Cargando…

Transferable lessons learned from improving health literacy responsiveness in Dutch rheumatology care

BACKGROUND: Health literacy difficulties among (groups of) individuals represent a significant public health challenge. Improving health literacy responsiveness of systems and services could reduce health inequalities in communities and patient populations. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bakker, M M, Putrik, P, Boonen, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595656/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.255
_version_ 1785124920005492736
author Bakker, M M
Putrik, P
Boonen, A
author_facet Bakker, M M
Putrik, P
Boonen, A
author_sort Bakker, M M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health literacy difficulties among (groups of) individuals represent a significant public health challenge. Improving health literacy responsiveness of systems and services could reduce health inequalities in communities and patient populations. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study to improve health literacy responsiveness in three Dutch rheumatology centres, using the OPtimising HEalth LIteracy and Access (Ophelia) approach. Patients and health professionals were involved in an inclusive needs assessment (n = 895 and 39, respectively) and co-design consultations to identify local solutions (n = 14 and 38, respectively). Based on all steps, we formulated transferable lessons learned (outcome-related or process-related) for public health and health care. RESULTS: Outcome-related lessons: a mixed-methods Ophelia approach was successful in identifying health literacy challenges and 175 potential solutions. Challenges are similar between disease groups and centres, but require solutions specific to the local context. Recognising challenges at the point of care is difficult. For a healthcare service to be responsive to health literacy needs, increased awareness alone is not enough; it will require a conscious actions and systemic change at multiple levels, including training. Process-related lessons: prerequisites for a successful health literacy responsiveness project include using multidimensional measurements, an inclusive participatory approach with all stakeholders, collaboration with experts in a community of practice, and strong project governance. CONCLUSIONS: The Ophelia project in rheumatology care was successful in its aims of finding solutions to improve health literacy responsiveness. Public health and healthcare organisations should consider improving their health literacy responsiveness using a grassroots co-design approach. However, project success will depend on the quality of its governance; future programmes should follow a systematic approach. KEY MESSAGES: • Using a grassroots co-design approach such as Ophelia can help identify locally relevant solutions to health literacy challenges and support organisational efforts to reduce health inequalities. • Successfully improving health literacy responsiveness requires, at minimum, inclusion of people with most complex health literacy challenges, strong project governance, and stakeholder engagement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105956562023-10-25 Transferable lessons learned from improving health literacy responsiveness in Dutch rheumatology care Bakker, M M Putrik, P Boonen, A Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Health literacy difficulties among (groups of) individuals represent a significant public health challenge. Improving health literacy responsiveness of systems and services could reduce health inequalities in communities and patient populations. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study to improve health literacy responsiveness in three Dutch rheumatology centres, using the OPtimising HEalth LIteracy and Access (Ophelia) approach. Patients and health professionals were involved in an inclusive needs assessment (n = 895 and 39, respectively) and co-design consultations to identify local solutions (n = 14 and 38, respectively). Based on all steps, we formulated transferable lessons learned (outcome-related or process-related) for public health and health care. RESULTS: Outcome-related lessons: a mixed-methods Ophelia approach was successful in identifying health literacy challenges and 175 potential solutions. Challenges are similar between disease groups and centres, but require solutions specific to the local context. Recognising challenges at the point of care is difficult. For a healthcare service to be responsive to health literacy needs, increased awareness alone is not enough; it will require a conscious actions and systemic change at multiple levels, including training. Process-related lessons: prerequisites for a successful health literacy responsiveness project include using multidimensional measurements, an inclusive participatory approach with all stakeholders, collaboration with experts in a community of practice, and strong project governance. CONCLUSIONS: The Ophelia project in rheumatology care was successful in its aims of finding solutions to improve health literacy responsiveness. Public health and healthcare organisations should consider improving their health literacy responsiveness using a grassroots co-design approach. However, project success will depend on the quality of its governance; future programmes should follow a systematic approach. KEY MESSAGES: • Using a grassroots co-design approach such as Ophelia can help identify locally relevant solutions to health literacy challenges and support organisational efforts to reduce health inequalities. • Successfully improving health literacy responsiveness requires, at minimum, inclusion of people with most complex health literacy challenges, strong project governance, and stakeholder engagement. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595656/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.255 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Bakker, M M
Putrik, P
Boonen, A
Transferable lessons learned from improving health literacy responsiveness in Dutch rheumatology care
title Transferable lessons learned from improving health literacy responsiveness in Dutch rheumatology care
title_full Transferable lessons learned from improving health literacy responsiveness in Dutch rheumatology care
title_fullStr Transferable lessons learned from improving health literacy responsiveness in Dutch rheumatology care
title_full_unstemmed Transferable lessons learned from improving health literacy responsiveness in Dutch rheumatology care
title_short Transferable lessons learned from improving health literacy responsiveness in Dutch rheumatology care
title_sort transferable lessons learned from improving health literacy responsiveness in dutch rheumatology care
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595656/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.255
work_keys_str_mv AT bakkermm transferablelessonslearnedfromimprovinghealthliteracyresponsivenessindutchrheumatologycare
AT putrikp transferablelessonslearnedfromimprovinghealthliteracyresponsivenessindutchrheumatologycare
AT boonena transferablelessonslearnedfromimprovinghealthliteracyresponsivenessindutchrheumatologycare