Cargando…

Prospective study of pain and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a tale of two pain assessment methods

BACKGROUND: Accurate pain assessment is essential in the emergency department (ED) triage process. Overestimation of pain intensity, however, can lead to unnecessary overtriage. The study aimed to investigate the influence of pain on patient outcomes and how pain intensity modulates the triage’s pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ku, Nai-Wen, Cheng, Ming-Tai, Liew, Chiat Qiao, Chen, Yun Chang, Sung, Chih-Wei, Ko, Chia-Hsin, Lu, Tsung-Chien, Huang, Chien-Hua, Tsai, Chu-Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37872561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01130-9
_version_ 1785124729598771200
author Ku, Nai-Wen
Cheng, Ming-Tai
Liew, Chiat Qiao
Chen, Yun Chang
Sung, Chih-Wei
Ko, Chia-Hsin
Lu, Tsung-Chien
Huang, Chien-Hua
Tsai, Chu-Lin
author_facet Ku, Nai-Wen
Cheng, Ming-Tai
Liew, Chiat Qiao
Chen, Yun Chang
Sung, Chih-Wei
Ko, Chia-Hsin
Lu, Tsung-Chien
Huang, Chien-Hua
Tsai, Chu-Lin
author_sort Ku, Nai-Wen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate pain assessment is essential in the emergency department (ED) triage process. Overestimation of pain intensity, however, can lead to unnecessary overtriage. The study aimed to investigate the influence of pain on patient outcomes and how pain intensity modulates the triage’s predictive capabilities on these outcomes. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, enrolling adult patients in the triage station. The entire triage process was captured on video. Two pain assessment methods were employed: (1) Self-reported pain score in the Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale, referred to as the system-based method; (2) Five physicians independently assigned triage levels and assessed pain scores from video footage, termed the physician-based method. The primary outcome was hospitalization, and secondary outcomes included ED length of stay (EDLOS) and ED charges. RESULTS: Of the 656 patients evaluated, the median self-reported pain score was 4 (interquartile range, 0–7), while the median physician-rated pain score was 1.5 (interquartile range, 0–3). Increased self-reported pain severity was not associated with prolonged EDLOS and increased ED charges, but a positive association was identified with physician-rated pain scores. Using the system-based method, the predictive efficacy of triage scales was lower in the pain groups than in the pain-free group (area under the receiver operating curve, [AUROC]: 0.615 vs. 0.637). However, with the physician-based method, triage scales were more effective in predicting hospitalization among patients with pain than those without (AUROC: 0.650 vs. 0.636). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported pain seemed to diminish the predictive accuracy of triage for hospitalization. In contrast, physician-rated pain scores were positively associated with longer EDLOS, increased ED charges, and enhanced triage predictive capability for hospitalization. Pain, therefore, appears to modulate the relationship between triage and patient outcomes, highlighting the need for careful pain evaluation in the ED. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-023-01130-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10594810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105948102023-10-25 Prospective study of pain and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a tale of two pain assessment methods Ku, Nai-Wen Cheng, Ming-Tai Liew, Chiat Qiao Chen, Yun Chang Sung, Chih-Wei Ko, Chia-Hsin Lu, Tsung-Chien Huang, Chien-Hua Tsai, Chu-Lin Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Accurate pain assessment is essential in the emergency department (ED) triage process. Overestimation of pain intensity, however, can lead to unnecessary overtriage. The study aimed to investigate the influence of pain on patient outcomes and how pain intensity modulates the triage’s predictive capabilities on these outcomes. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, enrolling adult patients in the triage station. The entire triage process was captured on video. Two pain assessment methods were employed: (1) Self-reported pain score in the Taiwan Triage and Acuity Scale, referred to as the system-based method; (2) Five physicians independently assigned triage levels and assessed pain scores from video footage, termed the physician-based method. The primary outcome was hospitalization, and secondary outcomes included ED length of stay (EDLOS) and ED charges. RESULTS: Of the 656 patients evaluated, the median self-reported pain score was 4 (interquartile range, 0–7), while the median physician-rated pain score was 1.5 (interquartile range, 0–3). Increased self-reported pain severity was not associated with prolonged EDLOS and increased ED charges, but a positive association was identified with physician-rated pain scores. Using the system-based method, the predictive efficacy of triage scales was lower in the pain groups than in the pain-free group (area under the receiver operating curve, [AUROC]: 0.615 vs. 0.637). However, with the physician-based method, triage scales were more effective in predicting hospitalization among patients with pain than those without (AUROC: 0.650 vs. 0.636). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported pain seemed to diminish the predictive accuracy of triage for hospitalization. In contrast, physician-rated pain scores were positively associated with longer EDLOS, increased ED charges, and enhanced triage predictive capability for hospitalization. Pain, therefore, appears to modulate the relationship between triage and patient outcomes, highlighting the need for careful pain evaluation in the ED. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-023-01130-9. BioMed Central 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10594810/ /pubmed/37872561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01130-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ku, Nai-Wen
Cheng, Ming-Tai
Liew, Chiat Qiao
Chen, Yun Chang
Sung, Chih-Wei
Ko, Chia-Hsin
Lu, Tsung-Chien
Huang, Chien-Hua
Tsai, Chu-Lin
Prospective study of pain and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a tale of two pain assessment methods
title Prospective study of pain and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a tale of two pain assessment methods
title_full Prospective study of pain and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a tale of two pain assessment methods
title_fullStr Prospective study of pain and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a tale of two pain assessment methods
title_full_unstemmed Prospective study of pain and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a tale of two pain assessment methods
title_short Prospective study of pain and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a tale of two pain assessment methods
title_sort prospective study of pain and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a tale of two pain assessment methods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37872561
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-023-01130-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kunaiwen prospectivestudyofpainandpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentataleoftwopainassessmentmethods
AT chengmingtai prospectivestudyofpainandpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentataleoftwopainassessmentmethods
AT liewchiatqiao prospectivestudyofpainandpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentataleoftwopainassessmentmethods
AT chenyunchang prospectivestudyofpainandpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentataleoftwopainassessmentmethods
AT sungchihwei prospectivestudyofpainandpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentataleoftwopainassessmentmethods
AT kochiahsin prospectivestudyofpainandpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentataleoftwopainassessmentmethods
AT lutsungchien prospectivestudyofpainandpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentataleoftwopainassessmentmethods
AT huangchienhua prospectivestudyofpainandpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentataleoftwopainassessmentmethods
AT tsaichulin prospectivestudyofpainandpatientoutcomesintheemergencydepartmentataleoftwopainassessmentmethods