Cargando…

Clinical impact of spacer placement surgery with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sheet for particle therapy

BACKGROUND: Spacer placement surgery is useful in particle therapy (PT) for patients with abdominopelvic malignant tumors located adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract. This study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of spacer placement surgery using an expanded polytetraflu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fujinaka, Ryosuke, Komatsu, Shohei, Terashima, Kazuki, Demizu, Yusuke, Omiya, Satoshi, Kido, Masahiro, Toyama, Hirochika, Tokumaru, Sunao, Okimoto, Tomoaki, Fukumoto, Takumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594906/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02359-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Spacer placement surgery is useful in particle therapy (PT) for patients with abdominopelvic malignant tumors located adjacent to the gastrointestinal tract. This study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of spacer placement surgery using an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) spacer. METHODS: This study included 131 patients who underwent ePTFE spacer placement surgery and subsequent PT between September 2006 and June 2019. The overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Spacer-related complications were classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0). RESULTS: The median follow-up period after spacer placement surgery was 36.8 months. The 3-year estimated OS and LC rates were 60.5% and 76.5%, respectively. A total of 130 patients (99.2%) were able to complete PT. Spacer-related complications of ≥ grade 3 were observed in four patients (3.1%) in the acute phase and 13 patients (9.9%) in the late phase. Ten patients (7.6%) required removal of the ePTFE spacer. CONCLUSIONS: Spacer placement surgery using an ePTFE spacer for abdominopelvic malignant tumors is technically feasible and acceptable for subsequent PT. However, severe spacer-related late complications were observed in some patients. Since long-term placement of a non-absorbable ePTFE spacer is associated with risks for morbidity and infection, careful long-term follow-up and prompt therapeutic intervention are essential when complications associated with the ePTFE spacer occur. TRIAL REGISTRATION: retrospectively registered. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-023-02359-5.