Cargando…

How to evaluate small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods?

BACKGROUND: In deprived neighborhoods there is not only an accumulation of public health problems, but also an accumulation of small-scale interventions to address these problems. For evidence based public health policy it is important to know which interventions are most effective. However, many sm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vendrig-de Punder, YMR, Koops-van Hoffen, H E, Borlee, F, Droomers, M, Seeleman, M C, Kamphuis, CBM, van Lenthe, F J, Vermeulen, RCH, Jambroes, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595689/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1680
_version_ 1785124927924338688
author Vendrig-de Punder, YMR
Koops-van Hoffen, H E
Borlee, F
Droomers, M
Seeleman, M C
Kamphuis, CBM
van Lenthe, F J
Vermeulen, RCH
Jambroes, M
author_facet Vendrig-de Punder, YMR
Koops-van Hoffen, H E
Borlee, F
Droomers, M
Seeleman, M C
Kamphuis, CBM
van Lenthe, F J
Vermeulen, RCH
Jambroes, M
author_sort Vendrig-de Punder, YMR
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In deprived neighborhoods there is not only an accumulation of public health problems, but also an accumulation of small-scale interventions to address these problems. For evidence based public health policy it is important to know which interventions are most effective. However, many small-scale interventions are not well evaluated because standard research methods are not sufficient to provide information about the vulnerable target group. Therefore in the IGLO Utrecht study we developed an evaluation method for small scale interventions in the living environment of deprived neighborhoods. METHODS: Principles from the quadruple helix approach were combined with core components of a methodology for reaching a hard to reach population. This was applied in three studies in a deprived neighborhood in Utrecht: health evaluation of the renovation of a social housing flat, a study about redevelopment in the neighborhood and a study about health-related reasons to visit nature. The intervention and the geographical area of the expected effect on residents health were discussed with professionals. Details about the personal approach, choice of words in the announcement letter and questionnaire were developed in collaboration with an advisory group of residents. RESULTS: Linking the study to the intervention in the neighorhood was helpful in making contact with residents. The response rate of the questionnaire was 49% (86/174) with reach out by telephone, 34% (140/414) with a combination of telephone and door-to-door and 31% (64/209) with a reach out door-to-door. Participants were representative for the neighborhood regarding migration background and education level. Field notes about the informal contact provided additional information to the questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Close collaboration with professionals and residents contributes to a high response in the health evaluation of small-scale interventions. The personal approach is very time-consuming. KEY MESSAGES: • Close collaboration with professionals and residents contributes to a targeted approach and higher response in the health evaluation of small scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods. • A thorough evaluation of small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods is possible, when enough time, budget and capacity can be made available.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105956892023-10-25 How to evaluate small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods? Vendrig-de Punder, YMR Koops-van Hoffen, H E Borlee, F Droomers, M Seeleman, M C Kamphuis, CBM van Lenthe, F J Vermeulen, RCH Jambroes, M Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: In deprived neighborhoods there is not only an accumulation of public health problems, but also an accumulation of small-scale interventions to address these problems. For evidence based public health policy it is important to know which interventions are most effective. However, many small-scale interventions are not well evaluated because standard research methods are not sufficient to provide information about the vulnerable target group. Therefore in the IGLO Utrecht study we developed an evaluation method for small scale interventions in the living environment of deprived neighborhoods. METHODS: Principles from the quadruple helix approach were combined with core components of a methodology for reaching a hard to reach population. This was applied in three studies in a deprived neighborhood in Utrecht: health evaluation of the renovation of a social housing flat, a study about redevelopment in the neighborhood and a study about health-related reasons to visit nature. The intervention and the geographical area of the expected effect on residents health were discussed with professionals. Details about the personal approach, choice of words in the announcement letter and questionnaire were developed in collaboration with an advisory group of residents. RESULTS: Linking the study to the intervention in the neighorhood was helpful in making contact with residents. The response rate of the questionnaire was 49% (86/174) with reach out by telephone, 34% (140/414) with a combination of telephone and door-to-door and 31% (64/209) with a reach out door-to-door. Participants were representative for the neighborhood regarding migration background and education level. Field notes about the informal contact provided additional information to the questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Close collaboration with professionals and residents contributes to a high response in the health evaluation of small-scale interventions. The personal approach is very time-consuming. KEY MESSAGES: • Close collaboration with professionals and residents contributes to a targeted approach and higher response in the health evaluation of small scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods. • A thorough evaluation of small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods is possible, when enough time, budget and capacity can be made available. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595689/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1680 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Vendrig-de Punder, YMR
Koops-van Hoffen, H E
Borlee, F
Droomers, M
Seeleman, M C
Kamphuis, CBM
van Lenthe, F J
Vermeulen, RCH
Jambroes, M
How to evaluate small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods?
title How to evaluate small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods?
title_full How to evaluate small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods?
title_fullStr How to evaluate small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods?
title_full_unstemmed How to evaluate small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods?
title_short How to evaluate small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods?
title_sort how to evaluate small-scale interventions in deprived neighborhoods?
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595689/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1680
work_keys_str_mv AT vendrigdepunderymr howtoevaluatesmallscaleinterventionsindeprivedneighborhoods
AT koopsvanhoffenhe howtoevaluatesmallscaleinterventionsindeprivedneighborhoods
AT borleef howtoevaluatesmallscaleinterventionsindeprivedneighborhoods
AT droomersm howtoevaluatesmallscaleinterventionsindeprivedneighborhoods
AT seelemanmc howtoevaluatesmallscaleinterventionsindeprivedneighborhoods
AT kamphuiscbm howtoevaluatesmallscaleinterventionsindeprivedneighborhoods
AT vanlenthefj howtoevaluatesmallscaleinterventionsindeprivedneighborhoods
AT vermeulenrch howtoevaluatesmallscaleinterventionsindeprivedneighborhoods
AT jambroesm howtoevaluatesmallscaleinterventionsindeprivedneighborhoods