Cargando…

Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not enter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Yaşar, Burak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04294-3
_version_ 1785124750356381696
author Yaşar, Burak
author_facet Yaşar, Burak
author_sort Yaşar, Burak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. METHODS: Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland’s total active motion grading system. RESULTS: The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: − 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-04294-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10594895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105948952023-10-25 Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study Yaşar, Burak J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Peritendinous adhesion is the most common complication of tendon repairs in the hand and often requires surgical intervention, resulting in increased labor loss and increased treatment costs. Many agents used to reduce tendon adhesion in animal models, however these agents have not entered clinical use. This study is the first-ever clinical study that evaluates encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet as an anti-adhesion barrier. METHODS: Between December 2014 and January 2020, 156 patients included in this study, with clean cut isolated flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon injury in flexor tendon zone 2. All tendons repaired with modified double Kessler technique. In 76 patients, tendon repair site encircled with collagen sheet. 80 patients were randomly selected from our clinical records and functional results are compared with Strickland’s total active motion grading system. RESULTS: The mean total range of motion was 79% in the control group and 81% in the collagen sheet group, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (Z: − 1.393, p = 0.164). In the control group, very good and good repair according to Strikland classification was 65/80 (81%). In the collagen sheet group, it was 62/76 (82%), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between 5 FDP TAM measurements between collagen sheet and control group (t(35) = 0.29, p = 0.016, p < 0.05). The mean TAM of the 5 FDP tendons in the collagen sheet group: 83.8 (SD: 8.2) in the and 76.1 (SD: 9.5) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time in the literature, functional results of Zone 2 flexor tendon repair using collagen sheets in patients with clean cut tendon injuries reported. However, there were no statistical difference about total active motion between control and collagen sheet group, 5th FDS tendon repairs encircled with collagen sheets had better outcomes. Prospective studies in patient groups with high adhesion risk are recommended. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-04294-3. BioMed Central 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10594895/ /pubmed/37875954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04294-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yaşar, Burak
Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study
title Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study
title_full Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study
title_fullStr Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study
title_short Encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study
title_sort encircling tendon repair site with collagen sheet in flexor zone 2: retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04294-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yasarburak encirclingtendonrepairsitewithcollagensheetinflexorzone2retrospectivestudy