Cargando…

A mixed methods evaluation of a digital antenatal quality improvement intervention in Nepal

BACKGROUND: Quality antenatal care plays an important role in reducing maternal and perinatal mortality. Electronic decision support systems (EDSS) aim to promote adherence to evidence-based practices. The evaluation aimed to assess the effectiveness of the intervention on improving quality of anten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, S, Karmacharya, B, Karki, S, Shakya, R, Shrestha, A, Penn-Kekana, L, Radovich, E, McCarthy, O, Campbell, O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595287/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.869
_version_ 1785124834177449984
author Das, S
Karmacharya, B
Karki, S
Shakya, R
Shrestha, A
Shrestha, A
Penn-Kekana, L
Radovich, E
McCarthy, O
Campbell, O
author_facet Das, S
Karmacharya, B
Karki, S
Shakya, R
Shrestha, A
Shrestha, A
Penn-Kekana, L
Radovich, E
McCarthy, O
Campbell, O
author_sort Das, S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality antenatal care plays an important role in reducing maternal and perinatal mortality. Electronic decision support systems (EDSS) aim to promote adherence to evidence-based practices. The evaluation aimed to assess the effectiveness of the intervention on improving quality of antenatal care (ANC) and understanding of implementation process and intervention effects. METHODS: The study was conducted in primary health care settings in Nepal. Theory of change framework was used for mixed-method evaluation. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected at multiple time points. Data were integrated using concurrent triangulation to develop explanations about the implementation process and the observed effects. RESULTS: Guided by our theory of change, we identified eleven themes that help to understand how the EDSS was used in the real context, and why the EDSS was not much effective in bringing the desired changes that was required to improve quality of ANC. EDSS appear to slightly influence ANC staff behavior, however, training ANC staff in using the EDSS did not necessarily lead to confidence in using it and ANC staff used the EDSS as recordkeeping system. We found mixed evidence on ANC staff believe that the EDSS offers benefits to their work. Inflexibility of EDSS during ANC consultation caused difficulties adapting to women's need and challenging to integrate the EDSS in ANC staffs’ workflow and daily activities. Inadequate linkage of the EDSS with existing health systems impaired the EDSS guided clinical performance. CONCLUSIONS: There is some indication that the EDSS have the potential to increase the quality of care. However, the EDDS alone are not enough to bring the adequate change in ANC staff delivery of quality care. Active participation of government and grassroot level understanding of health system would be essential considering conducting further research taking in account the resources, and other factors that hinders the EDSS utilization. KEY MESSAGES: • Concurrent triangulation helps to understand that digital health intervention is not enough to bring intended changes in the quality-of-service delivery at health facility. • Understanding of context and ground reality is essential to improve the quality of care and enhance the performance of healthcare providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105952872023-10-25 A mixed methods evaluation of a digital antenatal quality improvement intervention in Nepal Das, S Karmacharya, B Karki, S Shakya, R Shrestha, A Shrestha, A Penn-Kekana, L Radovich, E McCarthy, O Campbell, O Eur J Public Health Poster Walks BACKGROUND: Quality antenatal care plays an important role in reducing maternal and perinatal mortality. Electronic decision support systems (EDSS) aim to promote adherence to evidence-based practices. The evaluation aimed to assess the effectiveness of the intervention on improving quality of antenatal care (ANC) and understanding of implementation process and intervention effects. METHODS: The study was conducted in primary health care settings in Nepal. Theory of change framework was used for mixed-method evaluation. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected at multiple time points. Data were integrated using concurrent triangulation to develop explanations about the implementation process and the observed effects. RESULTS: Guided by our theory of change, we identified eleven themes that help to understand how the EDSS was used in the real context, and why the EDSS was not much effective in bringing the desired changes that was required to improve quality of ANC. EDSS appear to slightly influence ANC staff behavior, however, training ANC staff in using the EDSS did not necessarily lead to confidence in using it and ANC staff used the EDSS as recordkeeping system. We found mixed evidence on ANC staff believe that the EDSS offers benefits to their work. Inflexibility of EDSS during ANC consultation caused difficulties adapting to women's need and challenging to integrate the EDSS in ANC staffs’ workflow and daily activities. Inadequate linkage of the EDSS with existing health systems impaired the EDSS guided clinical performance. CONCLUSIONS: There is some indication that the EDSS have the potential to increase the quality of care. However, the EDDS alone are not enough to bring the adequate change in ANC staff delivery of quality care. Active participation of government and grassroot level understanding of health system would be essential considering conducting further research taking in account the resources, and other factors that hinders the EDSS utilization. KEY MESSAGES: • Concurrent triangulation helps to understand that digital health intervention is not enough to bring intended changes in the quality-of-service delivery at health facility. • Understanding of context and ground reality is essential to improve the quality of care and enhance the performance of healthcare providers. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595287/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.869 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Walks
Das, S
Karmacharya, B
Karki, S
Shakya, R
Shrestha, A
Shrestha, A
Penn-Kekana, L
Radovich, E
McCarthy, O
Campbell, O
A mixed methods evaluation of a digital antenatal quality improvement intervention in Nepal
title A mixed methods evaluation of a digital antenatal quality improvement intervention in Nepal
title_full A mixed methods evaluation of a digital antenatal quality improvement intervention in Nepal
title_fullStr A mixed methods evaluation of a digital antenatal quality improvement intervention in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed A mixed methods evaluation of a digital antenatal quality improvement intervention in Nepal
title_short A mixed methods evaluation of a digital antenatal quality improvement intervention in Nepal
title_sort mixed methods evaluation of a digital antenatal quality improvement intervention in nepal
topic Poster Walks
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595287/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.869
work_keys_str_mv AT dass amixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT karmacharyab amixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT karkis amixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT shakyar amixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT shresthaa amixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT shresthaa amixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT pennkekanal amixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT radoviche amixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT mccarthyo amixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT campbello amixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT dass mixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT karmacharyab mixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT karkis mixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT shakyar mixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT shresthaa mixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT shresthaa mixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT pennkekanal mixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT radoviche mixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT mccarthyo mixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal
AT campbello mixedmethodsevaluationofadigitalantenatalqualityimprovementinterventioninnepal