Cargando…

Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the shaping ability of different instruments, TruNatomy Glider (TRN-G), WaveOne Gold Glider (WOG-G), and ProGlider (Pro-G) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). METHODS: The mesial canals of 27 mandibular molars with two separate mesial canals and modera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeniçeri Özata, Merve, Falakaloğlu, Seda, Keleş, Ali, Adıgüzel, Özkan, Gündoğar, Mustafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03529-3
_version_ 1785124747509497856
author Yeniçeri Özata, Merve
Falakaloğlu, Seda
Keleş, Ali
Adıgüzel, Özkan
Gündoğar, Mustafa
author_facet Yeniçeri Özata, Merve
Falakaloğlu, Seda
Keleş, Ali
Adıgüzel, Özkan
Gündoğar, Mustafa
author_sort Yeniçeri Özata, Merve
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the shaping ability of different instruments, TruNatomy Glider (TRN-G), WaveOne Gold Glider (WOG-G), and ProGlider (Pro-G) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). METHODS: The mesial canals of 27 mandibular molars with two separate mesial canals and moderate curvature were included in this study [n = 27 mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) root canal]. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the glide path was created with TRN-G, WOG-G, and Pro-G glide path instruments (n = 9 MB and ML root canal in each group). Micro-CT scanning was performed before and after preparation. Mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) transportation and the centering ratio were measured at three levels within the canal (3, 5 and 7 mm). A three-way robust ANOVA was used to compare the parameters. RESULTS: TRN-G showed significantly greater transportation in the MD direction than the other instruments throughout the root canal (overall root canal) (p < 0.05). The best centering ability in the BL direction was shown by the WOG-G, regardless of level within the canal and canal distinction (MB vs. ML) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups according to the level within the canal and canal parameters (p > 0.05). Whether the root canal was MB or ML did not affect centering or transportation (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Glide path instruments can be used to shape moderately curved canals with minimal apical transportation and better centering ability. All three tested glide path files can used safely before the shaping file.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10594883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105948832023-10-25 Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study Yeniçeri Özata, Merve Falakaloğlu, Seda Keleş, Ali Adıgüzel, Özkan Gündoğar, Mustafa BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the shaping ability of different instruments, TruNatomy Glider (TRN-G), WaveOne Gold Glider (WOG-G), and ProGlider (Pro-G) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). METHODS: The mesial canals of 27 mandibular molars with two separate mesial canals and moderate curvature were included in this study [n = 27 mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) root canal]. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the glide path was created with TRN-G, WOG-G, and Pro-G glide path instruments (n = 9 MB and ML root canal in each group). Micro-CT scanning was performed before and after preparation. Mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) transportation and the centering ratio were measured at three levels within the canal (3, 5 and 7 mm). A three-way robust ANOVA was used to compare the parameters. RESULTS: TRN-G showed significantly greater transportation in the MD direction than the other instruments throughout the root canal (overall root canal) (p < 0.05). The best centering ability in the BL direction was shown by the WOG-G, regardless of level within the canal and canal distinction (MB vs. ML) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups according to the level within the canal and canal parameters (p > 0.05). Whether the root canal was MB or ML did not affect centering or transportation (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Glide path instruments can be used to shape moderately curved canals with minimal apical transportation and better centering ability. All three tested glide path files can used safely before the shaping file. BioMed Central 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10594883/ /pubmed/37875946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03529-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Yeniçeri Özata, Merve
Falakaloğlu, Seda
Keleş, Ali
Adıgüzel, Özkan
Gündoğar, Mustafa
Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study
title Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study
title_full Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study
title_fullStr Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study
title_short Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study
title_sort evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03529-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yeniceriozatamerve evaluationofshapingabilityofdifferentglidepathinstrumentsamicrocomputedtomographystudy
AT falakalogluseda evaluationofshapingabilityofdifferentglidepathinstrumentsamicrocomputedtomographystudy
AT kelesali evaluationofshapingabilityofdifferentglidepathinstrumentsamicrocomputedtomographystudy
AT adıguzelozkan evaluationofshapingabilityofdifferentglidepathinstrumentsamicrocomputedtomographystudy
AT gundogarmustafa evaluationofshapingabilityofdifferentglidepathinstrumentsamicrocomputedtomographystudy