Cargando…
Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review
Research examining the prevalence and impacts of stalking on mental health professionals (MHPs) has grown over the last two decades. Yet only one previous review has been undertaken examining impacts on staff and focusing on clients as stalkers, with prevalence estimated between 10% and 13%. This sy...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36373712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248380221129581 |
_version_ | 1785124738400518144 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Natashia Sheridan, Lorraine Robertson, Noelle |
author_facet | Harris, Natashia Sheridan, Lorraine Robertson, Noelle |
author_sort | Harris, Natashia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research examining the prevalence and impacts of stalking on mental health professionals (MHPs) has grown over the last two decades. Yet only one previous review has been undertaken examining impacts on staff and focusing on clients as stalkers, with prevalence estimated between 10% and 13%. This systematic review sought to assess prevalence of stalking, and associated impacts and methods of coping reported by MHPs, irrespective of perpetrator type. The search included all healthcare professional groups working in a mental health setting, reported in English or with available translation. Secondary searches were conducted through references cited in primary papers. Of the 7,060 papers identified in five databases, 11 peer-reviewed papers met rigorous inclusion criteria and were quality appraised. Reviewed studies reported prevalence rates between 10.2% and 50%, with higher quality papers reporting a narrower band, 13.9% and 14.3%. However, substantial variability in stalking definitions, and quality of methodology precluded precise prevalence estimation. Participants within the included studies disclosed significant adverse impacts on confidence and competence at work as a consequence of their experiences. Staff invoked substantial workplace and lifestyle changes to mitigate impacts of stalking. However, studies revealed staff disclosed stalking by perpetrators other than clients, notably colleagues and intimate partners, as often or more frequently than by clients. Limitations of the included research and future directions are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10594846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105948462023-10-25 Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review Harris, Natashia Sheridan, Lorraine Robertson, Noelle Trauma Violence Abuse Review Manuscripts Research examining the prevalence and impacts of stalking on mental health professionals (MHPs) has grown over the last two decades. Yet only one previous review has been undertaken examining impacts on staff and focusing on clients as stalkers, with prevalence estimated between 10% and 13%. This systematic review sought to assess prevalence of stalking, and associated impacts and methods of coping reported by MHPs, irrespective of perpetrator type. The search included all healthcare professional groups working in a mental health setting, reported in English or with available translation. Secondary searches were conducted through references cited in primary papers. Of the 7,060 papers identified in five databases, 11 peer-reviewed papers met rigorous inclusion criteria and were quality appraised. Reviewed studies reported prevalence rates between 10.2% and 50%, with higher quality papers reporting a narrower band, 13.9% and 14.3%. However, substantial variability in stalking definitions, and quality of methodology precluded precise prevalence estimation. Participants within the included studies disclosed significant adverse impacts on confidence and competence at work as a consequence of their experiences. Staff invoked substantial workplace and lifestyle changes to mitigate impacts of stalking. However, studies revealed staff disclosed stalking by perpetrators other than clients, notably colleagues and intimate partners, as often or more frequently than by clients. Limitations of the included research and future directions are discussed. SAGE Publications 2022-11-13 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10594846/ /pubmed/36373712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248380221129581 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Manuscripts Harris, Natashia Sheridan, Lorraine Robertson, Noelle Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review |
title | Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Prevalence and Psychosocial Impacts of Stalking on Mental Health Professionals: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | prevalence and psychosocial impacts of stalking on mental health professionals: a systematic review |
topic | Review Manuscripts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36373712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248380221129581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisnatashia prevalenceandpsychosocialimpactsofstalkingonmentalhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview AT sheridanlorraine prevalenceandpsychosocialimpactsofstalkingonmentalhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview AT robertsonnoelle prevalenceandpsychosocialimpactsofstalkingonmentalhealthprofessionalsasystematicreview |