Cargando…

An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study to measure digital public health system maturity

BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic showed how crucial digital public health (DiPH) interventions are for continuous treatment and system sustainability. Several studies highlighted how the digital system transformation might improve access to and quality of healthcare services. However, there is no c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maass, L, Zeeb, H, Rothgang, H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595206/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.164
_version_ 1785124814207320064
author Maass, L
Zeeb, H
Rothgang, H
author_facet Maass, L
Zeeb, H
Rothgang, H
author_sort Maass, L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic showed how crucial digital public health (DiPH) interventions are for continuous treatment and system sustainability. Several studies highlighted how the digital system transformation might improve access to and quality of healthcare services. However, there is no consensus on how to best assess the national readiness for the digitalization of such systems. Therefore, this Delphi study aimed to collect indicators to measure the maturity of DiPH systems nationally. METHODS: The three-stage international and interdisciplinary Delphi study included 82 experts. During the first round, participants proposed indicators to measure maturity among the technological and legal requirements of DiPH tools, the willingness of the general public to use them, and the degree of application of DiPH tools to the national healthcare system. The suggestions were qualitatively assessed and presented for ranking on a 4-point Likert scale during the second round. Experts were also able to rephrase or add indicators. In the third round, experts could only rank indicators. RESULTS: Finally, 96 indicators to measure the maturity of DiPH systems were finally. Of these, 31 fall under the legal and 24 under the technological requirements. 26 assess the social level and 15 the degree of application. All dimensions can be clustered into 3-4 sub-groups each. The qualitative analysis highlighted the importance of data protection regulations, affordable smartphone and internet access, interoperability between interventions, financial incentives, user motivation and literacy, and whether interventions were implemented as local pilots or national services. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified indicators for interdisciplinary assessing DiPH system maturity. While this Delphi can’t answer how best to integrate these indicators into national health system evaluation procedures, this approach is an essential first step towards an index to measure the maturity of DiPH systems. KEY MESSAGES: • When assessing the digital public health system's maturity, one needs to include legal, technological, and social influencing aspects and not only evaluate the health services implementation degree. • International and interdisciplinary Delphi study panels are vital for finding consensus on indicators to create tools of international importance and usability to measure health system maturity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105952062023-10-25 An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study to measure digital public health system maturity Maass, L Zeeb, H Rothgang, H Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic showed how crucial digital public health (DiPH) interventions are for continuous treatment and system sustainability. Several studies highlighted how the digital system transformation might improve access to and quality of healthcare services. However, there is no consensus on how to best assess the national readiness for the digitalization of such systems. Therefore, this Delphi study aimed to collect indicators to measure the maturity of DiPH systems nationally. METHODS: The three-stage international and interdisciplinary Delphi study included 82 experts. During the first round, participants proposed indicators to measure maturity among the technological and legal requirements of DiPH tools, the willingness of the general public to use them, and the degree of application of DiPH tools to the national healthcare system. The suggestions were qualitatively assessed and presented for ranking on a 4-point Likert scale during the second round. Experts were also able to rephrase or add indicators. In the third round, experts could only rank indicators. RESULTS: Finally, 96 indicators to measure the maturity of DiPH systems were finally. Of these, 31 fall under the legal and 24 under the technological requirements. 26 assess the social level and 15 the degree of application. All dimensions can be clustered into 3-4 sub-groups each. The qualitative analysis highlighted the importance of data protection regulations, affordable smartphone and internet access, interoperability between interventions, financial incentives, user motivation and literacy, and whether interventions were implemented as local pilots or national services. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified indicators for interdisciplinary assessing DiPH system maturity. While this Delphi can’t answer how best to integrate these indicators into national health system evaluation procedures, this approach is an essential first step towards an index to measure the maturity of DiPH systems. KEY MESSAGES: • When assessing the digital public health system's maturity, one needs to include legal, technological, and social influencing aspects and not only evaluate the health services implementation degree. • International and interdisciplinary Delphi study panels are vital for finding consensus on indicators to create tools of international importance and usability to measure health system maturity. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595206/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.164 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Maass, L
Zeeb, H
Rothgang, H
An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study to measure digital public health system maturity
title An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study to measure digital public health system maturity
title_full An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study to measure digital public health system maturity
title_fullStr An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study to measure digital public health system maturity
title_full_unstemmed An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study to measure digital public health system maturity
title_short An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study to measure digital public health system maturity
title_sort international and interdisciplinary delphi study to measure digital public health system maturity
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595206/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.164
work_keys_str_mv AT maassl aninternationalandinterdisciplinarydelphistudytomeasuredigitalpublichealthsystemmaturity
AT zeebh aninternationalandinterdisciplinarydelphistudytomeasuredigitalpublichealthsystemmaturity
AT rothgangh aninternationalandinterdisciplinarydelphistudytomeasuredigitalpublichealthsystemmaturity
AT maassl internationalandinterdisciplinarydelphistudytomeasuredigitalpublichealthsystemmaturity
AT zeebh internationalandinterdisciplinarydelphistudytomeasuredigitalpublichealthsystemmaturity
AT rothgangh internationalandinterdisciplinarydelphistudytomeasuredigitalpublichealthsystemmaturity