Cargando…

Assessing inpatient antibiotic use during COVID-19 surges with or without infectious diseases consultation

Background: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, increased inappropriate antibiotic use (AU) drove concern for antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship efforts are critical for combatting antimicrobial resistance. Our objective was to compare AU between SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variant s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tommasi, Nicole, Doron, Shira, Andujar-Vazquez, Gabriela, Campion, Maureen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594266/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.261
_version_ 1785124610337931264
author Tommasi, Nicole
Doron, Shira
Andujar-Vazquez, Gabriela
Campion, Maureen
author_facet Tommasi, Nicole
Doron, Shira
Andujar-Vazquez, Gabriela
Campion, Maureen
author_sort Tommasi, Nicole
collection PubMed
description Background: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, increased inappropriate antibiotic use (AU) drove concern for antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship efforts are critical for combatting antimicrobial resistance. Our objective was to compare AU between SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variant surge periods in COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Tufts Medical Center (TMC) in Boston. Infectious diseases consultation (IDC) was mandatory for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 throughout the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant surge. During the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant surge, IDC was optional for certain patient populations. Instead, the antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) reviewed these patients for appropriate medical management. We hypothesized that AU would increase during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant surge compared to the delta variant surge due to optional IDC because IDC would reduce inappropriate AU for suspected viral pneumonia. Methods: Retrospective medical record review of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variant surges was conducted. We collected data regarding vital signs, white blood cell count (WBC), length of stay (LOS), steroid use, IDC, and AU (defined as percentage of patients receiving at least 1 antibiotic dose), with a separate category for antibiotics commonly used for bacterial pneumonia (ampicillin-sulbactam, azithromycin, cefepime, cefpodoxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, doxycycline, piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin). We determined that 71 patients from each group were needed to detect an absolute difference of 20% in AU between surges with 75% power, based on the CDC estimate that 80% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 receive an antibiotic. Unpaired t tests and χ(2) analyses were conducted on demographic data. Inferential statistics assessed for differences between the 2 SARS-CoV-2 variant surges in AU and days of therapy (DOT), supplemental oxygen (SaO(2)), steroid use, and IDC utilizing a Wilcoxon rank-sum test and logistic regression analyses. Results: Results showed no significant differences in AU between surges (38.0% during the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant surge vs 42.3% during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant surge; P = .131). Disease severity was not different between surges as measured by steroid use, initial WBC, and SaO(2). WBC was a predictor for AU in both surges (delta surge, P = 0.007; omicron surge, P = .002). Average LOS was higher throughout the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant surge for all patients (11.58 days during the delta surge, vs 5.97 days during the omicron variant surge; P = .047) and those who received antibiotics (18.44 days during the delta variant surge vs 6.70 days dring the omicron variant surge; P = .210). Total DOT was significantly longer during the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant surge for all antibiotics (463 DOT during the delta variant surge vs 277 DOT during the omicron variant surge; P = .047) and antibiotics commonly used for bacterial pneumonia (315 DOT during the delta variant surge vs 202 DOT during the omicron variant surge; P = .021). Conclusions: Making IDC optional for certain patient populations diagnosed with COVID-19 did not affect AU in a large, urban academic medical center with a comprehensive ASP. Disclosures: None
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10594266
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105942662023-10-25 Assessing inpatient antibiotic use during COVID-19 surges with or without infectious diseases consultation Tommasi, Nicole Doron, Shira Andujar-Vazquez, Gabriela Campion, Maureen Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Antibiotic Stewardship Background: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, increased inappropriate antibiotic use (AU) drove concern for antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship efforts are critical for combatting antimicrobial resistance. Our objective was to compare AU between SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variant surge periods in COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Tufts Medical Center (TMC) in Boston. Infectious diseases consultation (IDC) was mandatory for patients diagnosed with COVID-19 throughout the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant surge. During the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant surge, IDC was optional for certain patient populations. Instead, the antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) reviewed these patients for appropriate medical management. We hypothesized that AU would increase during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant surge compared to the delta variant surge due to optional IDC because IDC would reduce inappropriate AU for suspected viral pneumonia. Methods: Retrospective medical record review of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 during the SARS-CoV-2 delta and omicron variant surges was conducted. We collected data regarding vital signs, white blood cell count (WBC), length of stay (LOS), steroid use, IDC, and AU (defined as percentage of patients receiving at least 1 antibiotic dose), with a separate category for antibiotics commonly used for bacterial pneumonia (ampicillin-sulbactam, azithromycin, cefepime, cefpodoxime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, doxycycline, piperacillin-tazobactam, vancomycin). We determined that 71 patients from each group were needed to detect an absolute difference of 20% in AU between surges with 75% power, based on the CDC estimate that 80% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 receive an antibiotic. Unpaired t tests and χ(2) analyses were conducted on demographic data. Inferential statistics assessed for differences between the 2 SARS-CoV-2 variant surges in AU and days of therapy (DOT), supplemental oxygen (SaO(2)), steroid use, and IDC utilizing a Wilcoxon rank-sum test and logistic regression analyses. Results: Results showed no significant differences in AU between surges (38.0% during the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant surge vs 42.3% during the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant surge; P = .131). Disease severity was not different between surges as measured by steroid use, initial WBC, and SaO(2). WBC was a predictor for AU in both surges (delta surge, P = 0.007; omicron surge, P = .002). Average LOS was higher throughout the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant surge for all patients (11.58 days during the delta surge, vs 5.97 days during the omicron variant surge; P = .047) and those who received antibiotics (18.44 days during the delta variant surge vs 6.70 days dring the omicron variant surge; P = .210). Total DOT was significantly longer during the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant surge for all antibiotics (463 DOT during the delta variant surge vs 277 DOT during the omicron variant surge; P = .047) and antibiotics commonly used for bacterial pneumonia (315 DOT during the delta variant surge vs 202 DOT during the omicron variant surge; P = .021). Conclusions: Making IDC optional for certain patient populations diagnosed with COVID-19 did not affect AU in a large, urban academic medical center with a comprehensive ASP. Disclosures: None Cambridge University Press 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10594266/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.261 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Antibiotic Stewardship
Tommasi, Nicole
Doron, Shira
Andujar-Vazquez, Gabriela
Campion, Maureen
Assessing inpatient antibiotic use during COVID-19 surges with or without infectious diseases consultation
title Assessing inpatient antibiotic use during COVID-19 surges with or without infectious diseases consultation
title_full Assessing inpatient antibiotic use during COVID-19 surges with or without infectious diseases consultation
title_fullStr Assessing inpatient antibiotic use during COVID-19 surges with or without infectious diseases consultation
title_full_unstemmed Assessing inpatient antibiotic use during COVID-19 surges with or without infectious diseases consultation
title_short Assessing inpatient antibiotic use during COVID-19 surges with or without infectious diseases consultation
title_sort assessing inpatient antibiotic use during covid-19 surges with or without infectious diseases consultation
topic Antibiotic Stewardship
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594266/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2023.261
work_keys_str_mv AT tommasinicole assessinginpatientantibioticuseduringcovid19surgeswithorwithoutinfectiousdiseasesconsultation
AT doronshira assessinginpatientantibioticuseduringcovid19surgeswithorwithoutinfectiousdiseasesconsultation
AT andujarvazquezgabriela assessinginpatientantibioticuseduringcovid19surgeswithorwithoutinfectiousdiseasesconsultation
AT campionmaureen assessinginpatientantibioticuseduringcovid19surgeswithorwithoutinfectiousdiseasesconsultation