Cargando…

Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review

Research examining the prevalence and impacts of stalking on mental health professionals (MHPs) has grown over the last two decades. Yet only one previous review has been undertaken examining impacts on staff and focusing on clients as stalkers, with prevalence estimated between 10% and 13%. This sy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Natashia, Sheridan, Lorraine, Robertson, Noelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36373712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248380221129581
_version_ 1785124738400518144
author Harris, Natashia
Sheridan, Lorraine
Robertson, Noelle
author_facet Harris, Natashia
Sheridan, Lorraine
Robertson, Noelle
author_sort Harris, Natashia
collection PubMed
description Research examining the prevalence and impacts of stalking on mental health professionals (MHPs) has grown over the last two decades. Yet only one previous review has been undertaken examining impacts on staff and focusing on clients as stalkers, with prevalence estimated between 10% and 13%. This systematic review sought to assess prevalence of stalking, and associated impacts and methods of coping reported by MHPs, irrespective of perpetrator type. The search included all healthcare professional groups working in a mental health setting, reported in English or with available translation. Secondary searches were conducted through references cited in primary papers. Of the 7,060 papers identified in five databases, 11 peer-reviewed papers met rigorous inclusion criteria and were quality appraised. Reviewed studies reported prevalence rates between 10.2% and 50%, with higher quality papers reporting a narrower band, 13.9% and 14.3%. However, substantial variability in stalking definitions, and quality of methodology precluded precise prevalence estimation. Participants within the included studies disclosed significant adverse impacts on confidence and competence at work as a consequence of their experiences. Staff invoked substantial workplace and lifestyle changes to mitigate impacts of stalking. However, studies revealed staff disclosed stalking by perpetrators other than clients, notably colleagues and intimate partners, as often or more frequently than by clients. Limitations of the included research and future directions are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10594846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105948462023-10-25 Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review Harris, Natashia Sheridan, Lorraine Robertson, Noelle Trauma Violence Abuse Review Manuscripts Research examining the prevalence and impacts of stalking on mental health professionals (MHPs) has grown over the last two decades. Yet only one previous review has been undertaken examining impacts on staff and focusing on clients as stalkers, with prevalence estimated between 10% and 13%. This systematic review sought to assess prevalence of stalking, and associated impacts and methods of coping reported by MHPs, irrespective of perpetrator type. The search included all healthcare professional groups working in a mental health setting, reported in English or with available translation. Secondary searches were conducted through references cited in primary papers. Of the 7,060 papers identified in five databases, 11 peer-reviewed papers met rigorous inclusion criteria and were quality appraised. Reviewed studies reported prevalence rates between 10.2% and 50%, with higher quality papers reporting a narrower band, 13.9% and 14.3%. However, substantial variability in stalking definitions, and quality of methodology precluded precise prevalence estimation. Participants within the included studies disclosed significant adverse impacts on confidence and competence at work as a consequence of their experiences. Staff invoked substantial workplace and lifestyle changes to mitigate impacts of stalking. However, studies revealed staff disclosed stalking by perpetrators other than clients, notably colleagues and intimate partners, as often or more frequently than by clients. Limitations of the included research and future directions are discussed. SAGE Publications 2022-11-13 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10594846/ /pubmed/36373712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248380221129581 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Manuscripts
Harris, Natashia
Sheridan, Lorraine
Robertson, Noelle
Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review
title Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review
title_full Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review
title_short Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review
title_sort prevalence and psychosocial impacts of stalking on mental health professionals: a systematic review
topic Review Manuscripts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36373712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248380221129581
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisnatashia prevalenceandpsychosocialimpactsofstalkingonmentalhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview
AT sheridanlorraine prevalenceandpsychosocialimpactsofstalkingonmentalhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview
AT robertsonnoelle prevalenceandpsychosocialimpactsofstalkingonmentalhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview