Cargando…

Feasibility, acceptability & preliminary efficacy of a digital preconception intervention: OptimalMe

BACKGROUND: Women's health prior to pregnancy is an increasing area of public health focus. Lifestyle interventions in preconception may be an ideal to target lifestyle behaviours that impact preconception and pregnancy health. However, there are limited interventions initiated prior to pregnan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brammall, B R, Garad, R M, Teede, H J, Harrison, C L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595368/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1225
_version_ 1785124853847687168
author Brammall, B R
Garad, R M
Teede, H J
Harrison, C L
author_facet Brammall, B R
Garad, R M
Teede, H J
Harrison, C L
author_sort Brammall, B R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women's health prior to pregnancy is an increasing area of public health focus. Lifestyle interventions in preconception may be an ideal to target lifestyle behaviours that impact preconception and pregnancy health. However, there are limited interventions initiated prior to pregnancy. This study assesses the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a digital healthy lifestyle behaviours intervention in women planning a pregnancy. METHODS: Participants were provided digital health and lifestyle information, health checklist, goal setting tools and virtual health coaching (telephone or video conference). Feasibility was defined as 1) recruitment of eligible participants who expressed interest, 2) retention from baseline through delivery (attending both preconception coaching sessions), and 3) adherence, based on attending one health coaching session, using the digital goal setting tool and accessing at least one information article. Acceptability was based on program components evaluated as helpful/very helpful. Preliminary intervention efficacy was based on participants attending a preconception consultation with a genera l practitioner (GP). RESULTS: Women (n = 298) planning a pregnancy within 12 months were recruited. Feasibility objectives were met, with 60% (n = 298/494) recruitment, 76% (n = 227/298) retention and 85% (n = 252/298) adherence. Evaluation demonstrated high levels of acceptability: digital module (95% n = 205/216), physical activity/diet information (90% n = 195/216), preconception health information (91% n = 195/215), coaching (92% n = 198/216), lifestyle SMSs (72% n = 153/213) and self-weighing (74% n = 159/215). Since the intervention, 73% (n = 159/217) had visited their GP in preparation for pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The OptimalMe preconception intervention demonstrated feasibility, high acceptability and efficacy in women planning a pregnancy. This supports future digital health interventions in preconception; pregnancy results pending. KEY MESSAGES: • Interventions prior to pregnancy are limited, yet women’s health prior to pregnancy is an increasing area of public health focus. • Digital health interventions are feasible and acceptable for preconception health and lifestyle health promotion for women planning a pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595368
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105953682023-10-25 Feasibility, acceptability & preliminary efficacy of a digital preconception intervention: OptimalMe Brammall, B R Garad, R M Teede, H J Harrison, C L Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Women's health prior to pregnancy is an increasing area of public health focus. Lifestyle interventions in preconception may be an ideal to target lifestyle behaviours that impact preconception and pregnancy health. However, there are limited interventions initiated prior to pregnancy. This study assesses the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a digital healthy lifestyle behaviours intervention in women planning a pregnancy. METHODS: Participants were provided digital health and lifestyle information, health checklist, goal setting tools and virtual health coaching (telephone or video conference). Feasibility was defined as 1) recruitment of eligible participants who expressed interest, 2) retention from baseline through delivery (attending both preconception coaching sessions), and 3) adherence, based on attending one health coaching session, using the digital goal setting tool and accessing at least one information article. Acceptability was based on program components evaluated as helpful/very helpful. Preliminary intervention efficacy was based on participants attending a preconception consultation with a genera l practitioner (GP). RESULTS: Women (n = 298) planning a pregnancy within 12 months were recruited. Feasibility objectives were met, with 60% (n = 298/494) recruitment, 76% (n = 227/298) retention and 85% (n = 252/298) adherence. Evaluation demonstrated high levels of acceptability: digital module (95% n = 205/216), physical activity/diet information (90% n = 195/216), preconception health information (91% n = 195/215), coaching (92% n = 198/216), lifestyle SMSs (72% n = 153/213) and self-weighing (74% n = 159/215). Since the intervention, 73% (n = 159/217) had visited their GP in preparation for pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The OptimalMe preconception intervention demonstrated feasibility, high acceptability and efficacy in women planning a pregnancy. This supports future digital health interventions in preconception; pregnancy results pending. KEY MESSAGES: • Interventions prior to pregnancy are limited, yet women’s health prior to pregnancy is an increasing area of public health focus. • Digital health interventions are feasible and acceptable for preconception health and lifestyle health promotion for women planning a pregnancy. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595368/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1225 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Brammall, B R
Garad, R M
Teede, H J
Harrison, C L
Feasibility, acceptability & preliminary efficacy of a digital preconception intervention: OptimalMe
title Feasibility, acceptability & preliminary efficacy of a digital preconception intervention: OptimalMe
title_full Feasibility, acceptability & preliminary efficacy of a digital preconception intervention: OptimalMe
title_fullStr Feasibility, acceptability & preliminary efficacy of a digital preconception intervention: OptimalMe
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility, acceptability & preliminary efficacy of a digital preconception intervention: OptimalMe
title_short Feasibility, acceptability & preliminary efficacy of a digital preconception intervention: OptimalMe
title_sort feasibility, acceptability & preliminary efficacy of a digital preconception intervention: optimalme
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595368/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1225
work_keys_str_mv AT brammallbr feasibilityacceptabilitypreliminaryefficacyofadigitalpreconceptioninterventionoptimalme
AT garadrm feasibilityacceptabilitypreliminaryefficacyofadigitalpreconceptioninterventionoptimalme
AT teedehj feasibilityacceptabilitypreliminaryefficacyofadigitalpreconceptioninterventionoptimalme
AT harrisoncl feasibilityacceptabilitypreliminaryefficacyofadigitalpreconceptioninterventionoptimalme