Cargando…

Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis

In animal production, the rational use of antimicrobials has been promoted to decrease antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in microorganisms. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to reduce/adequate antimicrobial use and decrease AMR. Articles were identified in PubMed, Scop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costa, M M, Cardo, M, Ruano, Z, Alho, A M, Dinis-Teixeira, J, Aguiar, P, Leite, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595299/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.082
_version_ 1785124836989730816
author Costa, M M
Cardo, M
Ruano, Z
Alho, A M
Dinis-Teixeira, J
Aguiar, P
Leite, A
author_facet Costa, M M
Cardo, M
Ruano, Z
Alho, A M
Dinis-Teixeira, J
Aguiar, P
Leite, A
author_sort Costa, M M
collection PubMed
description In animal production, the rational use of antimicrobials has been promoted to decrease antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in microorganisms. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to reduce/adequate antimicrobial use and decrease AMR. Articles were identified in PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and grey literature in DANS EASY, WorldCat, RCAAP. Eligible studies included original studies, assessing broiler/pig populations, antimicrobial interventions, comparator with standard/no use of antimicrobials, outcomes related to AMR, farm level and analytical observational studies. Meta-analysis was conducted for combinations including type of intervention, bacterial species, production type, population. Interventions effectiveness was estimated using odds ratio of resistance to antimicrobial substances/classes by bacteria and populations with and without intervention. A total of 46 studies were eligible. For broilers, restrictions were all non-therapeutic use (46%), complete restriction (27%), prohibition on antimicrobials used for growth promotion (23%). For pigs, restrictions included: all non-therapeutic use (37%), complete restriction (37%), group treatments (22%). For meta-analysis (21 studies), combinations indicated a protective effect for most antimicrobial classes in E. coli, Campylobacter and Enterococcus and broilers, and Escherichia coli and Campylobacter and pigs, compared to conventional production or without intervention. An increased odds of resistance were observed for cephalosporins in E. coli and broilers raised without antimicrobials, and to fluoroquinolones/quinolones in Campylobacter and pigs raised without antimicrobials, compared to conventional production. Our study revealed that organic, antimicrobial-free farms and group treatment restrictions in conventional production were mostly associated with AMR reduction, providing information on available options that may support decision-making to tackle AMR. KEY MESSAGES: • Organic/antimicrobial-free farms indicated a protective effect on resistance to most antimicrobials. • Fluoroquinolones resistant Campylobacter may persist in pigs raised without antimicrobials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105952992023-10-25 Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis Costa, M M Cardo, M Ruano, Z Alho, A M Dinis-Teixeira, J Aguiar, P Leite, A Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme In animal production, the rational use of antimicrobials has been promoted to decrease antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in microorganisms. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to reduce/adequate antimicrobial use and decrease AMR. Articles were identified in PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and grey literature in DANS EASY, WorldCat, RCAAP. Eligible studies included original studies, assessing broiler/pig populations, antimicrobial interventions, comparator with standard/no use of antimicrobials, outcomes related to AMR, farm level and analytical observational studies. Meta-analysis was conducted for combinations including type of intervention, bacterial species, production type, population. Interventions effectiveness was estimated using odds ratio of resistance to antimicrobial substances/classes by bacteria and populations with and without intervention. A total of 46 studies were eligible. For broilers, restrictions were all non-therapeutic use (46%), complete restriction (27%), prohibition on antimicrobials used for growth promotion (23%). For pigs, restrictions included: all non-therapeutic use (37%), complete restriction (37%), group treatments (22%). For meta-analysis (21 studies), combinations indicated a protective effect for most antimicrobial classes in E. coli, Campylobacter and Enterococcus and broilers, and Escherichia coli and Campylobacter and pigs, compared to conventional production or without intervention. An increased odds of resistance were observed for cephalosporins in E. coli and broilers raised without antimicrobials, and to fluoroquinolones/quinolones in Campylobacter and pigs raised without antimicrobials, compared to conventional production. Our study revealed that organic, antimicrobial-free farms and group treatment restrictions in conventional production were mostly associated with AMR reduction, providing information on available options that may support decision-making to tackle AMR. KEY MESSAGES: • Organic/antimicrobial-free farms indicated a protective effect on resistance to most antimicrobials. • Fluoroquinolones resistant Campylobacter may persist in pigs raised without antimicrobials. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595299/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.082 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Costa, M M
Cardo, M
Ruano, Z
Alho, A M
Dinis-Teixeira, J
Aguiar, P
Leite, A
Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis
title Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of antimicrobial interventions in animal production: systematic review & meta-analysis
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595299/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.082
work_keys_str_mv AT costamm effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis
AT cardom effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis
AT ruanoz effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis
AT alhoam effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis
AT dinisteixeiraj effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis
AT aguiarp effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis
AT leitea effectivenessofantimicrobialinterventionsinanimalproductionsystematicreviewmetaanalysis