Cargando…

Evaluation of family physicians’ attitude towards primary healthcare consultations

BACKGROUND: The quality of services in the health care system is very important for both patients’ health and health care providers. In the past decade, good service ratings from the patient's perspective have become crucial in evaluating the work of medical professionals and health care instit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jasiukaitiene, V, Venckute, I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595355/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1355
_version_ 1785124850808913920
author Jasiukaitiene, V
Venckute, I
author_facet Jasiukaitiene, V
Venckute, I
author_sort Jasiukaitiene, V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quality of services in the health care system is very important for both patients’ health and health care providers. In the past decade, good service ratings from the patient's perspective have become crucial in evaluating the work of medical professionals and health care institutions. However, it is also important to consider the opinions of health care specialists, especially when it comes to medical consultation, which is one of the most important components of primary health care (PHC) chain. AIM: To evaluate the attitude of family physicians (FP) towards consultations provided in PHC. METHODS: The study was conducted in 2022. December - 2023 in February. The research contingent is FP of Lithuania. Research method - quantitative momentary research, anonymous questionnaire survey, 206 subjects were interviewed. Calculated chi-square (χ2) and z-criterion. RESULTS: The majority of FP indicated that they involve the patient in the decision-making process (68.0%), those working in private institutions said so more often than those working in public institutions (p < 0.05). 89.3% of the subjects stated that the consultation time with the patient is not enough, and 70.4% respondents receive many unregistered patient visits per day. E-health makes it difficult for 81.1%, 86.4% of the respondents indicated that there is too much of a workload and this was mostly said by respondents working in public institutions (p < 0.05). Remote consultations facilitate the workflow (76.2%). The older age of the respondents and greater work experience lead to lower self-confidence during remote consultation, longer consultation time and less belief in the benefits of remote consultation (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Most FP positively evaluate the consultation they provide, but they also said that the consultation time is insufficient, they must consult a number of unregistered patients, e-health complicates the work. Remote consultations facilitate the workflow. KEY MESSAGES: • The consultation time is insufficient. • Remote consultations facilitate the workflow.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105953552023-10-25 Evaluation of family physicians’ attitude towards primary healthcare consultations Jasiukaitiene, V Venckute, I Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: The quality of services in the health care system is very important for both patients’ health and health care providers. In the past decade, good service ratings from the patient's perspective have become crucial in evaluating the work of medical professionals and health care institutions. However, it is also important to consider the opinions of health care specialists, especially when it comes to medical consultation, which is one of the most important components of primary health care (PHC) chain. AIM: To evaluate the attitude of family physicians (FP) towards consultations provided in PHC. METHODS: The study was conducted in 2022. December - 2023 in February. The research contingent is FP of Lithuania. Research method - quantitative momentary research, anonymous questionnaire survey, 206 subjects were interviewed. Calculated chi-square (χ2) and z-criterion. RESULTS: The majority of FP indicated that they involve the patient in the decision-making process (68.0%), those working in private institutions said so more often than those working in public institutions (p < 0.05). 89.3% of the subjects stated that the consultation time with the patient is not enough, and 70.4% respondents receive many unregistered patient visits per day. E-health makes it difficult for 81.1%, 86.4% of the respondents indicated that there is too much of a workload and this was mostly said by respondents working in public institutions (p < 0.05). Remote consultations facilitate the workflow (76.2%). The older age of the respondents and greater work experience lead to lower self-confidence during remote consultation, longer consultation time and less belief in the benefits of remote consultation (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Most FP positively evaluate the consultation they provide, but they also said that the consultation time is insufficient, they must consult a number of unregistered patients, e-health complicates the work. Remote consultations facilitate the workflow. KEY MESSAGES: • The consultation time is insufficient. • Remote consultations facilitate the workflow. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595355/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1355 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Jasiukaitiene, V
Venckute, I
Evaluation of family physicians’ attitude towards primary healthcare consultations
title Evaluation of family physicians’ attitude towards primary healthcare consultations
title_full Evaluation of family physicians’ attitude towards primary healthcare consultations
title_fullStr Evaluation of family physicians’ attitude towards primary healthcare consultations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of family physicians’ attitude towards primary healthcare consultations
title_short Evaluation of family physicians’ attitude towards primary healthcare consultations
title_sort evaluation of family physicians’ attitude towards primary healthcare consultations
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595355/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1355
work_keys_str_mv AT jasiukaitienev evaluationoffamilyphysiciansattitudetowardsprimaryhealthcareconsultations
AT venckutei evaluationoffamilyphysiciansattitudetowardsprimaryhealthcareconsultations