Cargando…

Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is an important contributor to poor outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. We previously showed that volatile anesthetics such as isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane provided robust protection against SAH-induced DCI, but the impact of a mor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Meizi, Jayaraman, Keshav, Nelson, James W., Mehla, Jogender, Diwan, Deepti, Vellimana, Ananth K., Zipfel, Gregory J., Athiraman, Umeshkumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37873774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases11040130
_version_ 1785124650848616448
author Liu, Meizi
Jayaraman, Keshav
Nelson, James W.
Mehla, Jogender
Diwan, Deepti
Vellimana, Ananth K.
Zipfel, Gregory J.
Athiraman, Umeshkumar
author_facet Liu, Meizi
Jayaraman, Keshav
Nelson, James W.
Mehla, Jogender
Diwan, Deepti
Vellimana, Ananth K.
Zipfel, Gregory J.
Athiraman, Umeshkumar
author_sort Liu, Meizi
collection PubMed
description Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is an important contributor to poor outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. We previously showed that volatile anesthetics such as isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane provided robust protection against SAH-induced DCI, but the impact of a more commonly used intravenous anesthetic agent, propofol, is not known. The goal of our current study is to examine the neurovascular protective effects of propofol on SAH-induced DCI. Twelve-week-old male wild-type mice were utilized for the study. Mice underwent endovascular perforation SAH or sham surgery followed one hour later by propofol infusion through the internal jugular vein (2 mg/kg/min continuous intravenous infusion). Large artery vasospasm was assessed three days after SAH. Neurological outcome assessment was performed at baseline and then daily until animal sacrifice. Statistical analysis was performed via one-way ANOVA and two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test with significance set at p < 0.05. Intravenous propofol did not provide any protection against large artery vasospasm or sensory–motor neurological deficits induced by SAH. Our data show that propofol did not afford significant protection against SAH-induced DCI. These results are consistent with recent clinical studies that suggest that the neurovascular protection afforded by anesthetic conditioning is critically dependent on the class of anesthetic agent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10594442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105944422023-10-25 Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Liu, Meizi Jayaraman, Keshav Nelson, James W. Mehla, Jogender Diwan, Deepti Vellimana, Ananth K. Zipfel, Gregory J. Athiraman, Umeshkumar Diseases Brief Report Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is an important contributor to poor outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. We previously showed that volatile anesthetics such as isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane provided robust protection against SAH-induced DCI, but the impact of a more commonly used intravenous anesthetic agent, propofol, is not known. The goal of our current study is to examine the neurovascular protective effects of propofol on SAH-induced DCI. Twelve-week-old male wild-type mice were utilized for the study. Mice underwent endovascular perforation SAH or sham surgery followed one hour later by propofol infusion through the internal jugular vein (2 mg/kg/min continuous intravenous infusion). Large artery vasospasm was assessed three days after SAH. Neurological outcome assessment was performed at baseline and then daily until animal sacrifice. Statistical analysis was performed via one-way ANOVA and two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test with significance set at p < 0.05. Intravenous propofol did not provide any protection against large artery vasospasm or sensory–motor neurological deficits induced by SAH. Our data show that propofol did not afford significant protection against SAH-induced DCI. These results are consistent with recent clinical studies that suggest that the neurovascular protection afforded by anesthetic conditioning is critically dependent on the class of anesthetic agent. MDPI 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10594442/ /pubmed/37873774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases11040130 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Liu, Meizi
Jayaraman, Keshav
Nelson, James W.
Mehla, Jogender
Diwan, Deepti
Vellimana, Ananth K.
Zipfel, Gregory J.
Athiraman, Umeshkumar
Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
title Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
title_full Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
title_fullStr Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
title_full_unstemmed Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
title_short Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
title_sort propofol affords no protection against delayed cerebral ischemia in a mouse model of subarachnoid hemorrhage
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37873774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases11040130
work_keys_str_mv AT liumeizi propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage
AT jayaramankeshav propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage
AT nelsonjamesw propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage
AT mehlajogender propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage
AT diwandeepti propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage
AT vellimanaananthk propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage
AT zipfelgregoryj propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage
AT athiramanumeshkumar propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage