Cargando…

Translating risk-benefit assessment evidence for policy making: outcomes of an international workshop

BACKGROUND: Transitioning to sustainable, healthy, and inclusive food systems requires a multi-domain risk analysis approach. Integrated methods, such as health risk-benefit assessment (RBA), can support the formulation of coherent regulations by providing comparative information on potential trade-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Matteu Monteiro, C, Membré, J M, Thomsen, S T, Monteiro Pires, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595273/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.964
_version_ 1785124830407819264
author De Matteu Monteiro, C
Membré, J M
Thomsen, S T
Monteiro Pires, S
author_facet De Matteu Monteiro, C
Membré, J M
Thomsen, S T
Monteiro Pires, S
author_sort De Matteu Monteiro, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transitioning to sustainable, healthy, and inclusive food systems requires a multi-domain risk analysis approach. Integrated methods, such as health risk-benefit assessment (RBA), can support the formulation of coherent regulations by providing comparative information on potential trade-offs within the areas of food safety and nutrition. Despite extensive scientific developments and applications, RBAs have not yet been fully adopted by regulatory bodies. Hence, participatory science is needed to identify obstacles for implementation and communication of RBAs to optimize and ensure that generated evidence is compatible to regulatory needs. METHODS: As part of the EU funded project HOLiFOOD, an international workshop held in May 2023 brought together food regulators and other stakeholders from across Europe to identify bottlenecks in the use of RBA outputs in decision-making. The meeting included a key-note presentation, surveys, and group discussions. RESULTS: Thirty-seven participants from 19 institutions based in 13 countries attended the workshop. Obstacles identified were classified into one of the following themes: challenges of using RBAs to inform policymaking, opportunities and needs (e.g., reliability of methods), and communication of RBA outputs. Case studies targeting various foods groups or diets in different contexts is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Health RBA is a multidisciplinary method useful for prioritizing actions and ensuring transparency in decision-making. Case studies addressing the identified obstacles could increase the reliability of RBA methods and favour the adoption by regulatory bodies. Finally, moving towards holistic approaches may require further cross-departmental collaboration and, potentially, organizational changes of authorities in the future. KEY MESSAGES: • Risk-benefit assessment of foods is a robust tool to support public health policymaking. • Engagement with risk managers and other stakeholders is essential to deliver, and effectively translate, fit-for-purpose scientific evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105952732023-10-25 Translating risk-benefit assessment evidence for policy making: outcomes of an international workshop De Matteu Monteiro, C Membré, J M Thomsen, S T Monteiro Pires, S Eur J Public Health Poster Walks BACKGROUND: Transitioning to sustainable, healthy, and inclusive food systems requires a multi-domain risk analysis approach. Integrated methods, such as health risk-benefit assessment (RBA), can support the formulation of coherent regulations by providing comparative information on potential trade-offs within the areas of food safety and nutrition. Despite extensive scientific developments and applications, RBAs have not yet been fully adopted by regulatory bodies. Hence, participatory science is needed to identify obstacles for implementation and communication of RBAs to optimize and ensure that generated evidence is compatible to regulatory needs. METHODS: As part of the EU funded project HOLiFOOD, an international workshop held in May 2023 brought together food regulators and other stakeholders from across Europe to identify bottlenecks in the use of RBA outputs in decision-making. The meeting included a key-note presentation, surveys, and group discussions. RESULTS: Thirty-seven participants from 19 institutions based in 13 countries attended the workshop. Obstacles identified were classified into one of the following themes: challenges of using RBAs to inform policymaking, opportunities and needs (e.g., reliability of methods), and communication of RBA outputs. Case studies targeting various foods groups or diets in different contexts is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Health RBA is a multidisciplinary method useful for prioritizing actions and ensuring transparency in decision-making. Case studies addressing the identified obstacles could increase the reliability of RBA methods and favour the adoption by regulatory bodies. Finally, moving towards holistic approaches may require further cross-departmental collaboration and, potentially, organizational changes of authorities in the future. KEY MESSAGES: • Risk-benefit assessment of foods is a robust tool to support public health policymaking. • Engagement with risk managers and other stakeholders is essential to deliver, and effectively translate, fit-for-purpose scientific evidence. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595273/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.964 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Walks
De Matteu Monteiro, C
Membré, J M
Thomsen, S T
Monteiro Pires, S
Translating risk-benefit assessment evidence for policy making: outcomes of an international workshop
title Translating risk-benefit assessment evidence for policy making: outcomes of an international workshop
title_full Translating risk-benefit assessment evidence for policy making: outcomes of an international workshop
title_fullStr Translating risk-benefit assessment evidence for policy making: outcomes of an international workshop
title_full_unstemmed Translating risk-benefit assessment evidence for policy making: outcomes of an international workshop
title_short Translating risk-benefit assessment evidence for policy making: outcomes of an international workshop
title_sort translating risk-benefit assessment evidence for policy making: outcomes of an international workshop
topic Poster Walks
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595273/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.964
work_keys_str_mv AT dematteumonteiroc translatingriskbenefitassessmentevidenceforpolicymakingoutcomesofaninternationalworkshop
AT membrejm translatingriskbenefitassessmentevidenceforpolicymakingoutcomesofaninternationalworkshop
AT thomsenst translatingriskbenefitassessmentevidenceforpolicymakingoutcomesofaninternationalworkshop
AT monteiropiress translatingriskbenefitassessmentevidenceforpolicymakingoutcomesofaninternationalworkshop