Cargando…

Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria

ISSUE/PROBLEM: In 2017, Austria started the establishment of multi-professional primary health care units (PCUs) to better meet patients’ and healthcare professionals’ needs including a focus on health promotion, health literacy and patients with chronic diseases. Currently, Austria has 40 operation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radl-Karimi, C, Petschk, K, Siebenhofer, A, Spary-Kainz, U, Posch, N, Paier-Abuzahra, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595464/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.258
_version_ 1785124873896460288
author Radl-Karimi, C
Petschk, K
Siebenhofer, A
Spary-Kainz, U
Posch, N
Paier-Abuzahra, M
author_facet Radl-Karimi, C
Petschk, K
Siebenhofer, A
Spary-Kainz, U
Posch, N
Paier-Abuzahra, M
author_sort Radl-Karimi, C
collection PubMed
description ISSUE/PROBLEM: In 2017, Austria started the establishment of multi-professional primary health care units (PCUs) to better meet patients’ and healthcare professionals’ needs including a focus on health promotion, health literacy and patients with chronic diseases. Currently, Austria has 40 operational PCUs. In the province of Styria, the quality of care in PCUs is monitored through quality indicators (QI) in annual surveys. The patient questionnaire includes items on patient satisfaction, shared decision-making, and self-management. The PCU team questionnaire covers organizational routines and working satisfaction. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM: Only few improvement initiatives were launched in response to the QI surveys, especially for low-performing QI. In addition, the concept of quality indicators seemed difficult for the teams to understand. As a result, from 2021 on, the surveys are being conducted every other year. In the intervening years, PCU teams get the opportunity to discuss and reflect on the previous yeaŕs results in facilitated workshops. RESULTS: We held workshops in the ten PCUs in Styria from October 2022 to February 2023. In the workshops, the teams identified six strengths (e.g. providing a wide range of services) and six weaknesses (e.g. appointment coordination) of the PCUs with corresponding actions for improvement (e.g. managing the patient flow). LESSONS: Combining the QI surveys with workshops lead to practical actions for quality improvement as well as a better understanding of the relevance of quality indicators among PCU teams and funders. Workshops provided the teams with a dedicated space for reflecting on organizational processes, which they may not have the opportunity to do amidst their heavy workload and still adjusting to PCU structures. KEY MESSAGES: • Engaging the PCU teams in the quality improvement process ensures that the resulting actions are more relevant to their needs and priorities. • Our quality indicators as well as the identified actions for quality improvement are highly transferable to other primary care settings and countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105954642023-10-25 Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria Radl-Karimi, C Petschk, K Siebenhofer, A Spary-Kainz, U Posch, N Paier-Abuzahra, M Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme ISSUE/PROBLEM: In 2017, Austria started the establishment of multi-professional primary health care units (PCUs) to better meet patients’ and healthcare professionals’ needs including a focus on health promotion, health literacy and patients with chronic diseases. Currently, Austria has 40 operational PCUs. In the province of Styria, the quality of care in PCUs is monitored through quality indicators (QI) in annual surveys. The patient questionnaire includes items on patient satisfaction, shared decision-making, and self-management. The PCU team questionnaire covers organizational routines and working satisfaction. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM: Only few improvement initiatives were launched in response to the QI surveys, especially for low-performing QI. In addition, the concept of quality indicators seemed difficult for the teams to understand. As a result, from 2021 on, the surveys are being conducted every other year. In the intervening years, PCU teams get the opportunity to discuss and reflect on the previous yeaŕs results in facilitated workshops. RESULTS: We held workshops in the ten PCUs in Styria from October 2022 to February 2023. In the workshops, the teams identified six strengths (e.g. providing a wide range of services) and six weaknesses (e.g. appointment coordination) of the PCUs with corresponding actions for improvement (e.g. managing the patient flow). LESSONS: Combining the QI surveys with workshops lead to practical actions for quality improvement as well as a better understanding of the relevance of quality indicators among PCU teams and funders. Workshops provided the teams with a dedicated space for reflecting on organizational processes, which they may not have the opportunity to do amidst their heavy workload and still adjusting to PCU structures. KEY MESSAGES: • Engaging the PCU teams in the quality improvement process ensures that the resulting actions are more relevant to their needs and priorities. • Our quality indicators as well as the identified actions for quality improvement are highly transferable to other primary care settings and countries. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595464/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.258 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Radl-Karimi, C
Petschk, K
Siebenhofer, A
Spary-Kainz, U
Posch, N
Paier-Abuzahra, M
Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria
title Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria
title_full Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria
title_fullStr Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria
title_full_unstemmed Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria
title_short Quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: Lessons learned from Austria
title_sort quality improvement in multi-professional primary health care units: lessons learned from austria
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595464/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.258
work_keys_str_mv AT radlkarimic qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria
AT petschkk qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria
AT siebenhofera qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria
AT sparykainzu qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria
AT poschn qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria
AT paierabuzahram qualityimprovementinmultiprofessionalprimaryhealthcareunitslessonslearnedfromaustria