Cargando…

Communicating evidence synthesis: co-designing summary formats with end users

BACKGROUND: Evidence syntheses are essential to the creation of evidence-based guidelines that guide health care. Findings from our recent mixed methods systematic review (MMSR) identified no gold standard format for communicating summaries of evidence syntheses to guideline development groups. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murray, R, Lynch, R, O'Neill, M, Smith, S M, Mahtani, K R, Ryan, M, Clyne, B, Sharp, M K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595227/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.034
_version_ 1785124819426082816
author Murray, R
Lynch, R
O'Neill, M
Smith, S M
Mahtani, K R
Ryan, M
Clyne, B
Sharp, M K
author_facet Murray, R
Lynch, R
O'Neill, M
Smith, S M
Mahtani, K R
Ryan, M
Clyne, B
Sharp, M K
author_sort Murray, R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence syntheses are essential to the creation of evidence-based guidelines that guide health care. Findings from our recent mixed methods systematic review (MMSR) identified no gold standard format for communicating summaries of evidence syntheses to guideline development groups. This is important as these groups are comprised of patients, healthcare providers, policymakers, etc., who all have different expertise, perspectives and priorities. Our overall aim is to develop evidence-informed prototype summary formats for use in guideline development. To inform this process, we held online co-design focus group workshops shaped by findings from our MMSR. METHODS: We held six focus groups with 30 participants involved in developing guidelines and/or evidence synthesis (February - March 2023). The topic guide was informed by the MMSR -- focusing on recommendations with mixed methods support, ≥3 supporting studies, and those prioritised by an expert advisory group through a pragmatic prioritisation exercise using the MoSCoW method (Must, Should, Could, and Will not haves). Focus groups were recorded and transcripts were analysed using a directed content analysis. RESULTS: Participants suggested a “less-is-more” structured approach that minimises methodological steps and statistical data, promoting accessibility to all audiences by judicious use of links to the full technical report. They emphasized the importance of concise consistently-presented formats which emphasize key messages, flag readers to indicators of trust in the producers (i.e., logos, websites, and conflict of interest statements), and highlight the quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Project findings are informing the creation of accessible and actionable guidance on best-practices for creating summary formats. Next steps involve user-testing prototype formats through semi-structured interviews which will then be integrated into the National Clinical Guideline development process in Ireland. KEY MESSAGES: • Co-design workshops delineated key aspects of effective and acceptable evidence synthesis summary formats to help create reproducible format templates for use in clinical guideline development. • Creating summary formats accessible to all guideline development group members will promote better communication and translation of research evidence into recommendations and practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105952272023-10-25 Communicating evidence synthesis: co-designing summary formats with end users Murray, R Lynch, R O'Neill, M Smith, S M Mahtani, K R Ryan, M Clyne, B Sharp, M K Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Evidence syntheses are essential to the creation of evidence-based guidelines that guide health care. Findings from our recent mixed methods systematic review (MMSR) identified no gold standard format for communicating summaries of evidence syntheses to guideline development groups. This is important as these groups are comprised of patients, healthcare providers, policymakers, etc., who all have different expertise, perspectives and priorities. Our overall aim is to develop evidence-informed prototype summary formats for use in guideline development. To inform this process, we held online co-design focus group workshops shaped by findings from our MMSR. METHODS: We held six focus groups with 30 participants involved in developing guidelines and/or evidence synthesis (February - March 2023). The topic guide was informed by the MMSR -- focusing on recommendations with mixed methods support, ≥3 supporting studies, and those prioritised by an expert advisory group through a pragmatic prioritisation exercise using the MoSCoW method (Must, Should, Could, and Will not haves). Focus groups were recorded and transcripts were analysed using a directed content analysis. RESULTS: Participants suggested a “less-is-more” structured approach that minimises methodological steps and statistical data, promoting accessibility to all audiences by judicious use of links to the full technical report. They emphasized the importance of concise consistently-presented formats which emphasize key messages, flag readers to indicators of trust in the producers (i.e., logos, websites, and conflict of interest statements), and highlight the quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Project findings are informing the creation of accessible and actionable guidance on best-practices for creating summary formats. Next steps involve user-testing prototype formats through semi-structured interviews which will then be integrated into the National Clinical Guideline development process in Ireland. KEY MESSAGES: • Co-design workshops delineated key aspects of effective and acceptable evidence synthesis summary formats to help create reproducible format templates for use in clinical guideline development. • Creating summary formats accessible to all guideline development group members will promote better communication and translation of research evidence into recommendations and practice. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595227/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.034 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Murray, R
Lynch, R
O'Neill, M
Smith, S M
Mahtani, K R
Ryan, M
Clyne, B
Sharp, M K
Communicating evidence synthesis: co-designing summary formats with end users
title Communicating evidence synthesis: co-designing summary formats with end users
title_full Communicating evidence synthesis: co-designing summary formats with end users
title_fullStr Communicating evidence synthesis: co-designing summary formats with end users
title_full_unstemmed Communicating evidence synthesis: co-designing summary formats with end users
title_short Communicating evidence synthesis: co-designing summary formats with end users
title_sort communicating evidence synthesis: co-designing summary formats with end users
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595227/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.034
work_keys_str_mv AT murrayr communicatingevidencesynthesiscodesigningsummaryformatswithendusers
AT lynchr communicatingevidencesynthesiscodesigningsummaryformatswithendusers
AT oneillm communicatingevidencesynthesiscodesigningsummaryformatswithendusers
AT smithsm communicatingevidencesynthesiscodesigningsummaryformatswithendusers
AT mahtanikr communicatingevidencesynthesiscodesigningsummaryformatswithendusers
AT ryanm communicatingevidencesynthesiscodesigningsummaryformatswithendusers
AT clyneb communicatingevidencesynthesiscodesigningsummaryformatswithendusers
AT sharpmk communicatingevidencesynthesiscodesigningsummaryformatswithendusers