Cargando…
Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
BACKGROUND: Motor impairments are very common in neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Noninvasive brain stimulation could influence the motor function of patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01266-w |
_version_ | 1785124758420979712 |
---|---|
author | Nombela-Cabrera, Rafael Pérez-Nombela, Soraya Avendaño-Coy, Juan Comino-Suárez, Natalia Arroyo-Fernández, Rubén Gómez-Soriano, Julio Serrano-Muñoz, Diego |
author_facet | Nombela-Cabrera, Rafael Pérez-Nombela, Soraya Avendaño-Coy, Juan Comino-Suárez, Natalia Arroyo-Fernández, Rubén Gómez-Soriano, Julio Serrano-Muñoz, Diego |
author_sort | Nombela-Cabrera, Rafael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Motor impairments are very common in neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Noninvasive brain stimulation could influence the motor function of patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on balance and gait ability in patients with multiple sclerosis. Additionally, a secondary aim was to compare the influence of the stimulation location of tDCS on current effectiveness. METHODS: A search was conducted for randomized controlled trials published up to May 2023 comparing the application of tDCS versus a sham or control group. The primary outcome variables were balance and gait ability. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and ten were included in the quantitative analysis, which included 230 patients with multiple sclerosis. The average effect of tDCS on gait functionality was superior to that of the control group (SMD = -0.71; 95% CI, -1.05 to -0.37). However, the overall results of the tDCS vs. sham effect on static balance did not show significant differences between groups (MD = 1.26, 95% CI, -1.31 to 3.82). No significant differences were found when different locations of tDCS were compared. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal that tDCS is an effective treatment for improving gait ability with a low quality of evidence. However, the application of tDCS has no effect on static balance in patients with multiple sclerosis with very low quality of evidence. Similarly, there seems to be no difference regarding the stimulation area with tDCS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01266-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10594930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105949302023-10-25 Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Nombela-Cabrera, Rafael Pérez-Nombela, Soraya Avendaño-Coy, Juan Comino-Suárez, Natalia Arroyo-Fernández, Rubén Gómez-Soriano, Julio Serrano-Muñoz, Diego J Neuroeng Rehabil Review BACKGROUND: Motor impairments are very common in neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Noninvasive brain stimulation could influence the motor function of patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on balance and gait ability in patients with multiple sclerosis. Additionally, a secondary aim was to compare the influence of the stimulation location of tDCS on current effectiveness. METHODS: A search was conducted for randomized controlled trials published up to May 2023 comparing the application of tDCS versus a sham or control group. The primary outcome variables were balance and gait ability. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and ten were included in the quantitative analysis, which included 230 patients with multiple sclerosis. The average effect of tDCS on gait functionality was superior to that of the control group (SMD = -0.71; 95% CI, -1.05 to -0.37). However, the overall results of the tDCS vs. sham effect on static balance did not show significant differences between groups (MD = 1.26, 95% CI, -1.31 to 3.82). No significant differences were found when different locations of tDCS were compared. CONCLUSIONS: These results reveal that tDCS is an effective treatment for improving gait ability with a low quality of evidence. However, the application of tDCS has no effect on static balance in patients with multiple sclerosis with very low quality of evidence. Similarly, there seems to be no difference regarding the stimulation area with tDCS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-023-01266-w. BioMed Central 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10594930/ /pubmed/37875941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01266-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Nombela-Cabrera, Rafael Pérez-Nombela, Soraya Avendaño-Coy, Juan Comino-Suárez, Natalia Arroyo-Fernández, Rubén Gómez-Soriano, Julio Serrano-Muñoz, Diego Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title | Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full | Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_short | Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_sort | effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on balance and gait in patients with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10594930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-023-01266-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nombelacabrerarafael effectivenessoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonbalanceandgaitinpatientswithmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT pereznombelasoraya effectivenessoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonbalanceandgaitinpatientswithmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT avendanocoyjuan effectivenessoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonbalanceandgaitinpatientswithmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT cominosuareznatalia effectivenessoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonbalanceandgaitinpatientswithmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT arroyofernandezruben effectivenessoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonbalanceandgaitinpatientswithmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT gomezsorianojulio effectivenessoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonbalanceandgaitinpatientswithmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT serranomunozdiego effectivenessoftranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationonbalanceandgaitinpatientswithmultiplesclerosissystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials |