Cargando…
Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis
In animal production, the rational use of antimicrobials has been promoted to decrease antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in microorganisms. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to reduce/adequate antimicrobial use and decrease AMR. Articles were identified in PubMed, Scop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595299/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.082 |
_version_ | 1785124836989730816 |
---|---|
author | Costa, M M Cardo, M Ruano, Z Alho, A M Dinis-Teixeira, J Aguiar, P Leite, A |
author_facet | Costa, M M Cardo, M Ruano, Z Alho, A M Dinis-Teixeira, J Aguiar, P Leite, A |
author_sort | Costa, M M |
collection | PubMed |
description | In animal production, the rational use of antimicrobials has been promoted to decrease antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in microorganisms. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to reduce/adequate antimicrobial use and decrease AMR. Articles were identified in PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and grey literature in DANS EASY, WorldCat, RCAAP. Eligible studies included original studies, assessing broiler/pig populations, antimicrobial interventions, comparator with standard/no use of antimicrobials, outcomes related to AMR, farm level and analytical observational studies. Meta-analysis was conducted for combinations including type of intervention, bacterial species, production type, population. Interventions effectiveness was estimated using odds ratio of resistance to antimicrobial substances/classes by bacteria and populations with and without intervention. A total of 46 studies were eligible. For broilers, restrictions were all non-therapeutic use (46%), complete restriction (27%), prohibition on antimicrobials used for growth promotion (23%). For pigs, restrictions included: all non-therapeutic use (37%), complete restriction (37%), group treatments (22%). For meta-analysis (21 studies), combinations indicated a protective effect for most antimicrobial classes in E. coli, Campylobacter and Enterococcus and broilers, and Escherichia coli and Campylobacter and pigs, compared to conventional production or without intervention. An increased odds of resistance were observed for cephalosporins in E. coli and broilers raised without antimicrobials, and to fluoroquinolones/quinolones in Campylobacter and pigs raised without antimicrobials, compared to conventional production. Our study revealed that organic, antimicrobial-free farms and group treatment restrictions in conventional production were mostly associated with AMR reduction, providing information on available options that may support decision-making to tackle AMR. KEY MESSAGES: • Organic/antimicrobial-free farms indicated a protective effect on resistance to most antimicrobials. • Fluoroquinolones resistant Campylobacter may persist in pigs raised without antimicrobials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10595299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105952992023-10-25 Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis Costa, M M Cardo, M Ruano, Z Alho, A M Dinis-Teixeira, J Aguiar, P Leite, A Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme In animal production, the rational use of antimicrobials has been promoted to decrease antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in microorganisms. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to reduce/adequate antimicrobial use and decrease AMR. Articles were identified in PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and grey literature in DANS EASY, WorldCat, RCAAP. Eligible studies included original studies, assessing broiler/pig populations, antimicrobial interventions, comparator with standard/no use of antimicrobials, outcomes related to AMR, farm level and analytical observational studies. Meta-analysis was conducted for combinations including type of intervention, bacterial species, production type, population. Interventions effectiveness was estimated using odds ratio of resistance to antimicrobial substances/classes by bacteria and populations with and without intervention. A total of 46 studies were eligible. For broilers, restrictions were all non-therapeutic use (46%), complete restriction (27%), prohibition on antimicrobials used for growth promotion (23%). For pigs, restrictions included: all non-therapeutic use (37%), complete restriction (37%), group treatments (22%). For meta-analysis (21 studies), combinations indicated a protective effect for most antimicrobial classes in E. coli, Campylobacter and Enterococcus and broilers, and Escherichia coli and Campylobacter and pigs, compared to conventional production or without intervention. An increased odds of resistance were observed for cephalosporins in E. coli and broilers raised without antimicrobials, and to fluoroquinolones/quinolones in Campylobacter and pigs raised without antimicrobials, compared to conventional production. Our study revealed that organic, antimicrobial-free farms and group treatment restrictions in conventional production were mostly associated with AMR reduction, providing information on available options that may support decision-making to tackle AMR. KEY MESSAGES: • Organic/antimicrobial-free farms indicated a protective effect on resistance to most antimicrobials. • Fluoroquinolones resistant Campylobacter may persist in pigs raised without antimicrobials. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595299/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.082 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Parallel Programme Costa, M M Cardo, M Ruano, Z Alho, A M Dinis-Teixeira, J Aguiar, P Leite, A Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis |
title | Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis |
topic | Parallel Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595299/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT costamm effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis AT cardom effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis AT ruanoz effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis AT alhoam effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis AT dinisteixeiraj effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis AT aguiarp effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis AT leitea effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis |