Cargando…
Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is an important contributor to poor outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. We previously showed that volatile anesthetics such as isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane provided robust protection against SAH-induced DCI, but the impact of a mor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37873774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases11040130 |
_version_ | 1785124650848616448 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Meizi Jayaraman, Keshav Nelson, James W. Mehla, Jogender Diwan, Deepti Vellimana, Ananth K. Zipfel, Gregory J. Athiraman, Umeshkumar |
author_facet | Liu, Meizi Jayaraman, Keshav Nelson, James W. Mehla, Jogender Diwan, Deepti Vellimana, Ananth K. Zipfel, Gregory J. Athiraman, Umeshkumar |
author_sort | Liu, Meizi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is an important contributor to poor outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. We previously showed that volatile anesthetics such as isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane provided robust protection against SAH-induced DCI, but the impact of a more commonly used intravenous anesthetic agent, propofol, is not known. The goal of our current study is to examine the neurovascular protective effects of propofol on SAH-induced DCI. Twelve-week-old male wild-type mice were utilized for the study. Mice underwent endovascular perforation SAH or sham surgery followed one hour later by propofol infusion through the internal jugular vein (2 mg/kg/min continuous intravenous infusion). Large artery vasospasm was assessed three days after SAH. Neurological outcome assessment was performed at baseline and then daily until animal sacrifice. Statistical analysis was performed via one-way ANOVA and two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test with significance set at p < 0.05. Intravenous propofol did not provide any protection against large artery vasospasm or sensory–motor neurological deficits induced by SAH. Our data show that propofol did not afford significant protection against SAH-induced DCI. These results are consistent with recent clinical studies that suggest that the neurovascular protection afforded by anesthetic conditioning is critically dependent on the class of anesthetic agent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10594442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105944422023-10-25 Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Liu, Meizi Jayaraman, Keshav Nelson, James W. Mehla, Jogender Diwan, Deepti Vellimana, Ananth K. Zipfel, Gregory J. Athiraman, Umeshkumar Diseases Brief Report Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is an important contributor to poor outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients. We previously showed that volatile anesthetics such as isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane provided robust protection against SAH-induced DCI, but the impact of a more commonly used intravenous anesthetic agent, propofol, is not known. The goal of our current study is to examine the neurovascular protective effects of propofol on SAH-induced DCI. Twelve-week-old male wild-type mice were utilized for the study. Mice underwent endovascular perforation SAH or sham surgery followed one hour later by propofol infusion through the internal jugular vein (2 mg/kg/min continuous intravenous infusion). Large artery vasospasm was assessed three days after SAH. Neurological outcome assessment was performed at baseline and then daily until animal sacrifice. Statistical analysis was performed via one-way ANOVA and two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test with significance set at p < 0.05. Intravenous propofol did not provide any protection against large artery vasospasm or sensory–motor neurological deficits induced by SAH. Our data show that propofol did not afford significant protection against SAH-induced DCI. These results are consistent with recent clinical studies that suggest that the neurovascular protection afforded by anesthetic conditioning is critically dependent on the class of anesthetic agent. MDPI 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10594442/ /pubmed/37873774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases11040130 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Liu, Meizi Jayaraman, Keshav Nelson, James W. Mehla, Jogender Diwan, Deepti Vellimana, Ananth K. Zipfel, Gregory J. Athiraman, Umeshkumar Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage |
title | Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage |
title_full | Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage |
title_fullStr | Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage |
title_full_unstemmed | Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage |
title_short | Propofol Affords No Protection against Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage |
title_sort | propofol affords no protection against delayed cerebral ischemia in a mouse model of subarachnoid hemorrhage |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37873774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diseases11040130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liumeizi propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage AT jayaramankeshav propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage AT nelsonjamesw propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage AT mehlajogender propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage AT diwandeepti propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage AT vellimanaananthk propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage AT zipfelgregoryj propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage AT athiramanumeshkumar propofolaffordsnoprotectionagainstdelayedcerebralischemiainamousemodelofsubarachnoidhemorrhage |