Cargando…

Medical students’ vaccine hesitancy, knowledge and attitudes: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Despite physicians being in a unique position to address concerns about vaccine hesitancy (VH), there are hesitant and concerned physicians about vaccination safety and utility. This study aimed to investigate medical students’ knowledge, VH and their association: besides students’ attit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giustolisi, F, Modica Fiascaro, A, Palella, M, Oliveri Conti, G, Ferrante, M, Fiore, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595267/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1437
_version_ 1785124828916744192
author Giustolisi, F
Modica Fiascaro, A
Palella, M
Oliveri Conti, G
Ferrante, M
Fiore, M
author_facet Giustolisi, F
Modica Fiascaro, A
Palella, M
Oliveri Conti, G
Ferrante, M
Fiore, M
author_sort Giustolisi, F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite physicians being in a unique position to address concerns about vaccine hesitancy (VH), there are hesitant and concerned physicians about vaccination safety and utility. This study aimed to investigate medical students’ knowledge, VH and their association: besides students’ attitudes towards vaccines. METHODS: VH, knowledge, and attitudes towards vaccines were collected using an anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha of questionnaire domains was 0.70, 0.80 and 0.78 for VH, knowledge and attitudes, respectively. The opinion answers were added to calculate vaccine Hesitancy Index (HI < 18=low, 19-22=medium, >23=high). RESULTS: Although the frequency of hesitant students decreased from the first to the fifth year, unfortunately a percentage of future doctors with a non-negligible HI level persisted (medium HI level: 31.3%, high HI level 14.9%). We found a negative association between the percentage of students aware of recommended vaccines for healthcare professionals (chickenpox 74.5%vs 57.5%, p = 0.00; measles, mumps, and rubella 92.8%vs83.5%, p = 0.03; meningococcus 79.7%vs 67.7%, p = 0.00) and HI (low vs high). Furthermore, we found a positive association between the frequency of students who had not been vaccinated (varicella 2.3%vs3.9%, p = 0.00) or who did not know if they were (varicella 8.2%vs22.8%, p = 0.00; Hepatitis B 11.4%vs20.5%, p = 0.02; Tdap 4.6%vs15.0%, p = 0.00) and HI (low vs high). Overall, the reason for not getting vaccinated given by most students was ‘I didn't have time’ (flu: 60.8%vs66.9%) showing a positive association with HI. Conversely, a negative association was found with the reason ‘The vaccine is not free’ (flu 71.4%vs0.0%) that is higher HI corresponded to less vaccine knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Actions are needed in the future on the education of medical students as well as on the role they perceive themselves to have in responding to patient hesitation, and on their level of confidence in doing so. KEY MESSAGES: • Physicians are in the best position to understand hesitance patients, to respond to their worries and concern, and to find ways of explaining to them the benefit of vaccination. • Widespread and interdisciplinary training on vaccine hesitancy, risk communication, infodemiology and community engagement are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105952672023-10-25 Medical students’ vaccine hesitancy, knowledge and attitudes: A cross-sectional study Giustolisi, F Modica Fiascaro, A Palella, M Oliveri Conti, G Ferrante, M Fiore, M Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Despite physicians being in a unique position to address concerns about vaccine hesitancy (VH), there are hesitant and concerned physicians about vaccination safety and utility. This study aimed to investigate medical students’ knowledge, VH and their association: besides students’ attitudes towards vaccines. METHODS: VH, knowledge, and attitudes towards vaccines were collected using an anonymous self-administered questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha of questionnaire domains was 0.70, 0.80 and 0.78 for VH, knowledge and attitudes, respectively. The opinion answers were added to calculate vaccine Hesitancy Index (HI < 18=low, 19-22=medium, >23=high). RESULTS: Although the frequency of hesitant students decreased from the first to the fifth year, unfortunately a percentage of future doctors with a non-negligible HI level persisted (medium HI level: 31.3%, high HI level 14.9%). We found a negative association between the percentage of students aware of recommended vaccines for healthcare professionals (chickenpox 74.5%vs 57.5%, p = 0.00; measles, mumps, and rubella 92.8%vs83.5%, p = 0.03; meningococcus 79.7%vs 67.7%, p = 0.00) and HI (low vs high). Furthermore, we found a positive association between the frequency of students who had not been vaccinated (varicella 2.3%vs3.9%, p = 0.00) or who did not know if they were (varicella 8.2%vs22.8%, p = 0.00; Hepatitis B 11.4%vs20.5%, p = 0.02; Tdap 4.6%vs15.0%, p = 0.00) and HI (low vs high). Overall, the reason for not getting vaccinated given by most students was ‘I didn't have time’ (flu: 60.8%vs66.9%) showing a positive association with HI. Conversely, a negative association was found with the reason ‘The vaccine is not free’ (flu 71.4%vs0.0%) that is higher HI corresponded to less vaccine knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Actions are needed in the future on the education of medical students as well as on the role they perceive themselves to have in responding to patient hesitation, and on their level of confidence in doing so. KEY MESSAGES: • Physicians are in the best position to understand hesitance patients, to respond to their worries and concern, and to find ways of explaining to them the benefit of vaccination. • Widespread and interdisciplinary training on vaccine hesitancy, risk communication, infodemiology and community engagement are needed. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595267/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1437 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Giustolisi, F
Modica Fiascaro, A
Palella, M
Oliveri Conti, G
Ferrante, M
Fiore, M
Medical students’ vaccine hesitancy, knowledge and attitudes: A cross-sectional study
title Medical students’ vaccine hesitancy, knowledge and attitudes: A cross-sectional study
title_full Medical students’ vaccine hesitancy, knowledge and attitudes: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Medical students’ vaccine hesitancy, knowledge and attitudes: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Medical students’ vaccine hesitancy, knowledge and attitudes: A cross-sectional study
title_short Medical students’ vaccine hesitancy, knowledge and attitudes: A cross-sectional study
title_sort medical students’ vaccine hesitancy, knowledge and attitudes: a cross-sectional study
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595267/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1437
work_keys_str_mv AT giustolisif medicalstudentsvaccinehesitancyknowledgeandattitudesacrosssectionalstudy
AT modicafiascaroa medicalstudentsvaccinehesitancyknowledgeandattitudesacrosssectionalstudy
AT palellam medicalstudentsvaccinehesitancyknowledgeandattitudesacrosssectionalstudy
AT olivericontig medicalstudentsvaccinehesitancyknowledgeandattitudesacrosssectionalstudy
AT ferrantem medicalstudentsvaccinehesitancyknowledgeandattitudesacrosssectionalstudy
AT fiorem medicalstudentsvaccinehesitancyknowledgeandattitudesacrosssectionalstudy