Cargando…

The effect of gel pads on the measurement of breast superficial lesions by shear wave elastography

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the repeatability and diagnostic efficiency of shear wave elastography (SWE) while using coupling gel and gel pads in the diagnosis of superficial breast lesions. METHODS: Two experienced sonographers, trained in SWE, used different methods to perform the maxim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zhijun, He, Shu, Zhong, Yu, Zou, Hairong, Cai, Lu, Zhang, Yan, Wang, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37871181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2269941
_version_ 1785124855945887744
author Zhang, Zhijun
He, Shu
Zhong, Yu
Zou, Hairong
Cai, Lu
Zhang, Yan
Wang, Hui
author_facet Zhang, Zhijun
He, Shu
Zhong, Yu
Zou, Hairong
Cai, Lu
Zhang, Yan
Wang, Hui
author_sort Zhang, Zhijun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the repeatability and diagnostic efficiency of shear wave elastography (SWE) while using coupling gel and gel pads in the diagnosis of superficial breast lesions. METHODS: Two experienced sonographers, trained in SWE, used different methods to perform the maximum Young’s modulus (Emax) measurement of the lesion while using coupling gel SWE and gel pad SWE at different time points. All 80 lesions were in the superficial layer of the breast. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver repeatability. Meanwhile, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of the two methods. RESULTS: In the 80 breast lesions, the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of SWE measurements using coupling gel were considered good, and the ICCs were 0.728 (95% CI: 0.509–0.813) and 0.702 (95% CI: 0.492–0.795), respectively. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the SWE measured by the gel pad were also considered good, and the ICCs were 0.745 (95% CI: 0.501–0.801) and 0.713 (95% CI: 0.498–0.802), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve were 0.711 and 0.737, 0.929 and 0.905, and 0.873 and 0.878, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the SWE measurement of superficial breast lesions, the use of a gel pad does not affect the repeatability and diagnostic efficiency of the measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105953772023-10-25 The effect of gel pads on the measurement of breast superficial lesions by shear wave elastography Zhang, Zhijun He, Shu Zhong, Yu Zou, Hairong Cai, Lu Zhang, Yan Wang, Hui Ann Med Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the repeatability and diagnostic efficiency of shear wave elastography (SWE) while using coupling gel and gel pads in the diagnosis of superficial breast lesions. METHODS: Two experienced sonographers, trained in SWE, used different methods to perform the maximum Young’s modulus (Emax) measurement of the lesion while using coupling gel SWE and gel pad SWE at different time points. All 80 lesions were in the superficial layer of the breast. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver repeatability. Meanwhile, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve of the two methods. RESULTS: In the 80 breast lesions, the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of SWE measurements using coupling gel were considered good, and the ICCs were 0.728 (95% CI: 0.509–0.813) and 0.702 (95% CI: 0.492–0.795), respectively. The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the SWE measured by the gel pad were also considered good, and the ICCs were 0.745 (95% CI: 0.501–0.801) and 0.713 (95% CI: 0.498–0.802), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve were 0.711 and 0.737, 0.929 and 0.905, and 0.873 and 0.878, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In the SWE measurement of superficial breast lesions, the use of a gel pad does not affect the repeatability and diagnostic efficiency of the measurement. Taylor & Francis 2023-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10595377/ /pubmed/37871181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2269941 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhang, Zhijun
He, Shu
Zhong, Yu
Zou, Hairong
Cai, Lu
Zhang, Yan
Wang, Hui
The effect of gel pads on the measurement of breast superficial lesions by shear wave elastography
title The effect of gel pads on the measurement of breast superficial lesions by shear wave elastography
title_full The effect of gel pads on the measurement of breast superficial lesions by shear wave elastography
title_fullStr The effect of gel pads on the measurement of breast superficial lesions by shear wave elastography
title_full_unstemmed The effect of gel pads on the measurement of breast superficial lesions by shear wave elastography
title_short The effect of gel pads on the measurement of breast superficial lesions by shear wave elastography
title_sort effect of gel pads on the measurement of breast superficial lesions by shear wave elastography
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37871181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2269941
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzhijun theeffectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT heshu theeffectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT zhongyu theeffectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT zouhairong theeffectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT cailu theeffectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT zhangyan theeffectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT wanghui theeffectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT zhangzhijun effectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT heshu effectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT zhongyu effectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT zouhairong effectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT cailu effectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT zhangyan effectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography
AT wanghui effectofgelpadsonthemeasurementofbreastsuperficiallesionsbyshearwaveelastography