Cargando…

1.O. Workshop: Caesarean section in Europe: Are women and babies receiving evidence-based obstetric care?

Every year in Europe, over 1.5 million women have a caesarean section (CS). The use of this surgical procedure is increasing globally, leading to concerns about a caesarean “epidemic”. While CS is a lifesaving procedure for mothers and babies with complications during pregnancy or labour, national v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595679/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.061
_version_ 1785124925554556928
collection PubMed
description Every year in Europe, over 1.5 million women have a caesarean section (CS). The use of this surgical procedure is increasing globally, leading to concerns about a caesarean “epidemic”. While CS is a lifesaving procedure for mothers and babies with complications during pregnancy or labour, national variations in CS rates suggest the absence of standardised indications: in Europe rates vary from lows of 16% (Nordic countries, the Netherlands) to over 40% (Poland, Romania, Greece, Cyprus). Worldwide, the gap between low and high CS countries is even greater. To assess the magnitude of the variations in CS in terms of numbers of women experiencing the procedure in Europe, the Euro-Peristat network calculated that there would be 500,000 fewer CS if all countries had the rates in the lowest CS country. There is uncertainty about what the “optimal” CS rate should be and how this might differ in relation to the health of the childbearing population. CS risk is associated with characteristics of the childbearing population, such as older maternal age, nulliparity, higher body mass index and maternal chronic conditions. The optimal CS rate may also differ depending on the organisation and capacity of the health system. European countries provide a unique context for exploring these questions they have similar standards of living and access to advanced medicine, but differ greatly in the organisation of their health systems and CS practices. In this session, we will present three studies reporting recent data on CS variations and trends in Europe from the Euro-Peristat network to shed light on these questions. The presentations will be followed by a round table discussion about the next steps for evaluating the reasons as well as the health impact of varying practices in order to ensure that European women receive evidence-based obstetric care. KEY MESSAGES: • The persisting variation in the use of caesarean section between European countries raises questions about whether pregnant women and babies are receiving evidence-based care. • Europe provides a unique context for exploring these variations because despite high standards of living and access to medical care, marked differences persist between countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105956792023-10-25 1.O. Workshop: Caesarean section in Europe: Are women and babies receiving evidence-based obstetric care? Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme Every year in Europe, over 1.5 million women have a caesarean section (CS). The use of this surgical procedure is increasing globally, leading to concerns about a caesarean “epidemic”. While CS is a lifesaving procedure for mothers and babies with complications during pregnancy or labour, national variations in CS rates suggest the absence of standardised indications: in Europe rates vary from lows of 16% (Nordic countries, the Netherlands) to over 40% (Poland, Romania, Greece, Cyprus). Worldwide, the gap between low and high CS countries is even greater. To assess the magnitude of the variations in CS in terms of numbers of women experiencing the procedure in Europe, the Euro-Peristat network calculated that there would be 500,000 fewer CS if all countries had the rates in the lowest CS country. There is uncertainty about what the “optimal” CS rate should be and how this might differ in relation to the health of the childbearing population. CS risk is associated with characteristics of the childbearing population, such as older maternal age, nulliparity, higher body mass index and maternal chronic conditions. The optimal CS rate may also differ depending on the organisation and capacity of the health system. European countries provide a unique context for exploring these questions they have similar standards of living and access to advanced medicine, but differ greatly in the organisation of their health systems and CS practices. In this session, we will present three studies reporting recent data on CS variations and trends in Europe from the Euro-Peristat network to shed light on these questions. The presentations will be followed by a round table discussion about the next steps for evaluating the reasons as well as the health impact of varying practices in order to ensure that European women receive evidence-based obstetric care. KEY MESSAGES: • The persisting variation in the use of caesarean section between European countries raises questions about whether pregnant women and babies are receiving evidence-based care. • Europe provides a unique context for exploring these variations because despite high standards of living and access to medical care, marked differences persist between countries. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595679/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.061 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
1.O. Workshop: Caesarean section in Europe: Are women and babies receiving evidence-based obstetric care?
title 1.O. Workshop: Caesarean section in Europe: Are women and babies receiving evidence-based obstetric care?
title_full 1.O. Workshop: Caesarean section in Europe: Are women and babies receiving evidence-based obstetric care?
title_fullStr 1.O. Workshop: Caesarean section in Europe: Are women and babies receiving evidence-based obstetric care?
title_full_unstemmed 1.O. Workshop: Caesarean section in Europe: Are women and babies receiving evidence-based obstetric care?
title_short 1.O. Workshop: Caesarean section in Europe: Are women and babies receiving evidence-based obstetric care?
title_sort 1.o. workshop: caesarean section in europe: are women and babies receiving evidence-based obstetric care?
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595679/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.061
work_keys_str_mv AT 1oworkshopcaesareansectionineuropearewomenandbabiesreceivingevidencebasedobstetriccare
AT 1oworkshopcaesareansectionineuropearewomenandbabiesreceivingevidencebasedobstetriccare