lead to antibiotic overuse and potential patient harm when patients are colonized with C. difficile, but not infected, yet treated. National guidelines recommend when testing is appropriate; occasionally, guideline-noncompliant testing (GNCT) may be warranted. A multidisciplinary group at UNC Medical Center (UNCMC) including the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) used a best-practice alert in 2020 to improve diagnostic stewardship, to no effect. Evidence supports use of hard stops for this purpose, though less is known about provider acceptance. Methods: Beginning in May 2022, UNCMC implemented a hard stop in its electronic medical record system (EMR) for C. difficile GNCT orders, with exceptions to be approved by an ASP attending physician. Requests were retrospectively reviewed May–November 2022 to monitor for adverse patient outcomes and provider hard-stop compliance. The team exported data from the EMR (Epic Systems) and generated descriptive statistics in Microsoft Excel. Results: There were 85 GNCT orders during the study period. Most tests (62%) were reviewed by the ASP, and 38% sought non-ASP or no approval. Of the tests reviewed by the ASP, 33 (62%) were approved and 20 (38%) were not. Among tests not approved by the ASP, no patients subsequently received CDI-directed antibiotics, and 1 patient (5%) warranted same-admission CDI testing (negative). Of tests that circumvented ASP review, 18 (56%) ordering providers received a follow-up email from an associate chief medical officer to determine the rationale. No single response type dominated: 3 (17%) were unaware of the ASP review requirement, 2 (11%) indicated their patient’s uncharted refusal of laxatives, 2 (11%) indicated another patient-specific reason. Provider avoidance of the ASP approval mechanism decreased 38%, from 53% of noncompliant tests in month 1 to 33% of tests in month 6. Total tests orders dropped 15.5% from 1,129 during the same period in 2021 to 954 during the study period (95% CI, 13.4%–17.7%). Compliance with the guideline component requiring at least a 48-hour laxative-free interval prior to CDI testing increased from 85% (95% CI, 83%–87%) to 95% (95% CI, 93%–96%). CDI incidence rates decreased from 0.52 per 1,000 patient days (95% CI, 0.41–0.65) to 0.41 (95% CI, 0.32–0.53), though the change was neither significant at P = .05 nor attributable to any 1 intervention. Conclusions: Over time and with feedback to providers circumventing the exception process, providers accepted and used the hard stop, improving diagnostic stewardship and avoiding unneeded treatment. Disclosures: None Cambridge University Press 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10594234/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.280 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle C. difficile
Doughman, Danielle
Weber, David
Mavrogiorgos, Nikolaos
Summerlin-Long, Shelley
Swartwood, Michael
Commanday, Alexander
Stancill, Lisa
Kane, Nicholas
Vavalle, Emily Sickbert-Bennett
Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes
title Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes
title_full Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes
title_fullStr Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes
title_short Effects of a hard stop for C. difficile testing: Provider uptake and patient outcomes
title_sort effects of a hard stop for c. difficile testing: provider uptake and patient outcomes
topic C. difficile
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594234/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.280
work_keys_str_mv AT doughmandanielle effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes
AT weberdavid effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes
AT mavrogiorgosnikolaos effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes
AT summerlinlongshelley effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes
AT swartwoodmichael effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes
AT commandayalexander effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes
AT stancilllisa effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes
AT kanenicholas effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes
AT vavalleemilysickbertbennett effectsofahardstopforcdifficiletestingprovideruptakeandpatientoutcomes