Cargando…

Measuring Digital Health Literacy in Europe – Scope, determinants and consequences

BACKGROUND: Increasing access to health-related digital information/resources of varied quality warrants sufficient Digital Health Literacy (DHL) in the population. Public health researchers, practitioners, and policy makers need to consider DHL for improving people's ability to use digital res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levin-Zamir, D, Van den Broucke, S, Schaeffer, D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595120/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.305
_version_ 1785124793310248960
author Levin-Zamir, D
Van den Broucke, S
Schaeffer, D
author_facet Levin-Zamir, D
Van den Broucke, S
Schaeffer, D
author_sort Levin-Zamir, D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing access to health-related digital information/resources of varied quality warrants sufficient Digital Health Literacy (DHL) in the population. Public health researchers, practitioners, and policy makers need to consider DHL for improving people's ability to use digital resources. The M-POHL HLS19 study objectives were to construct and validate a DHL measure, and identify its determinants and consequences. METHODS: A scale was constructed with 8 items on dealing with digital health resources. Two additional items examined interactive use of resources. The scale was applied among a sample of 29,060 respondents in 13 countries using CAPI, CATI, CAWI, PAPI and mixed methods. A standardized score was calculated for DHL, range: 0-100. RESULTS: Appraising the reliability of digital resources was perceived particularly difficult. The scale showed acceptable reliability (Cronbach's α 0.7-0.87/country). A confirmatory factor model loading onto a single latent variable indicated an acceptable fit for all countries. The DHL scale was sufficiently unidimensional based on principal component analysis of Rasch model residuals combined with dependent t-tests. Linear regression models with 5 DHL predictors showed a social gradient with explained variance of 6% (2-23%/country). The highest predictor was financial deprivation: ß=−0.15 (0.08--0.27), then age: ß=−0.13 (0.15--0.26); self-assessed social status: ß=0.08 (0.05-0.13). General health literacy was a strong predictor: ß=0.51 (0.43-0.67). In linear regressions to explain variance in self-assessed health, the DHL coefficient was significantly different from zero in 9 countries (ß=−0.05-0.10). CONCLUSIONS: The new DHL scale had acceptable psychometric properties. The relevance of DHL is reflected in the high proportions with lower DHL, a social gradient, and health consequences in most countries. The study offers an evidence base for tailoring DHL intervention strategies and organizational health literacy policy. KEY MESSAGES: • Digital Health Literacy of populations in Europe was estimated through a validated measure with associations that predict public health and healthcare consequences in most countries. • Public health practitioners and policy makers should be aware of populations with lower Digital Health Literacy (DHL), and both promote DHL while also adjusting interventions/services to DHL needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105951202023-10-25 Measuring Digital Health Literacy in Europe – Scope, determinants and consequences Levin-Zamir, D Van den Broucke, S Schaeffer, D Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Increasing access to health-related digital information/resources of varied quality warrants sufficient Digital Health Literacy (DHL) in the population. Public health researchers, practitioners, and policy makers need to consider DHL for improving people's ability to use digital resources. The M-POHL HLS19 study objectives were to construct and validate a DHL measure, and identify its determinants and consequences. METHODS: A scale was constructed with 8 items on dealing with digital health resources. Two additional items examined interactive use of resources. The scale was applied among a sample of 29,060 respondents in 13 countries using CAPI, CATI, CAWI, PAPI and mixed methods. A standardized score was calculated for DHL, range: 0-100. RESULTS: Appraising the reliability of digital resources was perceived particularly difficult. The scale showed acceptable reliability (Cronbach's α 0.7-0.87/country). A confirmatory factor model loading onto a single latent variable indicated an acceptable fit for all countries. The DHL scale was sufficiently unidimensional based on principal component analysis of Rasch model residuals combined with dependent t-tests. Linear regression models with 5 DHL predictors showed a social gradient with explained variance of 6% (2-23%/country). The highest predictor was financial deprivation: ß=−0.15 (0.08--0.27), then age: ß=−0.13 (0.15--0.26); self-assessed social status: ß=0.08 (0.05-0.13). General health literacy was a strong predictor: ß=0.51 (0.43-0.67). In linear regressions to explain variance in self-assessed health, the DHL coefficient was significantly different from zero in 9 countries (ß=−0.05-0.10). CONCLUSIONS: The new DHL scale had acceptable psychometric properties. The relevance of DHL is reflected in the high proportions with lower DHL, a social gradient, and health consequences in most countries. The study offers an evidence base for tailoring DHL intervention strategies and organizational health literacy policy. KEY MESSAGES: • Digital Health Literacy of populations in Europe was estimated through a validated measure with associations that predict public health and healthcare consequences in most countries. • Public health practitioners and policy makers should be aware of populations with lower Digital Health Literacy (DHL), and both promote DHL while also adjusting interventions/services to DHL needs. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595120/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.305 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Levin-Zamir, D
Van den Broucke, S
Schaeffer, D
Measuring Digital Health Literacy in Europe – Scope, determinants and consequences
title Measuring Digital Health Literacy in Europe – Scope, determinants and consequences
title_full Measuring Digital Health Literacy in Europe – Scope, determinants and consequences
title_fullStr Measuring Digital Health Literacy in Europe – Scope, determinants and consequences
title_full_unstemmed Measuring Digital Health Literacy in Europe – Scope, determinants and consequences
title_short Measuring Digital Health Literacy in Europe – Scope, determinants and consequences
title_sort measuring digital health literacy in europe – scope, determinants and consequences
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595120/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.305
work_keys_str_mv AT levinzamird measuringdigitalhealthliteracyineuropescopedeterminantsandconsequences
AT vandenbrouckes measuringdigitalhealthliteracyineuropescopedeterminantsandconsequences
AT schaefferd measuringdigitalhealthliteracyineuropescopedeterminantsandconsequences