Cargando…
Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria
ISSUE/PROBLEM: In 2017, Austria started the establishment of multi-professional primary health care units (PCUs) to better meet patients’ and healthcare professionals’ needs including a focus on health promotion, health literacy and patients with chronic diseases. Currently, Austria has 40 operation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595464/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.258 |
_version_ | 1785124873896460288 |
---|---|
author | Radl-Karimi, C Petschk, K Siebenhofer, A Spary-Kainz, U Posch, N Paier-Abuzahra, M |
author_facet | Radl-Karimi, C Petschk, K Siebenhofer, A Spary-Kainz, U Posch, N Paier-Abuzahra, M |
author_sort | Radl-Karimi, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | ISSUE/PROBLEM: In 2017, Austria started the establishment of multi-professional primary health care units (PCUs) to better meet patients’ and healthcare professionals’ needs including a focus on health promotion, health literacy and patients with chronic diseases. Currently, Austria has 40 operational PCUs. In the province of Styria, the quality of care in PCUs is monitored through quality indicators (QI) in annual surveys. The patient questionnaire includes items on patient satisfaction, shared decision-making, and self-management. The PCU team questionnaire covers organizational routines and working satisfaction. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM: Only few improvement initiatives were launched in response to the QI surveys, especially for low-performing QI. In addition, the concept of quality indicators seemed difficult for the teams to understand. As a result, from 2021 on, the surveys are being conducted every other year. In the intervening years, PCU teams get the opportunity to discuss and reflect on the previous yeaŕs results in facilitated workshops. RESULTS: We held workshops in the ten PCUs in Styria from October 2022 to February 2023. In the workshops, the teams identified six strengths (e.g. providing a wide range of services) and six weaknesses (e.g. appointment coordination) of the PCUs with corresponding actions for improvement (e.g. managing the patient flow). LESSONS: Combining the QI surveys with workshops lead to practical actions for quality improvement as well as a better understanding of the relevance of quality indicators among PCU teams and funders. Workshops provided the teams with a dedicated space for reflecting on organizational processes, which they may not have the opportunity to do amidst their heavy workload and still adjusting to PCU structures. KEY MESSAGES: • Engaging the PCU teams in the quality improvement process ensures that the resulting actions are more relevant to their needs and priorities. • Our quality indicators as well as the identified actions for quality improvement are highly transferable to other primary care settings and countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10595464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105954642023-10-25 Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria Radl-Karimi, C Petschk, K Siebenhofer, A Spary-Kainz, U Posch, N Paier-Abuzahra, M Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme ISSUE/PROBLEM: In 2017, Austria started the establishment of multi-professional primary health care units (PCUs) to better meet patients’ and healthcare professionals’ needs including a focus on health promotion, health literacy and patients with chronic diseases. Currently, Austria has 40 operational PCUs. In the province of Styria, the quality of care in PCUs is monitored through quality indicators (QI) in annual surveys. The patient questionnaire includes items on patient satisfaction, shared decision-making, and self-management. The PCU team questionnaire covers organizational routines and working satisfaction. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM: Only few improvement initiatives were launched in response to the QI surveys, especially for low-performing QI. In addition, the concept of quality indicators seemed difficult for the teams to understand. As a result, from 2021 on, the surveys are being conducted every other year. In the intervening years, PCU teams get the opportunity to discuss and reflect on the previous yeaŕs results in facilitated workshops. RESULTS: We held workshops in the ten PCUs in Styria from October 2022 to February 2023. In the workshops, the teams identified six strengths (e.g. providing a wide range of services) and six weaknesses (e.g. appointment coordination) of the PCUs with corresponding actions for improvement (e.g. managing the patient flow). LESSONS: Combining the QI surveys with workshops lead to practical actions for quality improvement as well as a better understanding of the relevance of quality indicators among PCU teams and funders. Workshops provided the teams with a dedicated space for reflecting on organizational processes, which they may not have the opportunity to do amidst their heavy workload and still adjusting to PCU structures. KEY MESSAGES: • Engaging the PCU teams in the quality improvement process ensures that the resulting actions are more relevant to their needs and priorities. • Our quality indicators as well as the identified actions for quality improvement are highly transferable to other primary care settings and countries. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595464/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.258 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Parallel Programme Radl-Karimi, C Petschk, K Siebenhofer, A Spary-Kainz, U Posch, N Paier-Abuzahra, M Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria |
title | Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria |
title_full | Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria |
title_fullStr | Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria |
title_short | Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria |
title_sort | quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: lessons learned from austria |
topic | Parallel Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595464/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radlkarimic qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria AT petschkk qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria AT siebenhofera qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria AT sparykainzu qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria AT poschn qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria AT paierabuzahram qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria |