Cargando…

Night shift work and sickness absence – many for the few or few for the many?

BACKGROUND: Night shift work is related to adverse health outcomes. Yet, some choose working permanent night and it is speculated that they tolerate night work better. However, research on permanent night work is sparse. The aim was to study the association between organisation of night work and sic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larsen, A D, Nielsen, H B, Nabe-Nielsen, K, Kolstad, H A, Hansen, ÅM, Hansen, J, Garde, A H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595665/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1341
_version_ 1785124922168705024
author Larsen, A D
Nielsen, H B
Nabe-Nielsen, K
Kolstad, H A
Hansen, ÅM
Hansen, J
Garde, A H
author_facet Larsen, A D
Nielsen, H B
Nabe-Nielsen, K
Kolstad, H A
Hansen, ÅM
Hansen, J
Garde, A H
author_sort Larsen, A D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Night shift work is related to adverse health outcomes. Yet, some choose working permanent night and it is speculated that they tolerate night work better. However, research on permanent night work is sparse. The aim was to study the association between organisation of night work and sickness absence. Should we allow many night shifts for the few or should we enforce few night shifts for the many? METHODS: Information on working hours, age (19-70 years), gender (women, men) and sickness absence (annual number of days) was obtained from 94 815 nurses and nurse assistants (88% women) from the Danish Working Hour Database (DAD). DAD contains daily information on working hours based on payroll data for all employees in Danish public hospitals (2017-2020). For each year with >50% work participation, individual schedules were classified into “no night shifts”, “1-50 night shifts”, “51-100 night shifts”, “101-150 night shifts” and “more than 150 night shifts”. We applied linear regression (with individual as random intercept) for risk of sickness absence the following year adjusted for age, gender and calendar year. RESULTS: Preliminary results showed night shift workers with more than 150 night shifts per year had 5.0 more sick days (95% CI: 3.5-6.4, p = <0.001) than employees with no night shifts. No statistically significant differences were observed between the four night shift groups. CONCLUSIONS: Employees had more sickness absence the year after working during the night compared to employees without night shift work. However, no differences were seen when yearly comparing employees with many night shifts to those with few night shifts. The study adds to scientific support to guidelines on scheduling of shift work in governmental policies with the aim of securing healthy and safe workplaces. KEY MESSAGES: • Night shift workers have higher number of sick days compared to daytime workers; however, number of night shifts during a year did not affect the results. • The study adds value for the use of the scientific recommendations for minimizing health risk for night shift workers in governmental policies with the aim of securing healthy and safe workplaces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105956652023-10-25 Night shift work and sickness absence – many for the few or few for the many? Larsen, A D Nielsen, H B Nabe-Nielsen, K Kolstad, H A Hansen, ÅM Hansen, J Garde, A H Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Night shift work is related to adverse health outcomes. Yet, some choose working permanent night and it is speculated that they tolerate night work better. However, research on permanent night work is sparse. The aim was to study the association between organisation of night work and sickness absence. Should we allow many night shifts for the few or should we enforce few night shifts for the many? METHODS: Information on working hours, age (19-70 years), gender (women, men) and sickness absence (annual number of days) was obtained from 94 815 nurses and nurse assistants (88% women) from the Danish Working Hour Database (DAD). DAD contains daily information on working hours based on payroll data for all employees in Danish public hospitals (2017-2020). For each year with >50% work participation, individual schedules were classified into “no night shifts”, “1-50 night shifts”, “51-100 night shifts”, “101-150 night shifts” and “more than 150 night shifts”. We applied linear regression (with individual as random intercept) for risk of sickness absence the following year adjusted for age, gender and calendar year. RESULTS: Preliminary results showed night shift workers with more than 150 night shifts per year had 5.0 more sick days (95% CI: 3.5-6.4, p = <0.001) than employees with no night shifts. No statistically significant differences were observed between the four night shift groups. CONCLUSIONS: Employees had more sickness absence the year after working during the night compared to employees without night shift work. However, no differences were seen when yearly comparing employees with many night shifts to those with few night shifts. The study adds to scientific support to guidelines on scheduling of shift work in governmental policies with the aim of securing healthy and safe workplaces. KEY MESSAGES: • Night shift workers have higher number of sick days compared to daytime workers; however, number of night shifts during a year did not affect the results. • The study adds value for the use of the scientific recommendations for minimizing health risk for night shift workers in governmental policies with the aim of securing healthy and safe workplaces. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595665/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1341 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Larsen, A D
Nielsen, H B
Nabe-Nielsen, K
Kolstad, H A
Hansen, ÅM
Hansen, J
Garde, A H
Night shift work and sickness absence – many for the few or few for the many?
title Night shift work and sickness absence – many for the few or few for the many?
title_full Night shift work and sickness absence – many for the few or few for the many?
title_fullStr Night shift work and sickness absence – many for the few or few for the many?
title_full_unstemmed Night shift work and sickness absence – many for the few or few for the many?
title_short Night shift work and sickness absence – many for the few or few for the many?
title_sort night shift work and sickness absence – many for the few or few for the many?
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595665/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1341
work_keys_str_mv AT larsenad nightshiftworkandsicknessabsencemanyforthefeworfewforthemany
AT nielsenhb nightshiftworkandsicknessabsencemanyforthefeworfewforthemany
AT nabenielsenk nightshiftworkandsicknessabsencemanyforthefeworfewforthemany
AT kolstadha nightshiftworkandsicknessabsencemanyforthefeworfewforthemany
AT hansenam nightshiftworkandsicknessabsencemanyforthefeworfewforthemany
AT hansenj nightshiftworkandsicknessabsencemanyforthefeworfewforthemany
AT gardeah nightshiftworkandsicknessabsencemanyforthefeworfewforthemany