Cargando…

Investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre

When two previously fit and well staff from a wildlife rescue centre were hospitalised in early September 2018 with severe pneumonia and meningitis symptoms, the Health Protection Team began an investigation. Possible diagnoses included influenza and legionella, although it was not flu season, and i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purcell, B, Harvey Vince, L, McManus, O, Crook, P, Letts, A, Murphy, A, Kane, U, Sheehan, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595129/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.325
_version_ 1785124795437809664
author Purcell, B
Harvey Vince, L
McManus, O
Crook, P
Letts, A
Murphy, A
Kane, U
Sheehan, S
author_facet Purcell, B
Harvey Vince, L
McManus, O
Crook, P
Letts, A
Murphy, A
Kane, U
Sheehan, S
author_sort Purcell, B
collection PubMed
description When two previously fit and well staff from a wildlife rescue centre were hospitalised in early September 2018 with severe pneumonia and meningitis symptoms, the Health Protection Team began an investigation. Possible diagnoses included influenza and legionella, although it was not flu season, and initial testing proved negative. There were reports of other staff illness over the preceding weeks. The centre had accepted a wide range species over the Summer, including high numbers of gulls and pigeons, and an outbreak of psittacosis was suspected; the patients responded rapidly to doxycycline. An incident management team was rapidly convened to investigate and determine control measures. A testing algorithm was developed: including for Influenza A&B, Urine legionella & pneumococcal antigen; reference laboratory serology testing and real-time PCR for Chlamydia.psittaci; and pan-corona viruses. Case finding was conducted by telephone interviews and a select-survey of all 55 staff gained 46 responses. A series of site visits examined working practices at the site. Avian and environmental sampling was undertaken. A total of 22 staff met the agreed case definition for psittacosis, five of whom were later confirmed. Clinical features ranged from mild to severe. The onset dates of illness ranged from July to September. There was no evidence of person-to-person transmission. Analysis did not show a clear correlation between PPE use and illness. Clinical, microbiological, environmental, veterinary, and epidemiological evidence indicated zoonotic transmission of psittacosis. Variable compliance with PPE, hygiene when handling birds, and disinfection had likely contributed via aerosolization of dust. This was likely exacerbated by very high bird stocks and unusually warm weather conditions. Comprehensive recommendations were made to reduce the chances of future outbreaks, which are generalisable to other countries. KEY MESSAGES: • This was one of the largest clusters of human psittacosis described in a workplace in England. • Biosecurity in animal rescue centres is crucial to limit the chance of psittacosis and other zoonoses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105951292023-10-25 Investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre Purcell, B Harvey Vince, L McManus, O Crook, P Letts, A Murphy, A Kane, U Sheehan, S Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme When two previously fit and well staff from a wildlife rescue centre were hospitalised in early September 2018 with severe pneumonia and meningitis symptoms, the Health Protection Team began an investigation. Possible diagnoses included influenza and legionella, although it was not flu season, and initial testing proved negative. There were reports of other staff illness over the preceding weeks. The centre had accepted a wide range species over the Summer, including high numbers of gulls and pigeons, and an outbreak of psittacosis was suspected; the patients responded rapidly to doxycycline. An incident management team was rapidly convened to investigate and determine control measures. A testing algorithm was developed: including for Influenza A&B, Urine legionella & pneumococcal antigen; reference laboratory serology testing and real-time PCR for Chlamydia.psittaci; and pan-corona viruses. Case finding was conducted by telephone interviews and a select-survey of all 55 staff gained 46 responses. A series of site visits examined working practices at the site. Avian and environmental sampling was undertaken. A total of 22 staff met the agreed case definition for psittacosis, five of whom were later confirmed. Clinical features ranged from mild to severe. The onset dates of illness ranged from July to September. There was no evidence of person-to-person transmission. Analysis did not show a clear correlation between PPE use and illness. Clinical, microbiological, environmental, veterinary, and epidemiological evidence indicated zoonotic transmission of psittacosis. Variable compliance with PPE, hygiene when handling birds, and disinfection had likely contributed via aerosolization of dust. This was likely exacerbated by very high bird stocks and unusually warm weather conditions. Comprehensive recommendations were made to reduce the chances of future outbreaks, which are generalisable to other countries. KEY MESSAGES: • This was one of the largest clusters of human psittacosis described in a workplace in England. • Biosecurity in animal rescue centres is crucial to limit the chance of psittacosis and other zoonoses. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595129/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.325 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Purcell, B
Harvey Vince, L
McManus, O
Crook, P
Letts, A
Murphy, A
Kane, U
Sheehan, S
Investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre
title Investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre
title_full Investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre
title_fullStr Investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre
title_short Investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre
title_sort investigation of an unusual cluster of illness among staff at a wildlife rescue centre
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595129/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.325
work_keys_str_mv AT purcellb investigationofanunusualclusterofillnessamongstaffatawildliferescuecentre
AT harveyvincel investigationofanunusualclusterofillnessamongstaffatawildliferescuecentre
AT mcmanuso investigationofanunusualclusterofillnessamongstaffatawildliferescuecentre
AT crookp investigationofanunusualclusterofillnessamongstaffatawildliferescuecentre
AT lettsa investigationofanunusualclusterofillnessamongstaffatawildliferescuecentre
AT murphya investigationofanunusualclusterofillnessamongstaffatawildliferescuecentre
AT kaneu investigationofanunusualclusterofillnessamongstaffatawildliferescuecentre
AT sheehans investigationofanunusualclusterofillnessamongstaffatawildliferescuecentre