Cargando…

Factors influencing engagement in advance care planning in the community: A mixed-research synthesis

BACKGROUND: The development of innovative Advance Care Planning (ACP) health behaviour change interventions for adults (≥50 years old) in the community should be informed by a findings synthesis. The objectives of this review were to (a) identify stakeholders' perspectives on facilitators and b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pilch, M, Cooper Lunt, V, Hickey, A, Thomas, S, Hayes, C, Kaminiecki, B, Korpak, J, Mockler, D, Doyle, F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595424/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1011
_version_ 1785124867191865344
author Pilch, M
Cooper Lunt, V
Hickey, A
Thomas, S
Hayes, C
Kaminiecki, B
Korpak, J
Mockler, D
Doyle, F
author_facet Pilch, M
Cooper Lunt, V
Hickey, A
Thomas, S
Hayes, C
Kaminiecki, B
Korpak, J
Mockler, D
Doyle, F
author_sort Pilch, M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of innovative Advance Care Planning (ACP) health behaviour change interventions for adults (≥50 years old) in the community should be informed by a findings synthesis. The objectives of this review were to (a) identify stakeholders' perspectives on facilitators and barriers to ACP behaviours and (b) map these factors across the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation dimensions of behaviour (COM-B model). METHODS: This hybrid mixed-research synthesis followed a published protocol. Content analysis was applied to the results sections of the included studies. Data transformation and triangulation processes underpinned findings integration (4,5). RESULTS: The review included 117 records and studies recruited patients (62%), service providers (29%), and trusted others (9%). ACP behaviours were ACP as a general concept, (41%), communication (28.7%), documentation (22%), decision-making (5.3%), or surrogate appointment (3%). Ten categories of influencing factors were identified, ranked according to frequency of reporting. They included Connectedness, Psychological Factors, Metapreferences, Service Provision, Temporality, Sociodemographic Characteristics, Literacy, Resources, Experience, and Macro-Level Factors. Their sub-categories (52 in total) were mapped across the COM-B model. The most frequently reported Motivation sub-categories were Comfort and Readiness (n = 78), Actors and Roles Requirements (n = 56), and Perceptions and Beliefs (n = 45). The Opportunity dimension included Communication and Understanding (n = 43), Effect of the Other (n = 42), and Involvement and Collaboration (n = 41). The top Capability sub-category was ACP literacy (n = 43). DISCUSSION: The triangulation of stakeholders' perspectives facilitated identification a complex array of factors influencing ACP behaviours. Their mapping across the COM-B model informed future research, policy, and ACP intervention development. KEY MESSAGES: • Stakeholders’ engagement in ACP behaviours is influenced by a complex array of factors, with the majority of them falling into the categories of motivation and opportunity. • Future ACP interventions design need to build on this learning and develop strategies and policies that support meaningful stakeholders’ engagement in ACP activities, including their collaboration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105954242023-10-25 Factors influencing engagement in advance care planning in the community: A mixed-research synthesis Pilch, M Cooper Lunt, V Hickey, A Thomas, S Hayes, C Kaminiecki, B Korpak, J Mockler, D Doyle, F Eur J Public Health Poster Walks BACKGROUND: The development of innovative Advance Care Planning (ACP) health behaviour change interventions for adults (≥50 years old) in the community should be informed by a findings synthesis. The objectives of this review were to (a) identify stakeholders' perspectives on facilitators and barriers to ACP behaviours and (b) map these factors across the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation dimensions of behaviour (COM-B model). METHODS: This hybrid mixed-research synthesis followed a published protocol. Content analysis was applied to the results sections of the included studies. Data transformation and triangulation processes underpinned findings integration (4,5). RESULTS: The review included 117 records and studies recruited patients (62%), service providers (29%), and trusted others (9%). ACP behaviours were ACP as a general concept, (41%), communication (28.7%), documentation (22%), decision-making (5.3%), or surrogate appointment (3%). Ten categories of influencing factors were identified, ranked according to frequency of reporting. They included Connectedness, Psychological Factors, Metapreferences, Service Provision, Temporality, Sociodemographic Characteristics, Literacy, Resources, Experience, and Macro-Level Factors. Their sub-categories (52 in total) were mapped across the COM-B model. The most frequently reported Motivation sub-categories were Comfort and Readiness (n = 78), Actors and Roles Requirements (n = 56), and Perceptions and Beliefs (n = 45). The Opportunity dimension included Communication and Understanding (n = 43), Effect of the Other (n = 42), and Involvement and Collaboration (n = 41). The top Capability sub-category was ACP literacy (n = 43). DISCUSSION: The triangulation of stakeholders' perspectives facilitated identification a complex array of factors influencing ACP behaviours. Their mapping across the COM-B model informed future research, policy, and ACP intervention development. KEY MESSAGES: • Stakeholders’ engagement in ACP behaviours is influenced by a complex array of factors, with the majority of them falling into the categories of motivation and opportunity. • Future ACP interventions design need to build on this learning and develop strategies and policies that support meaningful stakeholders’ engagement in ACP activities, including their collaboration. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595424/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1011 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Walks
Pilch, M
Cooper Lunt, V
Hickey, A
Thomas, S
Hayes, C
Kaminiecki, B
Korpak, J
Mockler, D
Doyle, F
Factors influencing engagement in advance care planning in the community: A mixed-research synthesis
title Factors influencing engagement in advance care planning in the community: A mixed-research synthesis
title_full Factors influencing engagement in advance care planning in the community: A mixed-research synthesis
title_fullStr Factors influencing engagement in advance care planning in the community: A mixed-research synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing engagement in advance care planning in the community: A mixed-research synthesis
title_short Factors influencing engagement in advance care planning in the community: A mixed-research synthesis
title_sort factors influencing engagement in advance care planning in the community: a mixed-research synthesis
topic Poster Walks
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595424/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1011
work_keys_str_mv AT pilchm factorsinfluencingengagementinadvancecareplanninginthecommunityamixedresearchsynthesis
AT cooperluntv factorsinfluencingengagementinadvancecareplanninginthecommunityamixedresearchsynthesis
AT hickeya factorsinfluencingengagementinadvancecareplanninginthecommunityamixedresearchsynthesis
AT thomass factorsinfluencingengagementinadvancecareplanninginthecommunityamixedresearchsynthesis
AT hayesc factorsinfluencingengagementinadvancecareplanninginthecommunityamixedresearchsynthesis
AT kaminieckib factorsinfluencingengagementinadvancecareplanninginthecommunityamixedresearchsynthesis
AT korpakj factorsinfluencingengagementinadvancecareplanninginthecommunityamixedresearchsynthesis
AT mocklerd factorsinfluencingengagementinadvancecareplanninginthecommunityamixedresearchsynthesis
AT doylef factorsinfluencingengagementinadvancecareplanninginthecommunityamixedresearchsynthesis